MFA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. has a net margin of 26.26% compared to MFA Financial, Inc.'s net margin of -59.97%. MFA Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.94% beat Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.1%.

MFA Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $14.45, signalling upside risk potential of 50.36%. On the other hand Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.59%. Given that MFA Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc., analysts believe MFA Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc..

MFA Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.611, which suggesting that the stock is 61.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MFA Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.88%. Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. MFA Financial, Inc. pays 171.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. pays out 60.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MFA Financial, Inc.'s is not.

MFA Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $182.5M, which are larger than Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues of $16.6M. MFA Financial, Inc.'s net income of $47.9M is higher than Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc.'s net income of -$10M. Notably, MFA Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.29x while Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MFA Financial, Inc. is 1.32x versus 0.58x for Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lineage, Inc. has a net margin of 26.26% compared to MFA Financial, Inc.'s net margin of -8.13%. MFA Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.94% beat Lineage, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.03%.

MFA Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $14.45, signalling upside risk potential of 50.36%. On the other hand Lineage, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $43.28 which suggests that it could grow by 22.5%. Given that MFA Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lineage, Inc., analysts believe MFA Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Lineage, Inc..

MFA Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.611, which suggesting that the stock is 61.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lineage, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MFA Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.88%. Lineage, Inc. offers a yield of 5.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. MFA Financial, Inc. pays 171.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Lineage, Inc. pays out 30.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Lineage, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MFA Financial, Inc.'s is not.

MFA Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $182.5M, which are smaller than Lineage, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. MFA Financial, Inc.'s net income of $47.9M is higher than Lineage, Inc.'s net income of -$112M. Notably, MFA Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.29x while Lineage, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MFA Financial, Inc. is 1.32x versus 1.51x for Lineage, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a net margin of 26.26% compared to MFA Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 24.09%. MFA Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.94% beat Seven Hills Realty Trust's return on equity of 5.72%.

MFA Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $14.45, signalling upside risk potential of 50.36%. On the other hand Seven Hills Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 46.71%. Given that MFA Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Seven Hills Realty Trust, analysts believe MFA Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Seven Hills Realty Trust.

MFA Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.611, which suggesting that the stock is 61.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seven Hills Realty Trust has a beta of 0.551, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.907%.

MFA Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.88%. Seven Hills Realty Trust offers a yield of 14.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. MFA Financial, Inc. pays 171.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Seven Hills Realty Trust pays out 116.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MFA Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $182.5M, which are larger than Seven Hills Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $14.1M. MFA Financial, Inc.'s net income of $47.9M is higher than Seven Hills Realty Trust's net income of $3.4M. Notably, MFA Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.29x while Seven Hills Realty Trust's PE ratio is 8.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MFA Financial, Inc. is 1.32x versus 2.17x for Seven Hills Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strawberry Fields REIT, Inc. has a net margin of 26.26% compared to MFA Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 22.34%. MFA Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.94% beat Strawberry Fields REIT, Inc.'s return on equity of 43.77%.

MFA Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $14.45, signalling upside risk potential of 50.36%. On the other hand Strawberry Fields REIT, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.71 which suggests that it could grow by 3.35%. Given that MFA Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Strawberry Fields REIT, Inc., analysts believe MFA Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Strawberry Fields REIT, Inc..

MFA Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.611, which suggesting that the stock is 61.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strawberry Fields REIT, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MFA Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.88%. Strawberry Fields REIT, Inc. offers a yield of 4.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. MFA Financial, Inc. pays 171.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT, Inc. pays out 90.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MFA Financial, Inc.'s is not.

MFA Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $182.5M, which are larger than Strawberry Fields REIT, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39.7M. MFA Financial, Inc.'s net income of $47.9M is higher than Strawberry Fields REIT, Inc.'s net income of $8.9M. Notably, MFA Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.29x while Strawberry Fields REIT, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MFA Financial, Inc. is 1.32x versus 1.05x for Strawberry Fields REIT, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.