NTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CF Industries Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 10.86% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of 26.44%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.25% beat CF Industries Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.55%.

Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $74.35, signalling downside risk potential of -0.96%. On the other hand CF Industries Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $96.68 which suggests that it could fall by -2.87%. Given that CF Industries Holdings, Inc. has more downside risk than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe Nutrien Ltd. is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings, Inc..

Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.353% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CF Industries Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.704, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.65%.

Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. CF Industries Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 46.58% of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings, Inc. pays out 22.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than CF Industries Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $580M is higher than CF Industries Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $495M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.10x while CF Industries Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.36x versus 2.28x for CF Industries Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 10.86% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of --. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.25% beat Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9491.01%.

Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $74.35, signalling downside risk potential of -0.96%. On the other hand Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nutrien Ltd. has higher upside potential than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Nutrien Ltd. is more attractive than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc..

Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.353% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 8.484, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 748.414%.

Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 46.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nutrien Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $20.3K. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $580M is higher than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $21.2M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.10x while Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.36x versus 181.43x for Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intrepid Potash, Inc. has a net margin of 10.86% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of 7.04%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.25% beat Intrepid Potash, Inc.'s return on equity of -37.45%.

Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $74.35, signalling downside risk potential of -0.96%. On the other hand Intrepid Potash, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could fall by -35.08%. Given that Intrepid Potash, Inc. has more downside risk than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe Nutrien Ltd. is more attractive than Intrepid Potash, Inc..

Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.353% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intrepid Potash, Inc. has a beta of 1.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.602%.

Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Intrepid Potash, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 46.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Intrepid Potash, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nutrien Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Intrepid Potash, Inc. quarterly revenues of $53.2M. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $580M is higher than Intrepid Potash, Inc.'s net income of $3.7M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.10x while Intrepid Potash, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.36x versus 1.74x for Intrepid Potash, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Mosaic Co. has a net margin of 10.86% compared to Nutrien Ltd.'s net margin of -17.36%. Nutrien Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.25% beat The Mosaic Co.'s return on equity of 4.71%.

Nutrien Ltd. has a consensus price target of $74.35, signalling downside risk potential of -0.96%. On the other hand The Mosaic Co. has an analysts' consensus of $31.80 which suggests that it could grow by 14.22%. Given that The Mosaic Co. has higher upside potential than Nutrien Ltd., analysts believe The Mosaic Co. is more attractive than Nutrien Ltd..

Nutrien Ltd. has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.353% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Mosaic Co. has a beta of 0.972, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.822%.

Nutrien Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. The Mosaic Co. offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Nutrien Ltd. pays 46.58% of its earnings as a dividend. The Mosaic Co. pays out 51.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nutrien Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than The Mosaic Co. quarterly revenues of $3B. Nutrien Ltd.'s net income of $580M is higher than The Mosaic Co.'s net income of -$516.2M. Notably, Nutrien Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.10x while The Mosaic Co.'s PE ratio is 16.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien Ltd. is 1.36x versus 0.74x for The Mosaic Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.