PBT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kinetik Holdings has a net margin of 89.97% compared to Permian Basin Royalty Trust's net margin of 4.21%. Permian Basin Royalty Trust's return on equity of 12983.51% beat Kinetik Holdings's return on equity of 8.48%.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kinetik Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $56.01 which suggests that it could grow by 34.78%. Given that Kinetik Holdings has higher upside potential than Permian Basin Royalty Trust, analysts believe Kinetik Holdings is more attractive than Permian Basin Royalty Trust.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.559, which suggesting that the stock is 44.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinetik Holdings has a beta of 3.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 203.074%.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.13%. Kinetik Holdings offers a yield of 7.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Permian Basin Royalty Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinetik Holdings pays out 71.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinetik Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are $3.8M, which are smaller than Kinetik Holdings quarterly revenues of $385.7M. Permian Basin Royalty Trust's net income of $3.4M is lower than Kinetik Holdings's net income of $16.2M. Notably, Permian Basin Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.47x while Kinetik Holdings's PE ratio is 40.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Permian Basin Royalty Trust is 17.26x versus 1.68x for Kinetik Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dorian LPG has a net margin of 89.97% compared to Permian Basin Royalty Trust's net margin of 26.48%. Permian Basin Royalty Trust's return on equity of 12983.51% beat Dorian LPG's return on equity of 15.26%.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dorian LPG has an analysts' consensus of $31.25 which suggests that it could grow by 41.98%. Given that Dorian LPG has higher upside potential than Permian Basin Royalty Trust, analysts believe Dorian LPG is more attractive than Permian Basin Royalty Trust.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.559, which suggesting that the stock is 44.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorian LPG has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.705%.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.13%. Dorian LPG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Permian Basin Royalty Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dorian LPG pays out 52.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorian LPG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are $3.8M, which are smaller than Dorian LPG quarterly revenues of $80.7M. Permian Basin Royalty Trust's net income of $3.4M is lower than Dorian LPG's net income of $21.4M. Notably, Permian Basin Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.47x while Dorian LPG's PE ratio is 5.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Permian Basin Royalty Trust is 17.26x versus 2.19x for Dorian LPG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a net margin of 89.97% compared to Permian Basin Royalty Trust's net margin of 0.29%. Permian Basin Royalty Trust's return on equity of 12983.51% beat Plains All American Pipeline LP's return on equity of 5.71%.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Plains All American Pipeline LP has an analysts' consensus of $21.40 which suggests that it could grow by 27.8%. Given that Plains All American Pipeline LP has higher upside potential than Permian Basin Royalty Trust, analysts believe Plains All American Pipeline LP is more attractive than Permian Basin Royalty Trust.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.559, which suggesting that the stock is 44.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains All American Pipeline LP has a beta of 0.703, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.659%.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.13%. Plains All American Pipeline LP offers a yield of 8.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Permian Basin Royalty Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plains All American Pipeline LP pays out 148.32% of its earnings as a dividend.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are $3.8M, which are smaller than Plains All American Pipeline LP quarterly revenues of $12.4B. Permian Basin Royalty Trust's net income of $3.4M is lower than Plains All American Pipeline LP's net income of $36M. Notably, Permian Basin Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.47x while Plains All American Pipeline LP's PE ratio is 22.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Permian Basin Royalty Trust is 17.26x versus 0.23x for Plains All American Pipeline LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan NRG has a net margin of 89.97% compared to Permian Basin Royalty Trust's net margin of --. Permian Basin Royalty Trust's return on equity of 12983.51% beat Titan NRG's return on equity of --.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Titan NRG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Permian Basin Royalty Trust has higher upside potential than Titan NRG, analysts believe Permian Basin Royalty Trust is more attractive than Titan NRG.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.559, which suggesting that the stock is 44.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan NRG has a beta of 1.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.396%.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.13%. Titan NRG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Permian Basin Royalty Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Titan NRG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are $3.8M, which are larger than Titan NRG quarterly revenues of --. Permian Basin Royalty Trust's net income of $3.4M is higher than Titan NRG's net income of --. Notably, Permian Basin Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.47x while Titan NRG's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Permian Basin Royalty Trust is 17.26x versus 0.31x for Titan NRG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.