MP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ramaco Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -78.02% compared to MP Materials Corp.'s net margin of -11%. MP Materials Corp.'s return on equity of -8.99% beat Ramaco Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.41%.

MP Materials Corp. has a consensus price target of $79.11, signalling upside risk potential of 28.01%. On the other hand Ramaco Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.14 which suggests that it could grow by 115.07%. Given that Ramaco Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than MP Materials Corp., analysts believe Ramaco Resources, Inc. is more attractive than MP Materials Corp..

MP Materials Corp. has a beta of 1.695, which suggesting that the stock is 69.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ramaco Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.381%.

MP Materials Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ramaco Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. MP Materials Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ramaco Resources, Inc. pays out 197.75% of its earnings as a dividend.

MP Materials Corp. quarterly revenues are $53.6M, which are smaller than Ramaco Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of $121M. MP Materials Corp.'s net income of -$41.8M is lower than Ramaco Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$13.3M. Notably, MP Materials Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ramaco Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 60.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MP Materials Corp. is 44.21x versus 1.74x for Ramaco Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NioCorp Developments Ltd. has a net margin of -78.02% compared to MP Materials Corp.'s net margin of --. MP Materials Corp.'s return on equity of -8.99% beat NioCorp Developments Ltd.'s return on equity of -139.19%.

MP Materials Corp. has a consensus price target of $79.11, signalling upside risk potential of 28.01%. On the other hand NioCorp Developments Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $12.75 which suggests that it could grow by 84.25%. Given that NioCorp Developments Ltd. has higher upside potential than MP Materials Corp., analysts believe NioCorp Developments Ltd. is more attractive than MP Materials Corp..

MP Materials Corp. has a beta of 1.695, which suggesting that the stock is 69.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NioCorp Developments Ltd. has a beta of 1.268, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.838%.

MP Materials Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NioCorp Developments Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MP Materials Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NioCorp Developments Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MP Materials Corp. quarterly revenues are $53.6M, which are larger than NioCorp Developments Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. MP Materials Corp.'s net income of -$41.8M is lower than NioCorp Developments Ltd.'s net income of -$40.8M. Notably, MP Materials Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NioCorp Developments Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MP Materials Corp. is 44.21x versus 5,553.42x for NioCorp Developments Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Antimony Corp. has a net margin of -78.02% compared to MP Materials Corp.'s net margin of -54.94%. MP Materials Corp.'s return on equity of -8.99% beat United States Antimony Corp.'s return on equity of -13.12%.

MP Materials Corp. has a consensus price target of $79.11, signalling upside risk potential of 28.01%. On the other hand United States Antimony Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $9.67 which suggests that it could grow by 57.95%. Given that United States Antimony Corp. has higher upside potential than MP Materials Corp., analysts believe United States Antimony Corp. is more attractive than MP Materials Corp..

MP Materials Corp. has a beta of 1.695, which suggesting that the stock is 69.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Antimony Corp. has a beta of 0.008, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.25%.

MP Materials Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United States Antimony Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MP Materials Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Antimony Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MP Materials Corp. quarterly revenues are $53.6M, which are larger than United States Antimony Corp. quarterly revenues of $8.7M. MP Materials Corp.'s net income of -$41.8M is lower than United States Antimony Corp.'s net income of -$4.8M. Notably, MP Materials Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while United States Antimony Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MP Materials Corp. is 44.21x versus 22.27x for United States Antimony Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

USA Rare Earth, Inc. has a net margin of -78.02% compared to MP Materials Corp.'s net margin of --. MP Materials Corp.'s return on equity of -8.99% beat USA Rare Earth, Inc.'s return on equity of -3578.6%.

MP Materials Corp. has a consensus price target of $79.11, signalling upside risk potential of 28.01%. On the other hand USA Rare Earth, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.20 which suggests that it could grow by 55.61%. Given that USA Rare Earth, Inc. has higher upside potential than MP Materials Corp., analysts believe USA Rare Earth, Inc. is more attractive than MP Materials Corp..

MP Materials Corp. has a beta of 1.695, which suggesting that the stock is 69.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison USA Rare Earth, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MP Materials Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. USA Rare Earth, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MP Materials Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. USA Rare Earth, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MP Materials Corp. quarterly revenues are $53.6M, which are larger than USA Rare Earth, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. MP Materials Corp.'s net income of -$41.8M is higher than USA Rare Earth, Inc.'s net income of -$157M. Notably, MP Materials Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while USA Rare Earth, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MP Materials Corp. is 44.21x versus -- for USA Rare Earth, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.