SBDS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of -43.23% compared to Solo Brands, Inc.'s net margin of --. Solo Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -66.37% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Solo Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 498.8%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solo Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Solo Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Solo Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Solo Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solo Brands, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Solo Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $53M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Solo Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$22.9M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Solo Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solo Brands, Inc. is 0.55x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Envela Corp. has a net margin of -43.23% compared to Solo Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 5.85%. Solo Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -66.37% beat Envela Corp.'s return on equity of 18.37%.

Solo Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 498.8%. On the other hand Envela Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could fall by -10.78%. Given that Solo Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Envela Corp., analysts believe Solo Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Envela Corp..

Solo Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envela Corp. has a beta of 0.228, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.218%.

Solo Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envela Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solo Brands, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envela Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Solo Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $53M, which are smaller than Envela Corp. quarterly revenues of $57.4M. Solo Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$22.9M is lower than Envela Corp.'s net income of $3.4M. Notably, Solo Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Envela Corp.'s PE ratio is 37.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solo Brands, Inc. is 0.55x versus 1.81x for Envela Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has a net margin of -43.23% compared to Solo Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -350.76%. Solo Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -66.37% beat Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s return on equity of -245.24%.

Solo Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 498.8%. On the other hand Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 33553.85%. Given that Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has higher upside potential than Solo Brands, Inc., analysts believe Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. is more attractive than Solo Brands, Inc..

Solo Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has a beta of 0.424, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.64%.

Solo Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solo Brands, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Solo Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $53M, which are larger than Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8M. Solo Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$22.9M is lower than Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s net income of -$6.4M. Notably, Solo Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solo Brands, Inc. is 0.55x versus 0.28x for Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -43.23% compared to Solo Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -1757.18%. Solo Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -66.37% beat Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4%.

Solo Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 498.8%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 168.82%. Given that Solo Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings Corp., analysts believe Solo Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings Corp..

Solo Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.113%.

Solo Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solo Brands, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Solo Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $53M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $759K. Solo Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$22.9M is lower than Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Solo Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solo Brands, Inc. is 0.55x versus 76.09x for Hyliion Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.