GIB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions has a net margin of 11.91% compared to CGI's net margin of -155.02%. CGI's return on equity of 19.06% beat A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions's return on equity of -42198.63%.

CGI has a consensus price target of $97.37, signalling downside risk potential of -0.36%. On the other hand A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 542.86%. Given that A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions has higher upside potential than CGI, analysts believe A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions is more attractive than CGI.

CGI has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.438% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CGI has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CGI quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions quarterly revenues of $2.1M. CGI's net income of $319.4M is higher than A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, CGI's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.29x while A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI is 2.34x versus 19.50x for A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Femto Technologies has a net margin of 11.91% compared to CGI's net margin of -5332.11%. CGI's return on equity of 19.06% beat Femto Technologies's return on equity of -255.31%.

CGI has a consensus price target of $97.37, signalling downside risk potential of -0.36%. On the other hand Femto Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGI has higher upside potential than Femto Technologies, analysts believe CGI is more attractive than Femto Technologies.

CGI has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.438% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Femto Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CGI has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Femto Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Femto Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CGI quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Femto Technologies quarterly revenues of $74.5K. CGI's net income of $319.4M is higher than Femto Technologies's net income of -$4M. Notably, CGI's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.29x while Femto Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI is 2.34x versus 3.04x for Femto Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Earth Life Sciences has a net margin of 11.91% compared to CGI's net margin of --. CGI's return on equity of 19.06% beat Earth Life Sciences's return on equity of --.

CGI has a consensus price target of $97.37, signalling downside risk potential of -0.36%. On the other hand Earth Life Sciences has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGI has higher upside potential than Earth Life Sciences, analysts believe CGI is more attractive than Earth Life Sciences.

CGI has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.438% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Earth Life Sciences has a beta of -0.533, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 153.264%.

CGI has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Earth Life Sciences offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Earth Life Sciences pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CGI quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Earth Life Sciences quarterly revenues of --. CGI's net income of $319.4M is higher than Earth Life Sciences's net income of --. Notably, CGI's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.29x while Earth Life Sciences's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI is 2.34x versus -- for Earth Life Sciences. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Two Hands has a net margin of 11.91% compared to CGI's net margin of -185.58%. CGI's return on equity of 19.06% beat Two Hands's return on equity of --.

CGI has a consensus price target of $97.37, signalling downside risk potential of -0.36%. On the other hand Two Hands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGI has higher upside potential than Two Hands, analysts believe CGI is more attractive than Two Hands.

CGI has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.438% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Two Hands has a beta of -3.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 492.107%.

CGI has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Two Hands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Two Hands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CGI quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Two Hands quarterly revenues of $179.5K. CGI's net income of $319.4M is higher than Two Hands's net income of -$333.1K. Notably, CGI's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.29x while Two Hands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI is 2.34x versus 0.88x for Two Hands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.