KODK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cintas has a net margin of 9.77% compared to Eastman Kodak's net margin of 17.76%. Eastman Kodak's return on equity of 9.58% beat Cintas's return on equity of 41.44%.

Eastman Kodak has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cintas has an analysts' consensus of $209.54 which suggests that it could grow by 0.65%. Given that Cintas has higher upside potential than Eastman Kodak, analysts believe Cintas is more attractive than Eastman Kodak.

Eastman Kodak has a beta of 3.668, which suggesting that the stock is 266.836% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cintas has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.05%.

Eastman Kodak has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cintas offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Eastman Kodak pays 3.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas pays out 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Kodak quarterly revenues are $266M, which are smaller than Cintas quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Eastman Kodak's net income of $26M is lower than Cintas's net income of $463.5M. Notably, Eastman Kodak's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.31x while Cintas's PE ratio is 48.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Kodak is 0.56x versus 8.44x for Cintas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resources Connection has a net margin of 9.77% compared to Eastman Kodak's net margin of -34.03%. Eastman Kodak's return on equity of 9.58% beat Resources Connection's return on equity of -29.28%.

Eastman Kodak has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Resources Connection has an analysts' consensus of $9.67 which suggests that it could grow by 79.01%. Given that Resources Connection has higher upside potential than Eastman Kodak, analysts believe Resources Connection is more attractive than Eastman Kodak.

Eastman Kodak has a beta of 3.668, which suggesting that the stock is 266.836% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Connection has a beta of 0.603, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.728%.

Eastman Kodak has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Resources Connection offers a yield of 10.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Eastman Kodak pays 3.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection pays out 89.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Kodak quarterly revenues are $266M, which are larger than Resources Connection quarterly revenues of $129.4M. Eastman Kodak's net income of $26M is higher than Resources Connection's net income of -$44.1M. Notably, Eastman Kodak's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.31x while Resources Connection's PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Kodak is 0.56x versus 0.32x for Resources Connection. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPAR Group has a net margin of 9.77% compared to Eastman Kodak's net margin of -0.38%. Eastman Kodak's return on equity of 9.58% beat SPAR Group's return on equity of 33.96%.

Eastman Kodak has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPAR Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 536.36%. Given that SPAR Group has higher upside potential than Eastman Kodak, analysts believe SPAR Group is more attractive than Eastman Kodak.

Eastman Kodak has a beta of 3.668, which suggesting that the stock is 266.836% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPAR Group has a beta of 0.470, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53%.

Eastman Kodak has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPAR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eastman Kodak pays 3.92% of its earnings as a dividend. SPAR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Kodak's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Kodak quarterly revenues are $266M, which are larger than SPAR Group quarterly revenues of $37.8M. Eastman Kodak's net income of $26M is higher than SPAR Group's net income of -$144K. Notably, Eastman Kodak's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.31x while SPAR Group's PE ratio is 2.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Kodak is 0.56x versus 0.12x for SPAR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verisk Analytics has a net margin of 9.77% compared to Eastman Kodak's net margin of 28.59%. Eastman Kodak's return on equity of 9.58% beat Verisk Analytics's return on equity of 329.21%.

Eastman Kodak has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Verisk Analytics has an analysts' consensus of $293.61 which suggests that it could fall by -0.49%. Given that Verisk Analytics has higher upside potential than Eastman Kodak, analysts believe Verisk Analytics is more attractive than Eastman Kodak.

Eastman Kodak has a beta of 3.668, which suggesting that the stock is 266.836% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.877, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.256%.

Eastman Kodak has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verisk Analytics offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Eastman Kodak pays 3.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Verisk Analytics pays out 23.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Kodak quarterly revenues are $266M, which are smaller than Verisk Analytics quarterly revenues of $735.6M. Eastman Kodak's net income of $26M is lower than Verisk Analytics's net income of $210.3M. Notably, Eastman Kodak's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.31x while Verisk Analytics's PE ratio is 44.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Kodak is 0.56x versus 14.63x for Verisk Analytics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.