KRP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enterprise Products Partners LP has a net margin of 30.54% compared to Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's net margin of 10.29%. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's return on equity of 5.85% beat Enterprise Products Partners LP's return on equity of 20.39%.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.79%. On the other hand Enterprise Products Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $34.95 which suggests that it could grow by 12.78%. Given that Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has higher upside potential than Enterprise Products Partners LP, analysts believe Kimbell Royalty Partners LP is more attractive than Enterprise Products Partners LP.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enterprise Products Partners LP has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.931%.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.36%. Enterprise Products Partners LP offers a yield of 6.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP pays 230.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Enterprise Products Partners LP pays out 77.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Enterprise Products Partners LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's is not.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP quarterly revenues are $74.2M, which are smaller than Enterprise Products Partners LP quarterly revenues of $13.8B. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's net income of $22.7M is lower than Enterprise Products Partners LP's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.22x while Enterprise Products Partners LP's PE ratio is 11.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimbell Royalty Partners LP is 5.52x versus 1.20x for Enterprise Products Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Oil & Gas has a net margin of 30.54% compared to Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's net margin of 57.9%. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's return on equity of 5.85% beat Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 42.56%.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.79%. On the other hand Northern Oil & Gas has an analysts' consensus of $48.79 which suggests that it could grow by 37.17%. Given that Northern Oil & Gas has higher upside potential than Kimbell Royalty Partners LP, analysts believe Northern Oil & Gas is more attractive than Kimbell Royalty Partners LP.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.851, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.144%.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.36%. Northern Oil & Gas offers a yield of 4.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP pays 230.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas pays out 13.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's is not.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP quarterly revenues are $74.2M, which are smaller than Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues of $515.5M. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's net income of $22.7M is lower than Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $298.4M. Notably, Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.22x while Northern Oil & Gas's PE ratio is 4.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimbell Royalty Partners LP is 5.52x versus 1.66x for Northern Oil & Gas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Permian Resources has a net margin of 30.54% compared to Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's net margin of 31.79%. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's return on equity of 5.85% beat Permian Resources's return on equity of 11.48%.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.79%. On the other hand Permian Resources has an analysts' consensus of $18.84 which suggests that it could grow by 38.55%. Given that Permian Resources has higher upside potential than Kimbell Royalty Partners LP, analysts believe Permian Resources is more attractive than Kimbell Royalty Partners LP.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Permian Resources has a beta of 4.346, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 334.64%.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.36%. Permian Resources offers a yield of 5.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP pays 230.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Permian Resources pays out 29.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Permian Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's is not.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP quarterly revenues are $74.2M, which are smaller than Permian Resources quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's net income of $22.7M is lower than Permian Resources's net income of $386.4M. Notably, Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.22x while Permian Resources's PE ratio is 8.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimbell Royalty Partners LP is 5.52x versus 1.75x for Permian Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sitio Royalties has a net margin of 30.54% compared to Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's net margin of 8.41%. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's return on equity of 5.85% beat Sitio Royalties's return on equity of -0.11%.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.79%. On the other hand Sitio Royalties has an analysts' consensus of $28.83 which suggests that it could grow by 47.81%. Given that Sitio Royalties has higher upside potential than Kimbell Royalty Partners LP, analysts believe Sitio Royalties is more attractive than Kimbell Royalty Partners LP.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sitio Royalties has a beta of 1.739, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.868%.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.36%. Sitio Royalties offers a yield of 8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP pays 230.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Sitio Royalties pays out -1042.42% of its earnings as a dividend.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP quarterly revenues are $74.2M, which are smaller than Sitio Royalties quarterly revenues of $149.4M. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's net income of $22.7M is higher than Sitio Royalties's net income of $12.6M. Notably, Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.22x while Sitio Royalties's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimbell Royalty Partners LP is 5.52x versus 2.47x for Sitio Royalties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.