HCC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has a net margin of 11.16% compared to Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s net margin of -3850350%. Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.68% beat American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s return on equity of -522.62%.

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. has a consensus price target of $89.17, signalling upside risk potential of 0.01%. On the other hand American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has an analysts' consensus of $6.75 which suggests that it could grow by 156.65%. Given that American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has higher upside potential than Warrior Met Coal, Inc., analysts believe American Resources Corp. (Indiana) is more attractive than Warrior Met Coal, Inc..

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. has a beta of 0.686, which suggesting that the stock is 31.363% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.543%.

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.36%. American Resources Corp. (Indiana) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Warrior Met Coal, Inc. pays 6.68% of its earnings as a dividend. American Resources Corp. (Indiana) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. quarterly revenues are $327.9M, which are larger than American Resources Corp. (Indiana) quarterly revenues of $200. Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s net income of $36.6M is higher than American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s net income of -$7.7M. Notably, Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 133.53x while American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. is 3.83x versus 2,317.47x for American Resources Corp. (Indiana). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ramaco Resources, Inc. has a net margin of 11.16% compared to Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s net margin of -11%. Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.68% beat Ramaco Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.41%.

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. has a consensus price target of $89.17, signalling upside risk potential of 0.01%. On the other hand Ramaco Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $36.44 which suggests that it could grow by 100.43%. Given that Ramaco Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Warrior Met Coal, Inc., analysts believe Ramaco Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Warrior Met Coal, Inc..

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. has a beta of 0.686, which suggesting that the stock is 31.363% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ramaco Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.381%.

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.36%. Ramaco Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Warrior Met Coal, Inc. pays 6.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Ramaco Resources, Inc. pays out 197.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ramaco Resources, Inc.'s is not.

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. quarterly revenues are $327.9M, which are larger than Ramaco Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of $121M. Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s net income of $36.6M is higher than Ramaco Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 133.53x while Ramaco Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 60.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. is 3.83x versus 1.74x for Ramaco Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Royal Gold, Inc. has a net margin of 11.16% compared to Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s net margin of 52.29%. Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.68% beat Royal Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.04%.

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. has a consensus price target of $89.17, signalling upside risk potential of 0.01%. On the other hand Royal Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $253.91 which suggests that it could grow by 8.92%. Given that Royal Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Warrior Met Coal, Inc., analysts believe Royal Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Warrior Met Coal, Inc..

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. has a beta of 0.686, which suggesting that the stock is 31.363% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.94%.

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.36%. Royal Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Warrior Met Coal, Inc. pays 6.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Gold, Inc. pays out 31.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. quarterly revenues are $327.9M, which are larger than Royal Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of $252.1M. Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s net income of $36.6M is lower than Royal Gold, Inc.'s net income of $131.8M. Notably, Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 133.53x while Royal Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. is 3.83x versus 17.89x for Royal Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SunCoke Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 11.16% compared to Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s net margin of 4.89%. Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.68% beat SunCoke Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.21%.

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. has a consensus price target of $89.17, signalling upside risk potential of 0.01%. On the other hand SunCoke Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 40.06%. Given that SunCoke Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Warrior Met Coal, Inc., analysts believe SunCoke Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Warrior Met Coal, Inc..

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. has a beta of 0.686, which suggesting that the stock is 31.363% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SunCoke Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.671%.

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.36%. SunCoke Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 6.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Warrior Met Coal, Inc. pays 6.68% of its earnings as a dividend. SunCoke Energy, Inc. pays out 39.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. quarterly revenues are $327.9M, which are smaller than SunCoke Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $487M. Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s net income of $36.6M is higher than SunCoke Energy, Inc.'s net income of $23.8M. Notably, Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 133.53x while SunCoke Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. is 3.83x versus 0.33x for SunCoke Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.