GIL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Acushnet Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s net margin of -7.33%. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.1% beat Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18%.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.11, signalling upside risk potential of 52.64%. On the other hand Acushnet Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $99.67 which suggests that it could grow by 6.16%. Given that Gildan Activewear, Inc. has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings Corp., analysts believe Gildan Activewear, Inc. is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings Corp..

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 12.969% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acushnet Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.926, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.432%.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Acushnet Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Gildan Activewear, Inc. pays 34.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings Corp. pays out 30.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Acushnet Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $477.2M. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s net income of $51.2M is higher than Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$35M. Notably, Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.16x while Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 30.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gildan Activewear, Inc. is 2.24x versus 2.23x for Acushnet Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Summit Networks, Inc. has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s net margin of -866.67%. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.1% beat Summit Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of -40.17%.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.11, signalling upside risk potential of 52.64%. On the other hand Summit Networks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gildan Activewear, Inc. has higher upside potential than Summit Networks, Inc., analysts believe Gildan Activewear, Inc. is more attractive than Summit Networks, Inc..

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 12.969% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Summit Networks, Inc. has a beta of 11.203, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1020.336%.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Summit Networks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gildan Activewear, Inc. pays 34.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Summit Networks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Summit Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.3K. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s net income of $51.2M is higher than Summit Networks, Inc.'s net income of -$80.6K. Notably, Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.16x while Summit Networks, Inc.'s PE ratio is 301.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gildan Activewear, Inc. is 2.24x versus 829.04x for Summit Networks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s net margin of 3.44%. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.1% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.11, signalling upside risk potential of 52.64%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $417.08 which suggests that it could grow by 16.15%. Given that Gildan Activewear, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Gildan Activewear, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 12.969% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.913, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.3%.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gildan Activewear, Inc. pays 34.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9B. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s net income of $51.2M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M. Notably, Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.16x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 316.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gildan Activewear, Inc. is 2.24x versus 12.67x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s net margin of -27.48%. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.1% beat Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -141.95%.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.11, signalling upside risk potential of 52.64%. On the other hand Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.01 which suggests that it could grow by 23314.99%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gildan Activewear, Inc., analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Gildan Activewear, Inc..

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 12.969% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.422, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.825%.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gildan Activewear, Inc. pays 34.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $15.7M. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s net income of $51.2M is higher than Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.16x while Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gildan Activewear, Inc. is 2.24x versus 0.08x for Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.