Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
17
CMEIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.16
Seasonality move
:
-17.38%
Day range:
$0.16 - $0.16
52-week range:
$0.16 - $0.32
Dividend yield:
3.91%
P/E ratio:
39.27x
P/S ratio:
0.07x
P/B ratio:
0.87x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
167
1-year change:
-46.9%
Market cap:
$214.5M
Revenue:
$3.1B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.31
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMEIF
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BQ
Boqii Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HTHT
H World Group Ltd.
|
$948.8M | $0.67 | 7.85% | 1226.79% | $51.34 |
|
JXG
JX Luxventure Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KNDI
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMEIF
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.16 | -- | $214.5M | 39.27x | $0.01 | 3.91% | 0.07x |
|
BQ
Boqii Holding Ltd.
|
$2.10 | -- | $7.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 7.55x |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
|
$4.18 | -- | $126.1M | 3.77x | $0.80 | 0% | 0.17x |
|
HTHT
H World Group Ltd.
|
$48.35 | $51.34 | $14.8B | 27.99x | $0.81 | 3.68% | 4.46x |
|
JXG
JX Luxventure Group, Inc.
|
$8.12 | -- | $9.8M | 0.84x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
|
KNDI
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.
|
$0.80 | -- | $65.7M | 58.83x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.54x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMEIF
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.
|
49.34% | -0.215 | -- | 0.58x |
|
BQ
Boqii Holding Ltd.
|
20.86% | 17.428 | 94.88% | 2.05x |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
|
17.66% | 0.704 | 42.96% | 0.94x |
|
HTHT
H World Group Ltd.
|
75.78% | -0.398 | 43.41% | 0.78x |
|
JXG
JX Luxventure Group, Inc.
|
3.38% | -0.478 | 4.92% | 0.59x |
|
KNDI
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.
|
17.09% | -0.754 | 46.02% | 1.15x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMEIF
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -29.67% | -50.64% | -- | -- |
|
BQ
Boqii Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -17.81% | -25.13% | -- | -- |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
|
$33.4M | $12.1M | 8.03% | 10.53% | 6.29% | $22.8M |
|
HTHT
H World Group Ltd.
|
$402.9M | $281.5M | 8.23% | 33.36% | 28.95% | $209.3M |
|
JXG
JX Luxventure Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | 22.32% | 22.62% | -- | -- |
|
KNDI
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.
|
$9.4M | -$6.6M | -1.38% | -1.54% | -9.78% | -- |
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CMEIF or BQ?
Boqii Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -50.64% beat Boqii Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -25.13%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.-- -- $783.2M BQBoqii Holding Ltd.-- -- $44.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CMEIF or BQ?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Boqii Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27986.09%. Given that Boqii Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Boqii Holding Ltd. is more attractive than China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 BQBoqii Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CMEIF or BQ More Risky?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.020, which suggesting that the stock is 98.002% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boqii Holding Ltd. has a beta of -2.484, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 348.387%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMEIF or BQ?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. Boqii Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. pays 1.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Boqii Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMEIF or BQ?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Boqii Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Boqii Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.27x while Boqii Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. is 0.07x versus 7.55x for Boqii Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.0.07x 39.27x -- -- BQBoqii Holding Ltd.7.55x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CMEIF or CAAS?
China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 6.1%. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -50.64% beat China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.53%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.-- -- $783.2M CAASChina Automotive Systems, Inc.17.28% $0.32 $507.1M -
What do Analysts Say About CMEIF or CAAS?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Automotive Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 79.43%. Given that China Automotive Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd., analysts believe China Automotive Systems, Inc. is more attractive than China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CAASChina Automotive Systems, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CMEIF or CAAS More Risky?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.020, which suggesting that the stock is 98.002% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.83%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMEIF or CAAS?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. China Automotive Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. pays 1.97% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMEIF or CAAS?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $193.2M. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net income of $11.8M. Notably, China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.27x while China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. is 0.07x versus 0.17x for China Automotive Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.0.07x 39.27x -- -- CAASChina Automotive Systems, Inc.0.17x 3.77x $193.2M $11.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns CMEIF or HTHT?
H World Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 21.15%. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -50.64% beat H World Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 33.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.-- -- $783.2M HTHTH World Group Ltd.41.43% $0.63 $6.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CMEIF or HTHT?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand H World Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $51.34 which suggests that it could grow by 6.18%. Given that H World Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd., analysts believe H World Group Ltd. is more attractive than China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 HTHTH World Group Ltd.11 1 0 -
Is CMEIF or HTHT More Risky?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.020, which suggesting that the stock is 98.002% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.874%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMEIF or HTHT?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. H World Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. pays 1.97% of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group Ltd. pays out 120.75% of its earnings as a dividend. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but H World Group Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMEIF or HTHT?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than H World Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $972.6M. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than H World Group Ltd.'s net income of $205.7M. Notably, China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.27x while H World Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 27.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. is 0.07x versus 4.46x for H World Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.0.07x 39.27x -- -- HTHTH World Group Ltd.4.46x 27.99x $972.6M $205.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns CMEIF or JXG?
JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -50.64% beat JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.-- -- $783.2M JXGJX Luxventure Group, Inc.-- -- $18.3M -
What do Analysts Say About CMEIF or JXG?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than JX Luxventure Group, Inc., analysts believe China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than JX Luxventure Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 JXGJX Luxventure Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CMEIF or JXG More Risky?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.020, which suggesting that the stock is 98.002% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.948, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.151%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMEIF or JXG?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. JX Luxventure Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. pays 1.97% of its earnings as a dividend. JX Luxventure Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMEIF or JXG?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JX Luxventure Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.27x while JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. is 0.07x versus 0.03x for JX Luxventure Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.0.07x 39.27x -- -- JXGJX Luxventure Group, Inc.0.03x 0.84x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CMEIF or KNDI?
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -13.73%. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -50.64% beat Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.-- -- $783.2M KNDIKandi Technologies Group, Inc.31.3% -$0.05 $493.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CMEIF or KNDI?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 524.14%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. is more attractive than China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 KNDIKandi Technologies Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CMEIF or KNDI More Risky?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.020, which suggesting that the stock is 98.002% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.766%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMEIF or KNDI?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. pays 1.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMEIF or KNDI?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $29.9M. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.27x while Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. is 0.07x versus 0.54x for Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.0.07x 39.27x -- -- KNDIKandi Technologies Group, Inc.0.54x 58.83x $29.9M -$4.1M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 30
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 40.26% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 30
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 4.56% over the past day.
Buy
69
GDXU alert for Dec 30
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 3.19% over the past day.
