QD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -127.04% compared to Qudian, Inc.'s net margin of 15.23%. Qudian, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.95% beat Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.05%.

Qudian, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -77.89%. On the other hand Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $5.32 which suggests that it could grow by 64.29%. Given that Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Qudian, Inc., analysts believe Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Qudian, Inc..

Qudian, Inc. has a beta of 0.770, which suggesting that the stock is 23.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.751%.

Qudian, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 11.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Qudian, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd. pays out 17.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Qudian, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are smaller than Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $481.4M. Qudian, Inc.'s net income of $57.3M is lower than Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $73.3M. Notably, Qudian, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.23x while Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 2.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qudian, Inc. is 65.29x versus 0.31x for Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maase, Inc. has a net margin of -127.04% compared to Qudian, Inc.'s net margin of --. Qudian, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.95% beat Maase, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Qudian, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -77.89%. On the other hand Maase, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Qudian, Inc. has higher upside potential than Maase, Inc., analysts believe Qudian, Inc. is more attractive than Maase, Inc..

Qudian, Inc. has a beta of 0.770, which suggesting that the stock is 23.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maase, Inc. has a beta of -0.908, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 190.843%.

Qudian, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maase, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Qudian, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maase, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Qudian, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are larger than Maase, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Qudian, Inc.'s net income of $57.3M is higher than Maase, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Qudian, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.23x while Maase, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qudian, Inc. is 65.29x versus 2.02x for Maase, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qfin Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -127.04% compared to Qudian, Inc.'s net margin of 27.52%. Qudian, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.95% beat Qfin Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77%.

Qudian, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -77.89%. On the other hand Qfin Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $34.45 which suggests that it could grow by 81.51%. Given that Qfin Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Qudian, Inc., analysts believe Qfin Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Qudian, Inc..

Qudian, Inc. has a beta of 0.770, which suggesting that the stock is 23.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qfin Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.402, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.772%.

Qudian, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qfin Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 10.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Qudian, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qfin Holdings, Inc. pays out 22.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Qfin Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Qudian, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are smaller than Qfin Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $727.3M. Qudian, Inc.'s net income of $57.3M is lower than Qfin Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $200.1M. Notably, Qudian, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.23x while Qfin Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qudian, Inc. is 65.29x versus 0.97x for Qfin Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Waterdrop, Inc. has a net margin of -127.04% compared to Qudian, Inc.'s net margin of 16.73%. Qudian, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.95% beat Waterdrop, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.86%.

Qudian, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -77.89%. On the other hand Waterdrop, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.25 which suggests that it could grow by 18.44%. Given that Waterdrop, Inc. has higher upside potential than Qudian, Inc., analysts believe Waterdrop, Inc. is more attractive than Qudian, Inc..

Qudian, Inc. has a beta of 0.770, which suggesting that the stock is 23.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waterdrop, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Qudian, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Waterdrop, Inc. offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Qudian, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waterdrop, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Qudian, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are smaller than Waterdrop, Inc. quarterly revenues of $115.9M. Qudian, Inc.'s net income of $57.3M is higher than Waterdrop, Inc.'s net income of $19.4M. Notably, Qudian, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.23x while Waterdrop, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qudian, Inc. is 65.29x versus 1.74x for Waterdrop, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.