ENR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 5.91% compared to Energizer Holdings's net margin of 3.86%. Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 22.9% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

Energizer Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.08%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.9%. Given that Energizer Holdings has higher upside potential than CPI Aerostructures, analysts believe Energizer Holdings is more attractive than CPI Aerostructures.

Energizer Holdings has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.71% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.743, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.291%.

Energizer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.37%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energizer Holdings pays 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues are $805.7M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Energizer Holdings's net income of $47.6M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Energizer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 68.44x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 2.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings is 0.90x versus 0.58x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 5.91% compared to Energizer Holdings's net margin of -82.25%. Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 22.9% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

Energizer Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.08%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9905767.09%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Energizer Holdings, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Energizer Holdings.

Energizer Holdings has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.71% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 247.194%.

Energizer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.37%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energizer Holdings pays 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -0.6% of its earnings as a dividend.

Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues are $805.7M, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. Energizer Holdings's net income of $47.6M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, Energizer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 68.44x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings is 0.90x versus 0.03x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Insteel Industries has a net margin of 5.91% compared to Energizer Holdings's net margin of 3.48%. Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 22.9% beat Insteel Industries's return on equity of 5.51%.

Energizer Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.08%. On the other hand Insteel Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.6%. Given that Insteel Industries has higher upside potential than Energizer Holdings, analysts believe Insteel Industries is more attractive than Energizer Holdings.

Energizer Holdings has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.71% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Insteel Industries has a beta of 1.114, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.441%.

Energizer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.37%. Insteel Industries offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Energizer Holdings pays 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Insteel Industries pays out 263.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues are $805.7M, which are larger than Insteel Industries quarterly revenues of $134.3M. Energizer Holdings's net income of $47.6M is higher than Insteel Industries's net income of $4.7M. Notably, Energizer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 68.44x while Insteel Industries's PE ratio is 28.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings is 0.90x versus 1.03x for Insteel Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northwest Pipe has a net margin of 5.91% compared to Energizer Holdings's net margin of 7.88%. Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 22.9% beat Northwest Pipe's return on equity of 8.53%.

Energizer Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.08%. On the other hand Northwest Pipe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.99%. Given that Northwest Pipe has higher upside potential than Energizer Holdings, analysts believe Northwest Pipe is more attractive than Energizer Holdings.

Energizer Holdings has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.71% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northwest Pipe has a beta of 1.019, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.861%.

Energizer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.37%. Northwest Pipe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energizer Holdings pays 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Northwest Pipe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues are $805.7M, which are larger than Northwest Pipe quarterly revenues of $130.2M. Energizer Holdings's net income of $47.6M is higher than Northwest Pipe's net income of $10.3M. Notably, Energizer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 68.44x while Northwest Pipe's PE ratio is 17.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings is 0.90x versus 1.04x for Northwest Pipe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.