NTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of --. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.41% beat Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9491.01%.

Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $65.74, signalling upside risk potential of 9.43%. On the other hand Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nutrien Ltd. has higher upside potential than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Nutrien Ltd. is more attractive than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc..

Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 0.727, which suggesting that the stock is 27.307% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 8.425, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 742.471%.

Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.62%. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 159.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $20.3K. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $469M is higher than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $21.2M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.19x while Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.10x versus 1,174.58x for Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of 3.66%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.41% beat Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.96%.

Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $65.74, signalling upside risk potential of 9.43%. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 61.05%. Given that Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe Flexible Solutions International, Inc. is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..

Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 0.727, which suggesting that the stock is 27.307% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.501%.

Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.62%. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 159.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Flexible Solutions International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.6M. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $469M is higher than Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s net income of $386.7K. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.19x while Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 47.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.10x versus 2.26x for Flexible Solutions International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intrepid Potash, Inc. has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of 7.04%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.41% beat Intrepid Potash, Inc.'s return on equity of -37.45%.

Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $65.74, signalling upside risk potential of 9.43%. On the other hand Intrepid Potash, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could fall by -10.85%. Given that Nutrien Ltd. has higher upside potential than Intrepid Potash, Inc., analysts believe Nutrien Ltd. is more attractive than Intrepid Potash, Inc..

Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 0.727, which suggesting that the stock is 27.307% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intrepid Potash, Inc. has a beta of 1.785, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.541%.

Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.62%. Intrepid Potash, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 159.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Intrepid Potash, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Intrepid Potash, Inc. quarterly revenues of $53.2M. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $469M is higher than Intrepid Potash, Inc.'s net income of $3.7M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.19x while Intrepid Potash, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.10x versus 1.21x for Intrepid Potash, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Mosaic Co. has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of 12.29%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.41% beat The Mosaic Co.'s return on equity of 10.32%.

Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $65.74, signalling upside risk potential of 9.43%. On the other hand The Mosaic Co. has an analysts' consensus of $34.33 which suggests that it could grow by 41.79%. Given that The Mosaic Co. has higher upside potential than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe The Mosaic Co. is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..

Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 0.727, which suggesting that the stock is 27.307% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Mosaic Co. has a beta of 0.941, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.861%.

Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.62%. The Mosaic Co. offers a yield of 3.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 159.36% of its earnings as a dividend. The Mosaic Co. pays out 154.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than The Mosaic Co. quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $469M is higher than The Mosaic Co.'s net income of $424.1M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.19x while The Mosaic Co.'s PE ratio is 6.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.10x versus 0.65x for The Mosaic Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.