RERE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 1.76% compared to ATRenew Inc.'s net margin of 6.1%. ATRenew Inc.'s return on equity of 7.53% beat China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.53%.

ATRenew Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.86, signalling upside risk potential of 28.47%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 79.86%. Given that China Automotive Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than ATRenew Inc., analysts believe China Automotive Systems, Inc. is more attractive than ATRenew Inc..

ATRenew Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.83%.

ATRenew Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. ATRenew Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATRenew Inc. quarterly revenues are $719.4M, which are larger than China Automotive Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $193.2M. ATRenew Inc.'s net income of $12.7M is higher than China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net income of $11.8M. Notably, ATRenew Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.11x while China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATRenew Inc. is 0.48x versus 0.17x for China Automotive Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H World Group Ltd. has a net margin of 1.76% compared to ATRenew Inc.'s net margin of 21.06%. ATRenew Inc.'s return on equity of 7.53% beat H World Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 33.7%.

ATRenew Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.86, signalling upside risk potential of 28.47%. On the other hand H World Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $50.89 which suggests that it could grow by 7.82%. Given that ATRenew Inc. has higher upside potential than H World Group Ltd., analysts believe ATRenew Inc. is more attractive than H World Group Ltd..

ATRenew Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.874%.

ATRenew Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H World Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. ATRenew Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group Ltd. pays out 120.75% of its earnings as a dividend.

ATRenew Inc. quarterly revenues are $719.4M, which are smaller than H World Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $979.3M. ATRenew Inc.'s net income of $12.7M is lower than H World Group Ltd.'s net income of $206.3M. Notably, ATRenew Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.11x while H World Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 27.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATRenew Inc. is 0.48x versus 4.31x for H World Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JD.com, Inc. has a net margin of 1.76% compared to ATRenew Inc.'s net margin of 2.13%. ATRenew Inc.'s return on equity of 7.53% beat JD.com, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.48%.

ATRenew Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.86, signalling upside risk potential of 28.47%. On the other hand JD.com, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $43.37 which suggests that it could grow by 45.82%. Given that JD.com, Inc. has higher upside potential than ATRenew Inc., analysts believe JD.com, Inc. is more attractive than ATRenew Inc..

ATRenew Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JD.com, Inc. has a beta of 0.402, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.758%.

ATRenew Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JD.com, Inc. offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. ATRenew Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com, Inc. pays out 26.59% of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ATRenew Inc. quarterly revenues are $719.4M, which are smaller than JD.com, Inc. quarterly revenues of $42.1B. ATRenew Inc.'s net income of $12.7M is lower than JD.com, Inc.'s net income of $897.2M. Notably, ATRenew Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.11x while JD.com, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATRenew Inc. is 0.48x versus 0.25x for JD.com, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a net margin of 1.76% compared to ATRenew Inc.'s net margin of -0.69%. ATRenew Inc.'s return on equity of 7.53% beat Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -17.28%.

ATRenew Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.86, signalling upside risk potential of 28.47%. On the other hand Lifetime Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 28.81%. Given that Lifetime Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than ATRenew Inc., analysts believe Lifetime Brands, Inc. is more attractive than ATRenew Inc..

ATRenew Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.338, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.834%.

ATRenew Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lifetime Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. ATRenew Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifetime Brands, Inc. pays out 25.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ATRenew Inc. quarterly revenues are $719.4M, which are larger than Lifetime Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $171.9M. ATRenew Inc.'s net income of $12.7M is higher than Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, ATRenew Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.11x while Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATRenew Inc. is 0.48x versus 0.14x for Lifetime Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.