NHC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Shared Hospital Services has a net margin of 12.58% compared to National Healthcare's net margin of -2.96%. National Healthcare's return on equity of 13.34% beat American Shared Hospital Services's return on equity of 13.75%.

National Healthcare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Shared Hospital Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 35.54%. Given that American Shared Hospital Services has higher upside potential than National Healthcare, analysts believe American Shared Hospital Services is more attractive than National Healthcare.

National Healthcare has a beta of 0.427, which suggesting that the stock is 57.321% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Shared Hospital Services has a beta of 0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.72%.

National Healthcare has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. American Shared Hospital Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Healthcare pays 53.24% of its earnings as a dividend. American Shared Hospital Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Healthcare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Healthcare quarterly revenues are $340.2M, which are larger than American Shared Hospital Services quarterly revenues of $7M. National Healthcare's net income of $42.8M is higher than American Shared Hospital Services's net income of -$207K. Notably, National Healthcare's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.02x while American Shared Hospital Services's PE ratio is 5.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Healthcare is 1.42x versus 0.87x for American Shared Hospital Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

InnovAge Holding has a net margin of 12.58% compared to National Healthcare's net margin of -2.4%. National Healthcare's return on equity of 13.34% beat InnovAge Holding's return on equity of -5.29%.

National Healthcare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand InnovAge Holding has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 31.27%. Given that InnovAge Holding has higher upside potential than National Healthcare, analysts believe InnovAge Holding is more attractive than National Healthcare.

National Healthcare has a beta of 0.427, which suggesting that the stock is 57.321% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison InnovAge Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

National Healthcare has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. InnovAge Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Healthcare pays 53.24% of its earnings as a dividend. InnovAge Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Healthcare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Healthcare quarterly revenues are $340.2M, which are larger than InnovAge Holding quarterly revenues of $205.1M. National Healthcare's net income of $42.8M is higher than InnovAge Holding's net income of -$4.9M. Notably, National Healthcare's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.02x while InnovAge Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Healthcare is 1.42x versus 0.72x for InnovAge Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regional Health Properties has a net margin of 12.58% compared to National Healthcare's net margin of -23.24%. National Healthcare's return on equity of 13.34% beat Regional Health Properties's return on equity of -489.72%.

National Healthcare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Regional Health Properties has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 330.46%. Given that Regional Health Properties has higher upside potential than National Healthcare, analysts believe Regional Health Properties is more attractive than National Healthcare.

National Healthcare has a beta of 0.427, which suggesting that the stock is 57.321% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regional Health Properties has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.446%.

National Healthcare has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Regional Health Properties offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Healthcare pays 53.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Regional Health Properties pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Healthcare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Healthcare quarterly revenues are $340.2M, which are larger than Regional Health Properties quarterly revenues of $4.2M. National Healthcare's net income of $42.8M is higher than Regional Health Properties's net income of -$982K. Notably, National Healthcare's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.02x while Regional Health Properties's PE ratio is 0.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Healthcare is 1.42x versus 0.16x for Regional Health Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sonida Senior Living has a net margin of 12.58% compared to National Healthcare's net margin of -18.41%. National Healthcare's return on equity of 13.34% beat Sonida Senior Living's return on equity of -145.3%.

National Healthcare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sonida Senior Living has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.49%. Given that Sonida Senior Living has higher upside potential than National Healthcare, analysts believe Sonida Senior Living is more attractive than National Healthcare.

National Healthcare has a beta of 0.427, which suggesting that the stock is 57.321% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sonida Senior Living has a beta of 1.798, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.772%.

National Healthcare has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Sonida Senior Living offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Healthcare pays 53.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Sonida Senior Living pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Healthcare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Healthcare quarterly revenues are $340.2M, which are larger than Sonida Senior Living quarterly revenues of $74.8M. National Healthcare's net income of $42.8M is higher than Sonida Senior Living's net income of -$13.8M. Notably, National Healthcare's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.02x while Sonida Senior Living's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Healthcare is 1.42x versus 0.99x for Sonida Senior Living. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.