ENR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Byrna Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -0.44% compared to Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 9.54%. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 138.71% beat Byrna Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.13%.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40.07%. On the other hand Byrna Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 220.8%. Given that Byrna Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Energizer Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Byrna Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Energizer Holdings, Inc..

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.707, which suggesting that the stock is 29.262% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Byrna Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.457, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 145.691%.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.34%. Byrna Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energizer Holdings, Inc. pays 36.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Byrna Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $778.9M, which are larger than Byrna Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $35.2M. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M is lower than Byrna Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $3.4M. Notably, Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.51x while Byrna Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings, Inc. is 0.39x versus 1.84x for Byrna Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Griffon Corp. has a net margin of -0.44% compared to Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 9.92%. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 138.71% beat Griffon Corp.'s return on equity of 32.39%.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40.07%. On the other hand Griffon Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $114.14 which suggests that it could grow by 59.82%. Given that Griffon Corp. has higher upside potential than Energizer Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Griffon Corp. is more attractive than Energizer Holdings, Inc..

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.707, which suggesting that the stock is 29.262% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Griffon Corp. has a beta of 1.365, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.549%.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.34%. Griffon Corp. offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Energizer Holdings, Inc. pays 36.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon Corp. pays out 65.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $778.9M, which are larger than Griffon Corp. quarterly revenues of $649.1M. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M is lower than Griffon Corp.'s net income of $64.4M. Notably, Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.51x while Griffon Corp.'s PE ratio is 76.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings, Inc. is 0.39x versus 1.26x for Griffon Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -0.44% compared to Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 4.57%. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 138.71% beat Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.41%.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40.07%. On the other hand Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $402.45 which suggests that it could grow by 1.43%. Given that Energizer Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., analysts believe Energizer Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc..

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.707, which suggesting that the stock is 29.262% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.359, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.062%.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.34%. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.38 per share. Energizer Holdings, Inc. pays 36.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. pays out 35.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $778.9M, which are smaller than Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M is lower than Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.'s net income of $159M. Notably, Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.51x while Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings, Inc. is 0.39x versus 1.26x for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Insteel Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -0.44% compared to Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 4.75%. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 138.71% beat Insteel Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.51%.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40.07%. On the other hand Insteel Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $42.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.22%. Given that Energizer Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Insteel Industries, Inc., analysts believe Energizer Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Insteel Industries, Inc..

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.707, which suggesting that the stock is 29.262% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Insteel Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.363%.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.34%. Insteel Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Energizer Holdings, Inc. pays 36.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Insteel Industries, Inc. pays out 5.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $778.9M, which are larger than Insteel Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $159.9M. Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M is lower than Insteel Industries, Inc.'s net income of $7.6M. Notably, Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.51x while Insteel Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings, Inc. is 0.39x versus 0.96x for Insteel Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.