IIIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boeing has a net margin of 3.48% compared to Insteel Industries's net margin of -34.59%. Insteel Industries's return on equity of 5.51% beat Boeing's return on equity of --.

Insteel Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.3%. On the other hand Boeing has an analysts' consensus of $182.84 which suggests that it could grow by 2.9%. Given that Insteel Industries has higher upside potential than Boeing, analysts believe Insteel Industries is more attractive than Boeing.

Insteel Industries has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boeing has a beta of 1.556, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.635%.

Insteel Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.43%. Boeing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Insteel Industries pays 263.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Boeing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Insteel Industries quarterly revenues are $134.3M, which are smaller than Boeing quarterly revenues of $17.8B. Insteel Industries's net income of $4.7M is higher than Boeing's net income of -$6.2B. Notably, Insteel Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.08x while Boeing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Insteel Industries is 1.03x versus 1.49x for Boeing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energizer Holdings has a net margin of 3.48% compared to Insteel Industries's net margin of 5.91%. Insteel Industries's return on equity of 5.51% beat Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 22.9%.

Insteel Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.3%. On the other hand Energizer Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.95%. Given that Insteel Industries has higher upside potential than Energizer Holdings, analysts believe Insteel Industries is more attractive than Energizer Holdings.

Insteel Industries has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energizer Holdings has a beta of 1.057, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.71%.

Insteel Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.43%. Energizer Holdings offers a yield of 3.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Insteel Industries pays 263.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Energizer Holdings pays out 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Insteel Industries quarterly revenues are $134.3M, which are smaller than Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues of $805.7M. Insteel Industries's net income of $4.7M is lower than Energizer Holdings's net income of $47.6M. Notably, Insteel Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.08x while Energizer Holdings's PE ratio is 67.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Insteel Industries is 1.03x versus 0.89x for Energizer Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northwest Pipe has a net margin of 3.48% compared to Insteel Industries's net margin of 7.88%. Insteel Industries's return on equity of 5.51% beat Northwest Pipe's return on equity of 8.53%.

Insteel Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.3%. On the other hand Northwest Pipe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.66%. Given that Insteel Industries has higher upside potential than Northwest Pipe, analysts believe Insteel Industries is more attractive than Northwest Pipe.

Insteel Industries has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northwest Pipe has a beta of 1.019, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.861%.

Insteel Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.43%. Northwest Pipe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Insteel Industries pays 263.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Northwest Pipe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Insteel Industries quarterly revenues are $134.3M, which are larger than Northwest Pipe quarterly revenues of $130.2M. Insteel Industries's net income of $4.7M is lower than Northwest Pipe's net income of $10.3M. Notably, Insteel Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.08x while Northwest Pipe's PE ratio is 16.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Insteel Industries is 1.03x versus 1.03x for Northwest Pipe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snap-on has a net margin of 3.48% compared to Insteel Industries's net margin of 21.89%. Insteel Industries's return on equity of 5.51% beat Snap-on's return on equity of 20.09%.

Insteel Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.3%. On the other hand Snap-on has an analysts' consensus of $288.13 which suggests that it could fall by -3.92%. Given that Insteel Industries has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe Insteel Industries is more attractive than Snap-on.

Insteel Industries has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snap-on has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.629%.

Insteel Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.43%. Snap-on offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share. Insteel Industries pays 263.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Snap-on pays out 35.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Snap-on's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Insteel Industries's is not.

Insteel Industries quarterly revenues are $134.3M, which are smaller than Snap-on quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Insteel Industries's net income of $4.7M is lower than Snap-on's net income of $251.1M. Notably, Insteel Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.08x while Snap-on's PE ratio is 17.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Insteel Industries is 1.03x versus 3.92x for Snap-on. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.