NTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Mosaic has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Nutrien's net margin of 6%. Nutrien's return on equity of 2.7% beat The Mosaic's return on equity of 1.46%.

Nutrien has a consensus price target of $60.51, signalling upside risk potential of 27.65%. On the other hand The Mosaic has an analysts' consensus of $32.51 which suggests that it could grow by 38.64%. Given that The Mosaic has higher upside potential than Nutrien, analysts believe The Mosaic is more attractive than Nutrien.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.779, which suggesting that the stock is 22.052% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Mosaic has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.186%.

Nutrien has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. The Mosaic offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Nutrien pays 157.27% of its earnings as a dividend. The Mosaic pays out 154.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nutrien quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than The Mosaic quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Nutrien's net income of $113M is lower than The Mosaic's net income of $169M. Notably, Nutrien's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.60x while The Mosaic's PE ratio is 42.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien is 0.90x versus 0.68x for The Mosaic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ArcelorMittal SA has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Nutrien's net margin of -2.65%. Nutrien's return on equity of 2.7% beat ArcelorMittal SA's return on equity of 2.46%.

Nutrien has a consensus price target of $60.51, signalling upside risk potential of 27.65%. On the other hand ArcelorMittal SA has an analysts' consensus of $31.56 which suggests that it could grow by 27.57%. Given that Nutrien has higher upside potential than ArcelorMittal SA, analysts believe Nutrien is more attractive than ArcelorMittal SA.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.779, which suggesting that the stock is 22.052% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ArcelorMittal SA has a beta of 1.600, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.033%.

Nutrien has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. ArcelorMittal SA offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Nutrien pays 157.27% of its earnings as a dividend. ArcelorMittal SA pays out 29.35% of its earnings as a dividend. ArcelorMittal SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Nutrien's is not.

Nutrien quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are smaller than ArcelorMittal SA quarterly revenues of $14.7B. Nutrien's net income of $113M is higher than ArcelorMittal SA's net income of -$390M. Notably, Nutrien's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.60x while ArcelorMittal SA's PE ratio is 14.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien is 0.90x versus 0.31x for ArcelorMittal SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Scotts Miracle Gro has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Nutrien's net margin of -16.68%. Nutrien's return on equity of 2.7% beat The Scotts Miracle Gro's return on equity of --.

Nutrien has a consensus price target of $60.51, signalling upside risk potential of 27.65%. On the other hand The Scotts Miracle Gro has an analysts' consensus of $77.63 which suggests that it could grow by 50.99%. Given that The Scotts Miracle Gro has higher upside potential than Nutrien, analysts believe The Scotts Miracle Gro is more attractive than Nutrien.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.779, which suggesting that the stock is 22.052% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Scotts Miracle Gro has a beta of 1.963, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.295%.

Nutrien has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. The Scotts Miracle Gro offers a yield of 5.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Nutrien pays 157.27% of its earnings as a dividend. The Scotts Miracle Gro pays out -433.52% of its earnings as a dividend.

Nutrien quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than The Scotts Miracle Gro quarterly revenues of $416.8M. Nutrien's net income of $113M is higher than The Scotts Miracle Gro's net income of -$69.5M. Notably, Nutrien's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.60x while The Scotts Miracle Gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien is 0.90x versus 0.83x for The Scotts Miracle Gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVR Partners LP has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Nutrien's net margin of 13.11%. Nutrien's return on equity of 2.7% beat CVR Partners LP's return on equity of 20.51%.

Nutrien has a consensus price target of $60.51, signalling upside risk potential of 27.65%. On the other hand CVR Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -86.35%. Given that Nutrien has higher upside potential than CVR Partners LP, analysts believe Nutrien is more attractive than CVR Partners LP.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.779, which suggesting that the stock is 22.052% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVR Partners LP has a beta of 0.886, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.414%.

Nutrien has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. CVR Partners LP offers a yield of 9.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share. Nutrien pays 157.27% of its earnings as a dividend. CVR Partners LP pays out 116.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nutrien quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than CVR Partners LP quarterly revenues of $139.6M. Nutrien's net income of $113M is higher than CVR Partners LP's net income of $18.3M. Notably, Nutrien's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.60x while CVR Partners LP's PE ratio is 12.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien is 0.90x versus 1.40x for CVR Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.