FANG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Matador Resources has a net margin of 29.06% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 21.93%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58% beat Matador Resources's return on equity of 18.31%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $204.31, signalling upside risk potential of 27.79%. On the other hand Matador Resources has an analysts' consensus of $73.06 which suggests that it could grow by 43%. Given that Matador Resources has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Matador Resources is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matador Resources has a beta of 2.741, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 174.1%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.22%. Matador Resources offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 11.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Matador Resources quarterly revenues of $978.3M. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B is higher than Matador Resources's net income of $214.5M. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.12x while Matador Resources's PE ratio is 7.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 3.10x versus 1.82x for Matador Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 29.06% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of -1.88%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.38%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $204.31, signalling upside risk potential of 27.79%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $58.78 which suggests that it could grow by 19.09%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.519%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.22%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of -$127M. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.12x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 20.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 3.10x versus 1.79x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viper Energy has a net margin of 29.06% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 91.93%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58% beat Viper Energy's return on equity of 11.34%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $204.31, signalling upside risk potential of 27.79%. On the other hand Viper Energy has an analysts' consensus of $59.21 which suggests that it could grow by 34%. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viper Energy has a beta of 1.691, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.094%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.22%. Viper Energy offers a yield of 4.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Viper Energy pays out 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Viper Energy's is not.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Viper Energy quarterly revenues of $228.5M. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B is higher than Viper Energy's net income of $210.1M. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.12x while Viper Energy's PE ratio is 12.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 3.10x versus 4.83x for Viper Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 29.06% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 9.39%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $204.31, signalling upside risk potential of 27.79%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $128.98 which suggests that it could grow by 9.66%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.826, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.351%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.22%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.12x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 15.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 3.10x versus 1.49x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.