GIB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CSG Systems International, Inc. has a net margin of 9.5% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of 6.75%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.57% beat CSG Systems International, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.06%.

CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $92.50, signalling downside risk potential of -1.41%. On the other hand CSG Systems International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $79.82 which suggests that it could grow by 4.87%. Given that CSG Systems International, Inc. has higher upside potential than CGI, Inc., analysts believe CSG Systems International, Inc. is more attractive than CGI, Inc..

CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.609, which suggesting that the stock is 39.076% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CSG Systems International, Inc. has a beta of 0.884, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.567%.

CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. CSG Systems International, Inc. offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. CSG Systems International, Inc. pays out 39.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than CSG Systems International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $303.6M. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $276.9M is higher than CSG Systems International, Inc.'s net income of $20.5M. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.85x while CSG Systems International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.86x versus 1.78x for CSG Systems International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Castellum, Inc. has a net margin of 9.5% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of 2.84%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.57% beat Castellum, Inc.'s return on equity of -15.06%.

CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $92.50, signalling downside risk potential of -1.41%. On the other hand Castellum, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 185.71%. Given that Castellum, Inc. has higher upside potential than CGI, Inc., analysts believe Castellum, Inc. is more attractive than CGI, Inc..

CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.609, which suggesting that the stock is 39.076% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum, Inc. has a beta of -4.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 592.067%.

CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Castellum, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum, Inc. pays out 1.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Castellum, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.6M. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $276.9M is higher than Castellum, Inc.'s net income of $415.4K. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.85x while Castellum, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.86x versus 1.63x for Castellum, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 9.5% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of -3.19%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.57% beat Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.63%.

CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $92.50, signalling downside risk potential of -1.41%. On the other hand Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGI, Inc. has higher upside potential than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc., analysts believe CGI, Inc. is more attractive than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc..

CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.609, which suggesting that the stock is 39.076% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. has a beta of -0.697, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.667%.

CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGI, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $482.7K. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $276.9M is higher than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.'s net income of -$15.4K. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.85x while Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 261.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.86x versus 7.35x for Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZenaTech, Inc. has a net margin of 9.5% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of -282.41%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.57% beat ZenaTech, Inc.'s return on equity of -106.3%.

CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $92.50, signalling downside risk potential of -1.41%. On the other hand ZenaTech, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.99 which suggests that it could grow by 86.2%. Given that ZenaTech, Inc. has higher upside potential than CGI, Inc., analysts believe ZenaTech, Inc. is more attractive than CGI, Inc..

CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.609, which suggesting that the stock is 39.076% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZenaTech, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. ZenaTech, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. ZenaTech, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGI, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than ZenaTech, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2M. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $276.9M is higher than ZenaTech, Inc.'s net income of -$8.9M. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.85x while ZenaTech, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.86x versus 18.92x for ZenaTech, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.