SNDA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CVS Health Corp. has a net margin of -30.87% compared to Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s net margin of 2.77%. Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s return on equity of -72.2% beat CVS Health Corp.'s return on equity of 2.28%.

Sonida Senior Living, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.66%. On the other hand CVS Health Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $96.42 which suggests that it could grow by 31.21%. Given that CVS Health Corp. has higher upside potential than Sonida Senior Living, Inc., analysts believe CVS Health Corp. is more attractive than Sonida Senior Living, Inc..

Sonida Senior Living, Inc. has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.381% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVS Health Corp. has a beta of 0.511, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.916%.

Sonida Senior Living, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVS Health Corp. offers a yield of 3.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Sonida Senior Living, Inc. pays 85.92% of its earnings as a dividend. CVS Health Corp. pays out 191.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CVS Health Corp.'s is not.

Sonida Senior Living, Inc. quarterly revenues are $97.7M, which are smaller than CVS Health Corp. quarterly revenues of $105.7B. Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s net income of -$30.1M is lower than CVS Health Corp.'s net income of $2.9B. Notably, Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CVS Health Corp.'s PE ratio is 53.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sonida Senior Living, Inc. is 1.53x versus 0.24x for CVS Health Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

InnovAge Holding Corp. has a net margin of -30.87% compared to Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s net margin of 4.93%. Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s return on equity of -72.2% beat InnovAge Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 1.21%.

Sonida Senior Living, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.66%. On the other hand InnovAge Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could fall by -8.02%. Given that Sonida Senior Living, Inc. has higher upside potential than InnovAge Holding Corp., analysts believe Sonida Senior Living, Inc. is more attractive than InnovAge Holding Corp..

Sonida Senior Living, Inc. has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.381% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison InnovAge Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.503, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.705%.

Sonida Senior Living, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. InnovAge Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sonida Senior Living, Inc. pays 85.92% of its earnings as a dividend. InnovAge Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sonida Senior Living, Inc. quarterly revenues are $97.7M, which are smaller than InnovAge Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $239.7M. Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s net income of -$30.1M is lower than InnovAge Holding Corp.'s net income of $11.8M. Notably, Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while InnovAge Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 155.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sonida Senior Living, Inc. is 1.53x versus 1.07x for InnovAge Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Labcorp Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -30.87% compared to Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s net margin of 4.69%. Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s return on equity of -72.2% beat Labcorp Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.39%.

Sonida Senior Living, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.66%. On the other hand Labcorp Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $308.29 which suggests that it could grow by 12.63%. Given that Labcorp Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sonida Senior Living, Inc., analysts believe Labcorp Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Sonida Senior Living, Inc..

Sonida Senior Living, Inc. has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.381% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Labcorp Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.691%.

Sonida Senior Living, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Labcorp Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Sonida Senior Living, Inc. pays 85.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Labcorp Holdings, Inc. pays out 27.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sonida Senior Living, Inc. quarterly revenues are $97.7M, which are smaller than Labcorp Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s net income of -$30.1M is lower than Labcorp Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $164.9M. Notably, Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Labcorp Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sonida Senior Living, Inc. is 1.53x versus 1.65x for Labcorp Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

National HealthCare Corp. has a net margin of -30.87% compared to Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s net margin of 6.55%. Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s return on equity of -72.2% beat National HealthCare Corp.'s return on equity of 11.91%.

Sonida Senior Living, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.66%. On the other hand National HealthCare Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sonida Senior Living, Inc. has higher upside potential than National HealthCare Corp., analysts believe Sonida Senior Living, Inc. is more attractive than National HealthCare Corp..

Sonida Senior Living, Inc. has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.381% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National HealthCare Corp. has a beta of 0.581, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.939%.

Sonida Senior Living, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National HealthCare Corp. offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share. Sonida Senior Living, Inc. pays 85.92% of its earnings as a dividend. National HealthCare Corp. pays out 32.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sonida Senior Living, Inc. quarterly revenues are $97.7M, which are smaller than National HealthCare Corp. quarterly revenues of $384.8M. Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s net income of -$30.1M is lower than National HealthCare Corp.'s net income of $25.2M. Notably, Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while National HealthCare Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sonida Senior Living, Inc. is 1.53x versus 1.74x for National HealthCare Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.