REFI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bluerock Homes Trust has a net margin of 77.54% compared to Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's net margin of 18.36%. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's return on equity of 13.55% beat Bluerock Homes Trust's return on equity of -2.57%.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a consensus price target of $18.67, signalling upside risk potential of 16.85%. On the other hand Bluerock Homes Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has higher upside potential than Bluerock Homes Trust, analysts believe Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance is more attractive than Bluerock Homes Trust.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bluerock Homes Trust has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.77%. Bluerock Homes Trust offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance pays 101.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Bluerock Homes Trust pays out -0.5% of its earnings as a dividend.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance quarterly revenues are $14.5M, which are larger than Bluerock Homes Trust quarterly revenues of $12.7M. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's net income of $11.2M is higher than Bluerock Homes Trust's net income of $2.3M. Notably, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.99x while Bluerock Homes Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance is 5.52x versus 1.12x for Bluerock Homes Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lineage has a net margin of 77.54% compared to Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's net margin of -0.31%. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's return on equity of 13.55% beat Lineage's return on equity of --.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a consensus price target of $18.67, signalling upside risk potential of 16.85%. On the other hand Lineage has an analysts' consensus of $83.25 which suggests that it could grow by 42.14%. Given that Lineage has higher upside potential than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, analysts believe Lineage is more attractive than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lineage has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.77%. Lineage offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance pays 101.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Lineage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance quarterly revenues are $14.5M, which are smaller than Lineage quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's net income of $11.2M is higher than Lineage's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.99x while Lineage's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance is 5.52x versus -- for Lineage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a net margin of 77.54% compared to Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's net margin of 47.74%. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's return on equity of 13.55% beat Seven Hills Realty Trust's return on equity of 6.93%.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a consensus price target of $18.67, signalling upside risk potential of 16.85%. On the other hand Seven Hills Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of $14.83 which suggests that it could grow by 13.06%. Given that Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has higher upside potential than Seven Hills Realty Trust, analysts believe Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance is more attractive than Seven Hills Realty Trust.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seven Hills Realty Trust has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.396%.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.77%. Seven Hills Realty Trust offers a yield of 10.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance pays 101.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Seven Hills Realty Trust pays out 80.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Seven Hills Realty Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's is not.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance quarterly revenues are $14.5M, which are larger than Seven Hills Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $7.3M. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's net income of $11.2M is higher than Seven Hills Realty Trust's net income of $3.5M. Notably, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.99x while Seven Hills Realty Trust's PE ratio is 10.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance is 5.52x versus 6.01x for Seven Hills Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a net margin of 77.54% compared to Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's net margin of 3.2%. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's return on equity of 13.55% beat Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 6.55%.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a consensus price target of $18.67, signalling upside risk potential of 16.85%. On the other hand Strawberry Fields REIT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.46%. Given that Strawberry Fields REIT has higher upside potential than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, analysts believe Strawberry Fields REIT is more attractive than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.77%. Strawberry Fields REIT offers a yield of 4.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance pays 101.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT pays out 115.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance quarterly revenues are $14.5M, which are smaller than Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues of $29.5M. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's net income of $11.2M is higher than Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $944K. Notably, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.99x while Strawberry Fields REIT's PE ratio is 20.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance is 5.52x versus 0.62x for Strawberry Fields REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.