GIB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc. has a net margin of 10.84% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of -178.89%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.48% beat China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.83%.

CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $90.77, signalling upside risk potential of 23.9%. On the other hand China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGI, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc., analysts believe CGI, Inc. is more attractive than China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc..

CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.629, which suggesting that the stock is 37.115% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc. has a beta of -1.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 212.05%.

CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGI, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc. quarterly revenues of $18K. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $317M is higher than China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc.'s net income of -$32.2K. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.41x versus 52.81x for China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fact, Inc. has a net margin of 10.84% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of --. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.48% beat Fact, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $90.77, signalling upside risk potential of 23.9%. On the other hand Fact, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGI, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fact, Inc., analysts believe CGI, Inc. is more attractive than Fact, Inc..

CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.629, which suggesting that the stock is 37.115% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fact, Inc. has a beta of 7.865, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 686.54%.

CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Fact, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Fact, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGI, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Fact, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $317M is higher than Fact, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while Fact, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.41x versus -- for Fact, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 10.84% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of 7.58%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.48% beat Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.6%.

CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $90.77, signalling upside risk potential of 23.9%. On the other hand Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGI, Inc. has higher upside potential than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc., analysts believe CGI, Inc. is more attractive than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc..

CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.629, which suggesting that the stock is 37.115% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. has a beta of -0.433, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 143.296%.

CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGI, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $653.5K. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $317M is higher than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.'s net income of $49.5K. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 229.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.41x versus 5.20x for Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZenaTech, Inc. has a net margin of 10.84% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of -282.41%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.48% beat ZenaTech, Inc.'s return on equity of -106.3%.

CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $90.77, signalling upside risk potential of 23.9%. On the other hand ZenaTech, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.99 which suggests that it could grow by 162.21%. Given that ZenaTech, Inc. has higher upside potential than CGI, Inc., analysts believe ZenaTech, Inc. is more attractive than CGI, Inc..

CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.629, which suggesting that the stock is 37.115% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZenaTech, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. ZenaTech, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. ZenaTech, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGI, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than ZenaTech, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2M. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $317M is higher than ZenaTech, Inc.'s net income of -$8.9M. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while ZenaTech, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.41x versus 13.44x for ZenaTech, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.