AREC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. has a net margin of -3850350% compared to American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s net margin of 5.98%. American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s return on equity of -522.62% beat Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.71%.

American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has a consensus price target of $6.75, signalling upside risk potential of 105.79%. On the other hand Warrior Met Coal, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $102.17 which suggests that it could grow by 29.42%. Given that American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has higher upside potential than Warrior Met Coal, Inc., analysts believe American Resources Corp. (Indiana) is more attractive than Warrior Met Coal, Inc..

American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Warrior Met Coal, Inc. has a beta of 0.691, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.881%.

American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Warrior Met Coal, Inc. offers a yield of 0.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. American Resources Corp. (Indiana) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Warrior Met Coal, Inc. pays out 29.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Resources Corp. (Indiana) quarterly revenues are $200, which are smaller than Warrior Met Coal, Inc. quarterly revenues of $384.1M. American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s net income of -$7.7M is lower than Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s net income of $23M. Notably, American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Warrior Met Coal, Inc.'s PE ratio is 72.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Resources Corp. (Indiana) is 2,797.54x versus 3.17x for Warrior Met Coal, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MP Materials Corp. has a net margin of -3850350% compared to American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s net margin of 9.09%. American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s return on equity of -522.62% beat MP Materials Corp.'s return on equity of -5.45%.

American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has a consensus price target of $6.75, signalling upside risk potential of 105.79%. On the other hand MP Materials Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $78.50 which suggests that it could grow by 30.18%. Given that American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has higher upside potential than MP Materials Corp., analysts believe American Resources Corp. (Indiana) is more attractive than MP Materials Corp..

American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MP Materials Corp. has a beta of 1.550, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.048%.

American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MP Materials Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Resources Corp. (Indiana) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MP Materials Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Resources Corp. (Indiana) quarterly revenues are $200, which are smaller than MP Materials Corp. quarterly revenues of $103.7M. American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s net income of -$7.7M is lower than MP Materials Corp.'s net income of $9.4M. Notably, American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MP Materials Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Resources Corp. (Indiana) is 2,797.54x versus 38.41x for MP Materials Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NioCorp Developments Ltd. has a net margin of -3850350% compared to American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s net margin of --. American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s return on equity of -522.62% beat NioCorp Developments Ltd.'s return on equity of -56.06%.

American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has a consensus price target of $6.75, signalling upside risk potential of 105.79%. On the other hand NioCorp Developments Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $12.4875 which suggests that it could grow by 162.9%. Given that NioCorp Developments Ltd. has higher upside potential than American Resources Corp. (Indiana), analysts believe NioCorp Developments Ltd. is more attractive than American Resources Corp. (Indiana).

American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NioCorp Developments Ltd. has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.137%.

American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NioCorp Developments Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Resources Corp. (Indiana) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NioCorp Developments Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Resources Corp. (Indiana) quarterly revenues are $200, which are larger than NioCorp Developments Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s net income of -$7.7M is lower than NioCorp Developments Ltd.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NioCorp Developments Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Resources Corp. (Indiana) is 2,797.54x versus 5,553.42x for NioCorp Developments Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

USA Rare Earth, Inc. has a net margin of -3850350% compared to American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s net margin of --. American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s return on equity of -522.62% beat USA Rare Earth, Inc.'s return on equity of -3578.6%.

American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has a consensus price target of $6.75, signalling upside risk potential of 105.79%. On the other hand USA Rare Earth, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 103.1%. Given that American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has higher upside potential than USA Rare Earth, Inc., analysts believe American Resources Corp. (Indiana) is more attractive than USA Rare Earth, Inc..

American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison USA Rare Earth, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

American Resources Corp. (Indiana) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. USA Rare Earth, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Resources Corp. (Indiana) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. USA Rare Earth, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Resources Corp. (Indiana) quarterly revenues are $200, which are larger than USA Rare Earth, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s net income of -$7.7M is higher than USA Rare Earth, Inc.'s net income of -$157M. Notably, American Resources Corp. (Indiana)'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while USA Rare Earth, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Resources Corp. (Indiana) is 2,797.54x versus -- for USA Rare Earth, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.