GIB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CSG Systems International, Inc. has a net margin of 10.84% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of 6.75%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.48% beat CSG Systems International, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.06%.

CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $96.84, signalling upside risk potential of 16.64%. On the other hand CSG Systems International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $79.82 which suggests that it could grow by 1.57%. Given that CGI, Inc. has higher upside potential than CSG Systems International, Inc., analysts believe CGI, Inc. is more attractive than CSG Systems International, Inc..

CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.594, which suggesting that the stock is 40.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CSG Systems International, Inc. has a beta of 0.878, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.195%.

CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. CSG Systems International, Inc. offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. CSG Systems International, Inc. pays out 39.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than CSG Systems International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $303.6M. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $317M is higher than CSG Systems International, Inc.'s net income of $20.5M. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.48x while CSG Systems International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.59x versus 1.84x for CSG Systems International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fact, Inc. has a net margin of 10.84% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of --. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.48% beat Fact, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $96.84, signalling upside risk potential of 16.64%. On the other hand Fact, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGI, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fact, Inc., analysts believe CGI, Inc. is more attractive than Fact, Inc..

CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.594, which suggesting that the stock is 40.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fact, Inc. has a beta of 7.764, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 676.356%.

CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Fact, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Fact, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGI, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Fact, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $317M is higher than Fact, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.48x while Fact, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.59x versus -- for Fact, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 10.84% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of 7.58%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.48% beat Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.6%.

CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $96.84, signalling upside risk potential of 16.64%. On the other hand Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGI, Inc. has higher upside potential than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc., analysts believe CGI, Inc. is more attractive than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc..

CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.594, which suggesting that the stock is 40.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. has a beta of -0.452, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 145.247%.

CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGI, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $653.5K. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $317M is higher than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.'s net income of $49.5K. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.48x while Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 229.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.59x versus 6.49x for Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZenaTech, Inc. has a net margin of 10.84% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of -282.41%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.48% beat ZenaTech, Inc.'s return on equity of -106.3%.

CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $96.84, signalling upside risk potential of 16.64%. On the other hand ZenaTech, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.99 which suggests that it could grow by 134.15%. Given that ZenaTech, Inc. has higher upside potential than CGI, Inc., analysts believe ZenaTech, Inc. is more attractive than CGI, Inc..

CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.594, which suggesting that the stock is 40.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZenaTech, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. ZenaTech, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. ZenaTech, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGI, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than ZenaTech, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2M. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $317M is higher than ZenaTech, Inc.'s net income of -$8.9M. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.48x while ZenaTech, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.59x versus 15.05x for ZenaTech, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.