LANV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 6.1%. Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -72.97% beat China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.53%.

Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling downside risk potential of -18.13%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 76.47%. Given that China Automotive Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd., analysts believe China Automotive Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd..

Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.83%.

Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $193.2M. Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net income of $11.8M. Notably, Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.60x versus 0.18x for China Automotive Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H World Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 21.15%. Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -72.97% beat H World Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 33.36%.

Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling downside risk potential of -18.13%. On the other hand H World Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $51.34 which suggests that it could grow by 5.41%. Given that H World Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd., analysts believe H World Group Ltd. is more attractive than Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd..

Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.874%.

Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H World Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group Ltd. pays out 120.75% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than H World Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $972.6M. Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than H World Group Ltd.'s net income of $205.7M. Notably, Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while H World Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 28.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.60x versus 4.48x for H World Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -72.97% beat JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.62%.

Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling downside risk potential of -18.13%. On the other hand JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than JX Luxventure Group, Inc., analysts believe Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than JX Luxventure Group, Inc..

Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.948, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.151%.

Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JX Luxventure Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JX Luxventure Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JX Luxventure Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.60x versus 0.04x for JX Luxventure Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -13.73%. Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -72.97% beat Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.54%.

Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling downside risk potential of -18.13%. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 484.8%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. is more attractive than Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd..

Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.766%.

Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $29.9M. Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.60x versus 0.58x for Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.