GIL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a net margin of 13.24% compared to Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s net margin of 14.69%. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.37% beat lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 42.48%.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a consensus price target of $74.22, signalling upside risk potential of 26.25%. On the other hand lululemon athletica, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $190.19 which suggests that it could grow by 0.09%. Given that Gildan Activewear, Inc. has higher upside potential than lululemon athletica, Inc., analysts believe Gildan Activewear, Inc. is more attractive than lululemon athletica, Inc..

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.008% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.107%.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. lululemon athletica, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gildan Activewear, Inc. pays 33.28% of its earnings as a dividend. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. quarterly revenues are $907.8M, which are smaller than lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s net income of $120.2M is lower than lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $370.9M. Notably, Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.76x while lululemon athletica, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gildan Activewear, Inc. is 2.65x versus 2.12x for lululemon athletica, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mobileye Global, Inc. has a net margin of 13.24% compared to Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s net margin of -19.05%. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.37% beat Mobileye Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.79%.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a consensus price target of $74.22, signalling upside risk potential of 26.25%. On the other hand Mobileye Global, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.07 which suggests that it could grow by 63.02%. Given that Mobileye Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gildan Activewear, Inc., analysts believe Mobileye Global, Inc. is more attractive than Gildan Activewear, Inc..

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.008% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mobileye Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Mobileye Global, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gildan Activewear, Inc. pays 33.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Mobileye Global, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. quarterly revenues are $907.8M, which are larger than Mobileye Global, Inc. quarterly revenues of $504M. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s net income of $120.2M is higher than Mobileye Global, Inc.'s net income of -$96M. Notably, Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.76x while Mobileye Global, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gildan Activewear, Inc. is 2.65x versus 4.90x for Mobileye Global, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Summit Networks, Inc. has a net margin of 13.24% compared to Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s net margin of -866.67%. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.37% beat Summit Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of -40.17%.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a consensus price target of $74.22, signalling upside risk potential of 26.25%. On the other hand Summit Networks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gildan Activewear, Inc. has higher upside potential than Summit Networks, Inc., analysts believe Gildan Activewear, Inc. is more attractive than Summit Networks, Inc..

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.008% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Summit Networks, Inc. has a beta of 10.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 920.639%.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Summit Networks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gildan Activewear, Inc. pays 33.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Summit Networks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. quarterly revenues are $907.8M, which are larger than Summit Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.3K. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s net income of $120.2M is higher than Summit Networks, Inc.'s net income of -$80.6K. Notably, Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.76x while Summit Networks, Inc.'s PE ratio is 301.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gildan Activewear, Inc. is 2.65x versus 933.81x for Summit Networks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 13.24% compared to Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s net margin of -2502.32%. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.37% beat Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -141.95%.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a consensus price target of $74.22, signalling upside risk potential of 26.25%. On the other hand Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.01 which suggests that it could grow by 1255.09%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gildan Activewear, Inc., analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Gildan Activewear, Inc..

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.008% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.226, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.366%.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gildan Activewear, Inc. pays 33.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gildan Activewear, Inc. quarterly revenues are $907.8M, which are larger than Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $203K. Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s net income of $120.2M is higher than Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Gildan Activewear, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.76x while Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gildan Activewear, Inc. is 2.65x versus 0.07x for Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.