RITM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bluerock Homes Trust has a net margin of 12.82% compared to Rithm Capital's net margin of -4.67%. Rithm Capital's return on equity of 9.24% beat Bluerock Homes Trust's return on equity of 0.01%.

Rithm Capital has a consensus price target of $13.75, signalling upside risk potential of 22.44%. On the other hand Bluerock Homes Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rithm Capital has higher upside potential than Bluerock Homes Trust, analysts believe Rithm Capital is more attractive than Bluerock Homes Trust.

Rithm Capital has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.514% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bluerock Homes Trust has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rithm Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.91%. Bluerock Homes Trust offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Rithm Capital pays 63.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Bluerock Homes Trust pays out 22925% of its earnings as a dividend. Rithm Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Bluerock Homes Trust's is not.

Rithm Capital quarterly revenues are $493M, which are larger than Bluerock Homes Trust quarterly revenues of $13.8M. Rithm Capital's net income of $63.2M is higher than Bluerock Homes Trust's net income of -$645K. Notably, Rithm Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.36x while Bluerock Homes Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rithm Capital is 2.07x versus 0.78x for Bluerock Homes Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lineage has a net margin of 12.82% compared to Rithm Capital's net margin of --. Rithm Capital's return on equity of 9.24% beat Lineage's return on equity of -6.96%.

Rithm Capital has a consensus price target of $13.75, signalling upside risk potential of 22.44%. On the other hand Lineage has an analysts' consensus of $64.89 which suggests that it could grow by 42.25%. Given that Lineage has higher upside potential than Rithm Capital, analysts believe Lineage is more attractive than Rithm Capital.

Rithm Capital has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.514% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lineage has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rithm Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.91%. Lineage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Rithm Capital pays 63.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Lineage pays out -35.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Rithm Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rithm Capital quarterly revenues are $493M, which are smaller than Lineage quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Rithm Capital's net income of $63.2M is higher than Lineage's net income of --. Notably, Rithm Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.36x while Lineage's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rithm Capital is 2.07x versus 1.91x for Lineage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a net margin of 12.82% compared to Rithm Capital's net margin of 69.76%. Rithm Capital's return on equity of 9.24% beat Seven Hills Realty Trust's return on equity of 6.27%.

Rithm Capital has a consensus price target of $13.75, signalling upside risk potential of 22.44%. On the other hand Seven Hills Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of $14.50 which suggests that it could grow by 25.11%. Given that Seven Hills Realty Trust has higher upside potential than Rithm Capital, analysts believe Seven Hills Realty Trust is more attractive than Rithm Capital.

Rithm Capital has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.514% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seven Hills Realty Trust has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.684%.

Rithm Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.91%. Seven Hills Realty Trust offers a yield of 12.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Rithm Capital pays 63.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Seven Hills Realty Trust pays out 117.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Rithm Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Seven Hills Realty Trust's is not.

Rithm Capital quarterly revenues are $493M, which are larger than Seven Hills Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $6.5M. Rithm Capital's net income of $63.2M is higher than Seven Hills Realty Trust's net income of $4.5M. Notably, Rithm Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.36x while Seven Hills Realty Trust's PE ratio is 10.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rithm Capital is 2.07x versus 6.05x for Seven Hills Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a net margin of 12.82% compared to Rithm Capital's net margin of 4.81%. Rithm Capital's return on equity of 9.24% beat Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.19%.

Rithm Capital has a consensus price target of $13.75, signalling upside risk potential of 22.44%. On the other hand Strawberry Fields REIT has an analysts' consensus of $13.86 which suggests that it could grow by 38.57%. Given that Strawberry Fields REIT has higher upside potential than Rithm Capital, analysts believe Strawberry Fields REIT is more attractive than Rithm Capital.

Rithm Capital has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.514% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rithm Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.91%. Strawberry Fields REIT offers a yield of 5.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Rithm Capital pays 63.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT pays out 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rithm Capital quarterly revenues are $493M, which are larger than Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues of $30.5M. Rithm Capital's net income of $63.2M is higher than Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Rithm Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.36x while Strawberry Fields REIT's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rithm Capital is 2.07x versus 0.61x for Strawberry Fields REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.