SBH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. has a net margin of 5.27% compared to Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 9.95%. Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.65% beat Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.'s return on equity of 42.46%.

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.25, signalling upside risk potential of 4.57%. On the other hand Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $75.00 which suggests that it could grow by 65.02%. Given that Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. is more attractive than Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc..

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.076% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.14%.

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. pays out 21.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $947.1M, which are larger than Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. quarterly revenues of $122.7M. Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is higher than Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.'s net income of $8.1M. Notably, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.22x while Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. is 0.44x versus 1.23x for Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genesco, Inc. has a net margin of 5.27% compared to Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -3.38%. Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.65% beat Genesco, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.76%.

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.25, signalling upside risk potential of 4.57%. On the other hand Genesco, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $30.33 which suggests that it could grow by 39.46%. Given that Genesco, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Genesco, Inc. is more attractive than Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc..

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.076% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genesco, Inc. has a beta of 1.751, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.075%.

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genesco, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genesco, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $947.1M, which are larger than Genesco, Inc. quarterly revenues of $616.2M. Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is higher than Genesco, Inc.'s net income of $5.4M. Notably, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.22x while Genesco, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. is 0.44x versus 0.11x for Genesco, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The TJX Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 5.27% compared to Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 9.54%. Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.65% beat The TJX Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 59.12%.

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.25, signalling upside risk potential of 4.57%. On the other hand The TJX Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $159.50 which suggests that it could grow by 6.21%. Given that The TJX Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., analysts believe The TJX Cos., Inc. is more attractive than Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc..

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.076% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The TJX Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.764, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.585%.

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The TJX Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The TJX Cos., Inc. pays out 35.22% of its earnings as a dividend. The TJX Cos., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $947.1M, which are smaller than The TJX Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $15.1B. Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is lower than The TJX Cos., Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.22x while The TJX Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. is 0.44x versus 2.88x for The TJX Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ulta Beauty, Inc. has a net margin of 5.27% compared to Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 9.36%. Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.65% beat Ulta Beauty, Inc.'s return on equity of 49.24%.

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.25, signalling upside risk potential of 4.57%. On the other hand Ulta Beauty, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $580.87 which suggests that it could grow by 8.22%. Given that Ulta Beauty, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Ulta Beauty, Inc. is more attractive than Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc..

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.076% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ulta Beauty, Inc. has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.267%.

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ulta Beauty, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ulta Beauty, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $947.1M, which are smaller than Ulta Beauty, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is lower than Ulta Beauty, Inc.'s net income of $260.9M. Notably, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.22x while Ulta Beauty, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. is 0.44x versus 2.11x for Ulta Beauty, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.