How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?
Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…
Sell
34
SOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.31
Seasonality move
:
-24.73%
Day range:
$1.25 - $1.44
52-week range:
$1.02 - $9.62
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
1.67x
P/S ratio:
3.71x
P/B ratio:
2.30x
Volume:
22.1K
Avg. volume:
22K
1-year change:
-79.91%
Market cap:
$11.7M
Revenue:
$231.4M
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SOS
SOS Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CIHKY
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.4M | -- | 0.88% | -- | $14.14 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SOS
SOS Ltd.
|
$1.31 | -- | $11.7M | 1.67x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.71x |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
$0.13 | -- | $5.1B | 23.05x | $0.00 | 2.49% | 0.80x |
|
CIHKY
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
|
$31.72 | -- | $160B | 7.75x | $0.72 | 6.66% | 2.39x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
$4.82 | -- | $21.1B | 4.94x | $0.19 | 9.55% | 0.54x |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
$5.83 | -- | $24.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.72x |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$11.71 | $14.14 | $774.7M | 8.95x | $1.16 | 9.88% | 2.30x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SOS
SOS Ltd.
|
-- | 2.948 | -- | 4.80x |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
81.79% | 0.921 | -- | 2.47x |
|
CIHKY
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
|
59.06% | 0.818 | 144.1% | 0.00x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
61.65% | 0.014 | -- | 32.62x |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -5.773 | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
0.6% | 2.126 | 1.1% | 3.74x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SOS
SOS Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.93% | -0.93% | -- | -- |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.28% | 1.39% | -- | -- |
|
CIHKY
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
|
-- | $6B | 5.5% | 13.71% | 67.12% | $1.7B |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.96% | 4.87% | 129.19% | -$16.2B |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.9M | $21.4M | 6.58% | 6.63% | 23.96% | $80M |
SOS Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SOS or CCGDF?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to SOS Ltd.'s net margin of --. SOS Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.93% beat China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SOSSOS Ltd.-- -- $430.5M CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B -
What do Analysts Say About SOS or CCGDF?
SOS Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 816.03%. On the other hand China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SOS Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd., analysts believe SOS Ltd. is more attractive than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SOSSOS Ltd.0 0 0 CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SOS or CCGDF More Risky?
SOS Ltd. has a beta of 2.667, which suggesting that the stock is 166.654% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.112, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.157%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SOS or CCGDF?
SOS Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SOS Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays out 56.56% of its earnings as a dividend. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SOS or CCGDF?
SOS Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. SOS Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, SOS Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.67x while China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 23.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SOS Ltd. is 3.71x versus 0.80x for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SOSSOS Ltd.3.71x 1.67x -- -- CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.80x 23.05x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SOS or CIHKY?
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to SOS Ltd.'s net margin of 34.3%. SOS Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.93% beat China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SOSSOS Ltd.-- -- $430.5M CIHKYChina Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.-- $1.08 $384.5B -
What do Analysts Say About SOS or CIHKY?
SOS Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 816.03%. On the other hand China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SOS Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd., analysts believe SOS Ltd. is more attractive than China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SOSSOS Ltd.0 0 0 CIHKYChina Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SOS or CIHKY More Risky?
SOS Ltd. has a beta of 2.667, which suggesting that the stock is 166.654% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.292, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.81%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SOS or CIHKY?
SOS Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 6.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. SOS Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. pays out 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SOS or CIHKY?
SOS Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $15.9B. SOS Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.'s net income of $5.5B. Notably, SOS Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.67x while China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SOS Ltd. is 3.71x versus 2.39x for China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SOSSOS Ltd.3.71x 1.67x -- -- CIHKYChina Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.2.39x 7.75x $15.9B $5.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns SOS or CMAKY?
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to SOS Ltd.'s net margin of 34.61%. SOS Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.93% beat China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SOSSOS Ltd.-- -- $430.5M CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.-- $0.40 $236B -
What do Analysts Say About SOS or CMAKY?
SOS Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 816.03%. On the other hand China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SOS Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd., analysts believe SOS Ltd. is more attractive than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SOSSOS Ltd.0 0 0 CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SOS or CMAKY More Risky?
SOS Ltd. has a beta of 2.667, which suggesting that the stock is 166.654% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a beta of 0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.88%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SOS or CMAKY?
SOS Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. offers a yield of 9.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. SOS Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. pays out 21.2% of its earnings as a dividend. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SOS or CMAKY?
SOS Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5.1B. SOS Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, SOS Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.67x while China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SOS Ltd. is 3.71x versus 0.54x for China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SOSSOS Ltd.3.71x 1.67x -- -- CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0.54x 4.94x $5.1B $1.8B
-
Which has Higher Returns SOS or MAAS?
Maase, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to SOS Ltd.'s net margin of --. SOS Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.93% beat Maase, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SOSSOS Ltd.-- -- $430.5M MAASMaase, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SOS or MAAS?
SOS Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 816.03%. On the other hand Maase, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SOS Ltd. has higher upside potential than Maase, Inc., analysts believe SOS Ltd. is more attractive than Maase, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SOSSOS Ltd.0 0 0 MAASMaase, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SOS or MAAS More Risky?
SOS Ltd. has a beta of 2.667, which suggesting that the stock is 166.654% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maase, Inc. has a beta of -0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 196.664%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SOS or MAAS?
SOS Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maase, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SOS Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maase, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SOS or MAAS?
SOS Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Maase, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. SOS Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Maase, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, SOS Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.67x while Maase, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SOS Ltd. is 3.71x versus 2.72x for Maase, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SOSSOS Ltd.3.71x 1.67x -- -- MAASMaase, Inc.2.72x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SOS or NOAH?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to SOS Ltd.'s net margin of 34.3%. SOS Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.93% beat Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SOSSOS Ltd.-- -- $430.5M NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B -
What do Analysts Say About SOS or NOAH?
SOS Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 816.03%. On the other hand Noah Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $14.14 which suggests that it could grow by 20.79%. Given that SOS Ltd. has higher upside potential than Noah Holdings Ltd., analysts believe SOS Ltd. is more attractive than Noah Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SOSSOS Ltd.0 0 0 NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 0 -
Is SOS or NOAH More Risky?
SOS Ltd. has a beta of 2.667, which suggesting that the stock is 166.654% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.728, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.234%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SOS or NOAH?
SOS Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Noah Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 9.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. SOS Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays out 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SOS or NOAH?
SOS Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $89.1M. SOS Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M. Notably, SOS Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.67x while Noah Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SOS Ltd. is 3.71x versus 2.30x for Noah Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SOSSOS Ltd.3.71x 1.67x -- -- NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2.30x 8.95x $89.1M $30.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Sell
40
BILL alert for Feb 7
Bill Holdings, Inc. [BILL] is up 37.11% over the past day.
Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 7
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is up 28.33% over the past day.
Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 7
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 26.08% over the past day.
