RERE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 0.44% compared to ATRenew's net margin of 3.35%. ATRenew's return on equity of -2.25% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

ATRenew has a consensus price target of $3.15, signalling upside risk potential of 12.05%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 81.6%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than ATRenew, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than ATRenew.

ATRenew has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.319%.

ATRenew has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. ATRenew pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATRenew quarterly revenues are $565.8M, which are larger than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. ATRenew's net income of $2.5M is lower than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, ATRenew's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATRenew is 0.33x versus 0.20x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smart Share Global has a net margin of 0.44% compared to ATRenew's net margin of 1.98%. ATRenew's return on equity of -2.25% beat Smart Share Global's return on equity of 2.24%.

ATRenew has a consensus price target of $3.15, signalling upside risk potential of 12.05%. On the other hand Smart Share Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 159.59%. Given that Smart Share Global has higher upside potential than ATRenew, analysts believe Smart Share Global is more attractive than ATRenew.

ATRenew has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smart Share Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ATRenew has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smart Share Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. ATRenew pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smart Share Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATRenew quarterly revenues are $565.8M, which are larger than Smart Share Global quarterly revenues of $64.4M. ATRenew's net income of $2.5M is higher than Smart Share Global's net income of $1.3M. Notably, ATRenew's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Smart Share Global's PE ratio is 20.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATRenew is 0.33x versus 0.69x for Smart Share Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trip.com Group has a net margin of 0.44% compared to ATRenew's net margin of 42.62%. ATRenew's return on equity of -2.25% beat Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.5%.

ATRenew has a consensus price target of $3.15, signalling upside risk potential of 12.05%. On the other hand Trip.com Group has an analysts' consensus of $76.13 which suggests that it could grow by 5.08%. Given that ATRenew has higher upside potential than Trip.com Group, analysts believe ATRenew is more attractive than Trip.com Group.

ATRenew has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.385, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.53%.

ATRenew has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trip.com Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATRenew pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trip.com Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATRenew quarterly revenues are $565.8M, which are smaller than Trip.com Group quarterly revenues of $2.2B. ATRenew's net income of $2.5M is lower than Trip.com Group's net income of $944.8M. Notably, ATRenew's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trip.com Group's PE ratio is 21.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATRenew is 0.33x versus 6.93x for Trip.com Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viomi Technology has a net margin of 0.44% compared to ATRenew's net margin of --. ATRenew's return on equity of -2.25% beat Viomi Technology's return on equity of -1.74%.

ATRenew has a consensus price target of $3.15, signalling upside risk potential of 12.05%. On the other hand Viomi Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 167.86%. Given that Viomi Technology has higher upside potential than ATRenew, analysts believe Viomi Technology is more attractive than ATRenew.

ATRenew has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viomi Technology has a beta of 0.704, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.604%.

ATRenew has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viomi Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATRenew pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viomi Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATRenew quarterly revenues are $565.8M, which are larger than Viomi Technology quarterly revenues of --. ATRenew's net income of $2.5M is higher than Viomi Technology's net income of --. Notably, ATRenew's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Viomi Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATRenew is 0.33x versus 0.31x for Viomi Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.