KODK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cintas has a net margin of 6.9% compared to Eastman Kodak's net margin of 17.51%. Eastman Kodak's return on equity of 7.19% beat Cintas's return on equity of 41.05%.

Eastman Kodak has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cintas has an analysts' consensus of $199.75 which suggests that it could grow by 6.05%. Given that Cintas has higher upside potential than Eastman Kodak, analysts believe Cintas is more attractive than Eastman Kodak.

Eastman Kodak has a beta of 3.728, which suggesting that the stock is 272.8% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cintas has a beta of 1.335, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.538%.

Eastman Kodak has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cintas offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Eastman Kodak pays 5.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas pays out 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Kodak quarterly revenues are $261M, which are smaller than Cintas quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Eastman Kodak's net income of $18M is lower than Cintas's net income of $448.5M. Notably, Eastman Kodak's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.07x while Cintas's PE ratio is 45.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Kodak is 0.62x versus 7.80x for Cintas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resources Connection has a net margin of 6.9% compared to Eastman Kodak's net margin of 7.07%. Eastman Kodak's return on equity of 7.19% beat Resources Connection's return on equity of 5.06%.

Eastman Kodak has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Resources Connection has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 61.64%. Given that Resources Connection has higher upside potential than Eastman Kodak, analysts believe Resources Connection is more attractive than Eastman Kodak.

Eastman Kodak has a beta of 3.728, which suggesting that the stock is 272.8% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Connection has a beta of 0.679, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.136%.

Eastman Kodak has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Resources Connection offers a yield of 6.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Eastman Kodak pays 5.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection pays out 89.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Kodak quarterly revenues are $261M, which are larger than Resources Connection quarterly revenues of $148.2M. Eastman Kodak's net income of $18M is higher than Resources Connection's net income of $10.5M. Notably, Eastman Kodak's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.07x while Resources Connection's PE ratio is 22.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Kodak is 0.62x versus 0.46x for Resources Connection. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPAR Group has a net margin of 6.9% compared to Eastman Kodak's net margin of -0.38%. Eastman Kodak's return on equity of 7.19% beat SPAR Group's return on equity of 33.96%.

Eastman Kodak has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPAR Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 274.33%. Given that SPAR Group has higher upside potential than Eastman Kodak, analysts believe SPAR Group is more attractive than Eastman Kodak.

Eastman Kodak has a beta of 3.728, which suggesting that the stock is 272.8% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPAR Group has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.763%.

Eastman Kodak has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPAR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eastman Kodak pays 5.33% of its earnings as a dividend. SPAR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Kodak's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Kodak quarterly revenues are $261M, which are larger than SPAR Group quarterly revenues of $37.8M. Eastman Kodak's net income of $18M is higher than SPAR Group's net income of -$144K. Notably, Eastman Kodak's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.07x while SPAR Group's PE ratio is 3.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Kodak is 0.62x versus 0.20x for SPAR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verisk Analytics has a net margin of 6.9% compared to Eastman Kodak's net margin of 30.33%. Eastman Kodak's return on equity of 7.19% beat Verisk Analytics's return on equity of 264.01%.

Eastman Kodak has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Verisk Analytics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.06%. Given that Verisk Analytics has higher upside potential than Eastman Kodak, analysts believe Verisk Analytics is more attractive than Eastman Kodak.

Eastman Kodak has a beta of 3.728, which suggesting that the stock is 272.8% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.411%.

Eastman Kodak has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verisk Analytics offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Eastman Kodak pays 5.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Verisk Analytics pays out 32.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Kodak quarterly revenues are $261M, which are smaller than Verisk Analytics quarterly revenues of $725.3M. Eastman Kodak's net income of $18M is lower than Verisk Analytics's net income of $220M. Notably, Eastman Kodak's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.07x while Verisk Analytics's PE ratio is 43.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Kodak is 0.62x versus 14.19x for Verisk Analytics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.