ENR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a net margin of 4.19% compared to Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 0.92%. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 156.54% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s return on equity of -17%.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.29, signalling upside risk potential of 21.86%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energizer Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., analysts believe Energizer Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co..

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.686% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.21%.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.02%. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Energizer Holdings, Inc. pays 36.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. pays out 5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $832.8M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $34.9M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net income of $67.6K. Notably, Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.00x while Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings, Inc. is 0.49x versus 0.53x for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Insteel Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 4.19% compared to Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.2%. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 156.54% beat Insteel Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.71%.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.29, signalling upside risk potential of 21.86%. On the other hand Insteel Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.69%. Given that Energizer Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Insteel Industries, Inc., analysts believe Energizer Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Insteel Industries, Inc..

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.686% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Insteel Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.801, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.9%.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.02%. Insteel Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Energizer Holdings, Inc. pays 36.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Insteel Industries, Inc. pays out 5.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $832.8M, which are larger than Insteel Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $177.4M. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $34.9M is higher than Insteel Industries, Inc.'s net income of $14.6M. Notably, Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.00x while Insteel Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings, Inc. is 0.49x versus 0.97x for Insteel Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power, Inc. has a net margin of 4.19% compared to Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -205.31%. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 156.54% beat Plug Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -105.89%.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.29, signalling upside risk potential of 21.86%. On the other hand Plug Power, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.79 which suggests that it could grow by 36.01%. Given that Plug Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than Energizer Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Plug Power, Inc. is more attractive than Energizer Holdings, Inc..

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.686% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power, Inc. has a beta of 1.741, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.116%.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.02%. Plug Power, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energizer Holdings, Inc. pays 36.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $832.8M, which are larger than Plug Power, Inc. quarterly revenues of $177.1M. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $34.9M is higher than Plug Power, Inc.'s net income of -$363.5M. Notably, Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.00x while Plug Power, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings, Inc. is 0.49x versus 3.14x for Plug Power, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Redwire Corp. has a net margin of 4.19% compared to Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -39.79%. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 156.54% beat Redwire Corp.'s return on equity of -70.24%.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.29, signalling upside risk potential of 21.86%. On the other hand Redwire Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 49.81%. Given that Redwire Corp. has higher upside potential than Energizer Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Redwire Corp. is more attractive than Energizer Holdings, Inc..

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.686% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Redwire Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.02%. Redwire Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energizer Holdings, Inc. pays 36.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Redwire Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $832.8M, which are larger than Redwire Corp. quarterly revenues of $103.4M. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $34.9M is higher than Redwire Corp.'s net income of -$41.2M. Notably, Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.00x while Redwire Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings, Inc. is 0.49x versus 2.52x for Redwire Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.