INSW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dorian LPG has a net margin of 40.72% compared to International Seaways's net margin of 11.44%. International Seaways's return on equity of 28.74% beat Dorian LPG's return on equity of 23.34%.

International Seaways has a consensus price target of $71.63, signalling upside risk potential of 100.97%. On the other hand Dorian LPG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 65.43%. Given that International Seaways has higher upside potential than Dorian LPG, analysts believe International Seaways is more attractive than Dorian LPG.

International Seaways has a beta of -0.119, which suggesting that the stock is 111.915% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorian LPG has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.37199999999999%.

International Seaways has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.05%. Dorian LPG offers a yield of 17.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. International Seaways pays 55.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorian LPG pays out 52.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

International Seaways quarterly revenues are $225.2M, which are larger than Dorian LPG quarterly revenues of $82.4M. International Seaways's net income of $91.7M is higher than Dorian LPG's net income of $9.4M. Notably, International Seaways's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.15x while Dorian LPG's PE ratio is 3.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Seaways is 1.60x versus 1.89x for Dorian LPG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a net margin of 40.72% compared to International Seaways's net margin of 1.73%. International Seaways's return on equity of 28.74% beat Plains All American Pipeline LP's return on equity of 7.7%.

International Seaways has a consensus price target of $71.63, signalling upside risk potential of 100.97%. On the other hand Plains All American Pipeline LP has an analysts' consensus of $20.22 which suggests that it could grow by 19.38%. Given that International Seaways has higher upside potential than Plains All American Pipeline LP, analysts believe International Seaways is more attractive than Plains All American Pipeline LP.

International Seaways has a beta of -0.119, which suggesting that the stock is 111.915% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains All American Pipeline LP has a beta of 1.636, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.614%.

International Seaways has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.05%. Plains All American Pipeline LP offers a yield of 7.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. International Seaways pays 55.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains All American Pipeline LP pays out 80.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

International Seaways quarterly revenues are $225.2M, which are smaller than Plains All American Pipeline LP quarterly revenues of $12.7B. International Seaways's net income of $91.7M is lower than Plains All American Pipeline LP's net income of $220M. Notably, International Seaways's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.15x while Plains All American Pipeline LP's PE ratio is 14.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Seaways is 1.60x versus 0.24x for Plains All American Pipeline LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a net margin of 40.72% compared to International Seaways's net margin of 95.63%. International Seaways's return on equity of 28.74% beat Permian Basin Royalty Trust's return on equity of 18616.53%.

International Seaways has a consensus price target of $71.63, signalling upside risk potential of 100.97%. On the other hand Permian Basin Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that International Seaways has higher upside potential than Permian Basin Royalty Trust, analysts believe International Seaways is more attractive than Permian Basin Royalty Trust.

International Seaways has a beta of -0.119, which suggesting that the stock is 111.915% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.662, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.815%.

International Seaways has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.05%. Permian Basin Royalty Trust offers a yield of 5.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. International Seaways pays 55.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Permian Basin Royalty Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Seaways's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

International Seaways quarterly revenues are $225.2M, which are larger than Permian Basin Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $8.4M. International Seaways's net income of $91.7M is higher than Permian Basin Royalty Trust's net income of $8.1M. Notably, International Seaways's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.15x while Permian Basin Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 14.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Seaways is 1.60x versus 13.80x for Permian Basin Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan NRG has a net margin of 40.72% compared to International Seaways's net margin of --. International Seaways's return on equity of 28.74% beat Titan NRG's return on equity of --.

International Seaways has a consensus price target of $71.63, signalling upside risk potential of 100.97%. On the other hand Titan NRG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that International Seaways has higher upside potential than Titan NRG, analysts believe International Seaways is more attractive than Titan NRG.

International Seaways has a beta of -0.119, which suggesting that the stock is 111.915% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan NRG has a beta of 0.197, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.257%.

International Seaways has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.05%. Titan NRG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Seaways pays 55.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan NRG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Seaways's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

International Seaways quarterly revenues are $225.2M, which are larger than Titan NRG quarterly revenues of --. International Seaways's net income of $91.7M is higher than Titan NRG's net income of --. Notably, International Seaways's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.15x while Titan NRG's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Seaways is 1.60x versus 0.63x for Titan NRG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.