KNTK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dorian LPG Ltd. has a net margin of 3.39% compared to Kinetik Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 44.64%. Kinetik Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.36% beat Dorian LPG Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.95%.

Kinetik Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $44.77, signalling upside risk potential of 21%. On the other hand Dorian LPG Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $32.40 which suggests that it could grow by 32.69%. Given that Dorian LPG Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kinetik Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Dorian LPG Ltd. is more attractive than Kinetik Holdings, Inc..

Kinetik Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.776, which suggesting that the stock is 22.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorian LPG Ltd. has a beta of 0.703, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.73%.

Kinetik Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.43%. Dorian LPG Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Kinetik Holdings, Inc. pays 297.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorian LPG Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kinetik Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $459.4M, which are larger than Dorian LPG Ltd. quarterly revenues of $124.1M. Kinetik Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $15.5M is lower than Dorian LPG Ltd.'s net income of $55.4M. Notably, Kinetik Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 91.20x while Dorian LPG Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinetik Holdings, Inc. is 1.32x versus 2.92x for Dorian LPG Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a net margin of 3.39% compared to Kinetik Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 3.92%. Kinetik Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.36% beat Plains All American Pipeline LP's return on equity of 10%.

Kinetik Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $44.77, signalling upside risk potential of 21%. On the other hand Plains All American Pipeline LP has an analysts' consensus of $20.44 which suggests that it could grow by 15.03%. Given that Kinetik Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Plains All American Pipeline LP, analysts believe Kinetik Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Plains All American Pipeline LP.

Kinetik Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.776, which suggesting that the stock is 22.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains All American Pipeline LP has a beta of 0.591, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.927%.

Kinetik Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.43%. Plains All American Pipeline LP offers a yield of 8.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Kinetik Holdings, Inc. pays 297.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains All American Pipeline LP pays out 173.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinetik Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $459.4M, which are smaller than Plains All American Pipeline LP quarterly revenues of $11.6B. Kinetik Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $15.5M is lower than Plains All American Pipeline LP's net income of $453M. Notably, Kinetik Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 91.20x while Plains All American Pipeline LP's PE ratio is 14.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinetik Holdings, Inc. is 1.32x versus 0.27x for Plains All American Pipeline LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a net margin of 3.39% compared to Kinetik Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 94.34%. Kinetik Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.36% beat Permian Basin Royalty Trust's return on equity of 9107.95%.

Kinetik Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $44.77, signalling upside risk potential of 21%. On the other hand Permian Basin Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kinetik Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Permian Basin Royalty Trust, analysts believe Kinetik Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Permian Basin Royalty Trust.

Kinetik Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.776, which suggesting that the stock is 22.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.795%.

Kinetik Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.43%. Permian Basin Royalty Trust offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Kinetik Holdings, Inc. pays 297.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Permian Basin Royalty Trust pays out 100% of its earnings as a dividend. Permian Basin Royalty Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kinetik Holdings, Inc.'s is not.

Kinetik Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $459.4M, which are larger than Permian Basin Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $7.3M. Kinetik Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $15.5M is higher than Permian Basin Royalty Trust's net income of $6.9M. Notably, Kinetik Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 91.20x while Permian Basin Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 56.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinetik Holdings, Inc. is 1.32x versus 49.86x for Permian Basin Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan NRG, Inc. has a net margin of 3.39% compared to Kinetik Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Kinetik Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.36% beat Titan NRG, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Kinetik Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $44.77, signalling upside risk potential of 21%. On the other hand Titan NRG, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kinetik Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Titan NRG, Inc., analysts believe Kinetik Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Titan NRG, Inc..

Kinetik Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.776, which suggesting that the stock is 22.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan NRG, Inc. has a beta of -0.206, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.562%.

Kinetik Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.43%. Titan NRG, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinetik Holdings, Inc. pays 297.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan NRG, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kinetik Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $459.4M, which are larger than Titan NRG, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Kinetik Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $15.5M is higher than Titan NRG, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Kinetik Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 91.20x while Titan NRG, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinetik Holdings, Inc. is 1.32x versus 0.71x for Titan NRG, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.