GLP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Central Energy Partners LP has a net margin of 0.62% compared to Global Partners LP's net margin of --. Global Partners LP's return on equity of 13.81% beat Central Energy Partners LP's return on equity of --.

Global Partners LP has a consensus price target of $49.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.08%. On the other hand Central Energy Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Partners LP has higher upside potential than Central Energy Partners LP, analysts believe Global Partners LP is more attractive than Central Energy Partners LP.

Global Partners LP has a beta of 0.942, which suggesting that the stock is 5.764% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Central Energy Partners LP has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Global Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.02%. Central Energy Partners LP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Partners LP pays 118.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Central Energy Partners LP pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Partners LP quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Central Energy Partners LP quarterly revenues of --. Global Partners LP's net income of $29M is higher than Central Energy Partners LP's net income of --. Notably, Global Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.36x while Central Energy Partners LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Partners LP is 0.08x versus -- for Central Energy Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 0.62% compared to Global Partners LP's net margin of 27.5%. Global Partners LP's return on equity of 13.81% beat Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.98%.

Global Partners LP has a consensus price target of $49.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.08%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $179.73 which suggests that it could grow by 22.84%. Given that Diamondback Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Global Partners LP, analysts believe Diamondback Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Global Partners LP.

Global Partners LP has a beta of 0.942, which suggesting that the stock is 5.764% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.337%.

Global Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.02%. Diamondback Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Global Partners LP pays 118.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy, Inc. pays out 53.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Partners LP's is not.

Global Partners LP quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Diamondback Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Global Partners LP's net income of $29M is lower than Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Global Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.36x while Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Partners LP is 0.08x versus 2.77x for Diamondback Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunoco LP has a net margin of 0.62% compared to Global Partners LP's net margin of 1.46%. Global Partners LP's return on equity of 13.81% beat Sunoco LP's return on equity of 9.12%.

Global Partners LP has a consensus price target of $49.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.08%. On the other hand Sunoco LP has an analysts' consensus of $64.22 which suggests that it could grow by 21.11%. Given that Sunoco LP has higher upside potential than Global Partners LP, analysts believe Sunoco LP is more attractive than Global Partners LP.

Global Partners LP has a beta of 0.942, which suggesting that the stock is 5.764% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunoco LP has a beta of 0.487, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.312%.

Global Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.02%. Sunoco LP offers a yield of 6.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. Global Partners LP pays 118.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Sunoco LP pays out 57.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Sunoco LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Partners LP's is not.

Global Partners LP quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Sunoco LP quarterly revenues of $6B. Global Partners LP's net income of $29M is lower than Sunoco LP's net income of $88M. Notably, Global Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.36x while Sunoco LP's PE ratio is 18.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Partners LP is 0.08x versus 0.33x for Sunoco LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

World Kinect Corp. has a net margin of 0.62% compared to Global Partners LP's net margin of 0.3%. Global Partners LP's return on equity of 13.81% beat World Kinect Corp.'s return on equity of -23.65%.

Global Partners LP has a consensus price target of $49.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.08%. On the other hand World Kinect Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $28.67 which suggests that it could grow by 21.73%. Given that World Kinect Corp. has higher upside potential than Global Partners LP, analysts believe World Kinect Corp. is more attractive than Global Partners LP.

Global Partners LP has a beta of 0.942, which suggesting that the stock is 5.764% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison World Kinect Corp. has a beta of 1.148, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.75%.

Global Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.02%. World Kinect Corp. offers a yield of 3.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Global Partners LP pays 118.65% of its earnings as a dividend. World Kinect Corp. pays out 60.03% of its earnings as a dividend. World Kinect Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Partners LP's is not.

Global Partners LP quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than World Kinect Corp. quarterly revenues of $9.4B. Global Partners LP's net income of $29M is higher than World Kinect Corp.'s net income of $28.1M. Notably, Global Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.36x while World Kinect Corp.'s PE ratio is 115.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Partners LP is 0.08x versus 0.04x for World Kinect Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.