LC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

SoFi Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 10.56% compared to LendingClub Corp.'s net margin of 13%. LendingClub Corp.'s return on equity of 9.59% beat SoFi Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.12%.

LendingClub Corp. has a consensus price target of $24.20, signalling upside risk potential of 74.48%. On the other hand SoFi Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $26.50 which suggests that it could grow by 50.31%. Given that LendingClub Corp. has higher upside potential than SoFi Technologies, Inc., analysts believe LendingClub Corp. is more attractive than SoFi Technologies, Inc..

LendingClub Corp. has a beta of 2.111, which suggesting that the stock is 111.078% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoFi Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.53%.

LendingClub Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SoFi Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LendingClub Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoFi Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LendingClub Corp. quarterly revenues are $393.5M, which are smaller than SoFi Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. LendingClub Corp.'s net income of $41.6M is lower than SoFi Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $173.5M. Notably, LendingClub Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.01x while SoFi Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 46.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LendingClub Corp. is 1.11x versus 4.63x for SoFi Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. has a net margin of 10.56% compared to LendingClub Corp.'s net margin of 19.84%. LendingClub Corp.'s return on equity of 9.59% beat Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.4%.

LendingClub Corp. has a consensus price target of $24.20, signalling upside risk potential of 74.48%. On the other hand Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $105.43 which suggests that it could grow by 14.56%. Given that LendingClub Corp. has higher upside potential than Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc., analysts believe LendingClub Corp. is more attractive than Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc..

LendingClub Corp. has a beta of 2.111, which suggesting that the stock is 111.078% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. has a beta of 0.656, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.423%.

LendingClub Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LendingClub Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LendingClub Corp. quarterly revenues are $393.5M, which are smaller than Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. quarterly revenues of $507.4M. LendingClub Corp.'s net income of $41.6M is lower than Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.'s net income of $100.7M. Notably, LendingClub Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.01x while Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LendingClub Corp. is 1.11x versus 2.12x for Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upstart Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 10.56% compared to LendingClub Corp.'s net margin of 6.29%. LendingClub Corp.'s return on equity of 9.59% beat Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.5%.

LendingClub Corp. has a consensus price target of $24.20, signalling upside risk potential of 74.48%. On the other hand Upstart Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $48.50 which suggests that it could grow by 74.52%. Given that Upstart Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than LendingClub Corp., analysts believe Upstart Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than LendingClub Corp..

LendingClub Corp. has a beta of 2.111, which suggesting that the stock is 111.078% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upstart Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 143.871%.

LendingClub Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upstart Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LendingClub Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upstart Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LendingClub Corp. quarterly revenues are $393.5M, which are larger than Upstart Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $296.1M. LendingClub Corp.'s net income of $41.6M is higher than Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $18.6M. Notably, LendingClub Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.01x while Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 64.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LendingClub Corp. is 1.11x versus 2.79x for Upstart Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valley National Bancorp has a net margin of 10.56% compared to LendingClub Corp.'s net margin of 21.9%. LendingClub Corp.'s return on equity of 9.59% beat Valley National Bancorp's return on equity of 7.87%.

LendingClub Corp. has a consensus price target of $24.20, signalling upside risk potential of 74.48%. On the other hand Valley National Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $14.96 which suggests that it could grow by 25.54%. Given that LendingClub Corp. has higher upside potential than Valley National Bancorp, analysts believe LendingClub Corp. is more attractive than Valley National Bancorp.

LendingClub Corp. has a beta of 2.111, which suggesting that the stock is 111.078% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valley National Bancorp has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.459%.

LendingClub Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Valley National Bancorp offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. LendingClub Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Valley National Bancorp pays out 43.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Valley National Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LendingClub Corp. quarterly revenues are $393.5M, which are smaller than Valley National Bancorp quarterly revenues of $892.1M. LendingClub Corp.'s net income of $41.6M is lower than Valley National Bancorp's net income of $195.4M. Notably, LendingClub Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.01x while Valley National Bancorp's PE ratio is 11.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LendingClub Corp. is 1.11x versus 1.92x for Valley National Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.