SEVN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bluerock Homes Trust has a net margin of 71.98% compared to Seven Hills Realty Trust's net margin of -4.67%. Seven Hills Realty Trust's return on equity of 6.52% beat Bluerock Homes Trust's return on equity of 0.01%.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling upside risk potential of 32.09%. On the other hand Bluerock Homes Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Seven Hills Realty Trust has higher upside potential than Bluerock Homes Trust, analysts believe Seven Hills Realty Trust is more attractive than Bluerock Homes Trust.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bluerock Homes Trust has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.47%. Bluerock Homes Trust offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Seven Hills Realty Trust pays 117.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Bluerock Homes Trust pays out 22925% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seven Hills Realty Trust quarterly revenues are $6.5M, which are smaller than Bluerock Homes Trust quarterly revenues of $13.8M. Seven Hills Realty Trust's net income of $4.7M is higher than Bluerock Homes Trust's net income of -$645K. Notably, Seven Hills Realty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.44x while Bluerock Homes Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seven Hills Realty Trust is 5.51x versus 0.77x for Bluerock Homes Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lineage has a net margin of 71.98% compared to Seven Hills Realty Trust's net margin of -5.3%. Seven Hills Realty Trust's return on equity of 6.52% beat Lineage's return on equity of -7.47%.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling upside risk potential of 32.09%. On the other hand Lineage has an analysts' consensus of $68.89 which suggests that it could grow by 22.2%. Given that Seven Hills Realty Trust has higher upside potential than Lineage, analysts believe Seven Hills Realty Trust is more attractive than Lineage.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lineage has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.47%. Lineage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Seven Hills Realty Trust pays 117.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Lineage pays out -35.24% of its earnings as a dividend.

Seven Hills Realty Trust quarterly revenues are $6.5M, which are smaller than Lineage quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Seven Hills Realty Trust's net income of $4.7M is higher than Lineage's net income of -$71M. Notably, Seven Hills Realty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.44x while Lineage's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seven Hills Realty Trust is 5.51x versus 2.32x for Lineage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a net margin of 71.98% compared to Seven Hills Realty Trust's net margin of 56.96%. Seven Hills Realty Trust's return on equity of 6.52% beat Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's return on equity of 12.73%.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling upside risk potential of 32.09%. On the other hand Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.58%. Given that Seven Hills Realty Trust has higher upside potential than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, analysts believe Seven Hills Realty Trust is more attractive than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.47%. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance offers a yield of 13.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Seven Hills Realty Trust pays 117.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance pays out 112.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seven Hills Realty Trust quarterly revenues are $6.5M, which are smaller than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance quarterly revenues of $13.9M. Seven Hills Realty Trust's net income of $4.7M is lower than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's net income of $7.9M. Notably, Seven Hills Realty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.44x while Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's PE ratio is 7.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seven Hills Realty Trust is 5.51x versus 5.12x for Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a net margin of 71.98% compared to Seven Hills Realty Trust's net margin of 4.81%. Seven Hills Realty Trust's return on equity of 6.52% beat Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.19%.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling upside risk potential of 32.09%. On the other hand Strawberry Fields REIT has an analysts' consensus of $13.86 which suggests that it could grow by 26.67%. Given that Seven Hills Realty Trust has higher upside potential than Strawberry Fields REIT, analysts believe Seven Hills Realty Trust is more attractive than Strawberry Fields REIT.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.47%. Strawberry Fields REIT offers a yield of 4.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Seven Hills Realty Trust pays 117.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT pays out 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Seven Hills Realty Trust's is not.

Seven Hills Realty Trust quarterly revenues are $6.5M, which are smaller than Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues of $30.5M. Seven Hills Realty Trust's net income of $4.7M is higher than Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Seven Hills Realty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.44x while Strawberry Fields REIT's PE ratio is 19.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seven Hills Realty Trust is 5.51x versus 0.67x for Strawberry Fields REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.