FUN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Parks! America has a net margin of -131.35% compared to Six Flags Entertainment's net margin of 7.95%. Six Flags Entertainment's return on equity of -- beat Parks! America's return on equity of -7.7%.

Six Flags Entertainment has a consensus price target of $56.38, signalling upside risk potential of 17.76%. On the other hand Parks! America has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Six Flags Entertainment has higher upside potential than Parks! America, analysts believe Six Flags Entertainment is more attractive than Parks! America.

Six Flags Entertainment has a beta of 1.575, which suggesting that the stock is 57.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parks! America has a beta of 0.580, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.958%.

Six Flags Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Parks! America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Six Flags Entertainment pays 49.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Parks! America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Six Flags Entertainment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Six Flags Entertainment quarterly revenues are $101.6M, which are larger than Parks! America quarterly revenues of $2.6M. Six Flags Entertainment's net income of -$133.5M is lower than Parks! America's net income of $207.2K. Notably, Six Flags Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.05x while Parks! America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Six Flags Entertainment is 1.35x versus 3.05x for Parks! America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Parks & Resorts has a net margin of -131.35% compared to Six Flags Entertainment's net margin of 21.92%. Six Flags Entertainment's return on equity of -- beat United Parks & Resorts's return on equity of --.

Six Flags Entertainment has a consensus price target of $56.38, signalling upside risk potential of 17.76%. On the other hand United Parks & Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $61.82 which suggests that it could grow by 6.13%. Given that Six Flags Entertainment has higher upside potential than United Parks & Resorts, analysts believe Six Flags Entertainment is more attractive than United Parks & Resorts.

Six Flags Entertainment has a beta of 1.575, which suggesting that the stock is 57.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Parks & Resorts has a beta of 1.993, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.287%.

Six Flags Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. United Parks & Resorts offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Six Flags Entertainment pays 49.06% of its earnings as a dividend. United Parks & Resorts pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Six Flags Entertainment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Six Flags Entertainment quarterly revenues are $101.6M, which are smaller than United Parks & Resorts quarterly revenues of $545.9M. Six Flags Entertainment's net income of -$133.5M is lower than United Parks & Resorts's net income of $119.7M. Notably, Six Flags Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.05x while United Parks & Resorts's PE ratio is 14.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Six Flags Entertainment is 1.35x versus 2.09x for United Parks & Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

High Roller Technologies has a net margin of -131.35% compared to Six Flags Entertainment's net margin of -6.67%. Six Flags Entertainment's return on equity of -- beat High Roller Technologies's return on equity of -488.01%.

Six Flags Entertainment has a consensus price target of $56.38, signalling upside risk potential of 17.76%. On the other hand High Roller Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Six Flags Entertainment has higher upside potential than High Roller Technologies, analysts believe Six Flags Entertainment is more attractive than High Roller Technologies.

Six Flags Entertainment has a beta of 1.575, which suggesting that the stock is 57.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Roller Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Six Flags Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. High Roller Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Six Flags Entertainment pays 49.06% of its earnings as a dividend. High Roller Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Six Flags Entertainment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Six Flags Entertainment quarterly revenues are $101.6M, which are larger than High Roller Technologies quarterly revenues of $7.5M. Six Flags Entertainment's net income of -$133.5M is lower than High Roller Technologies's net income of -$501K. Notably, Six Flags Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.05x while High Roller Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Six Flags Entertainment is 1.35x versus 1.12x for High Roller Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xponential Fitness has a net margin of -131.35% compared to Six Flags Entertainment's net margin of -16.64%. Six Flags Entertainment's return on equity of -- beat Xponential Fitness's return on equity of --.

Six Flags Entertainment has a consensus price target of $56.38, signalling upside risk potential of 17.76%. On the other hand Xponential Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $19.56 which suggests that it could grow by 36.75%. Given that Xponential Fitness has higher upside potential than Six Flags Entertainment, analysts believe Xponential Fitness is more attractive than Six Flags Entertainment.

Six Flags Entertainment has a beta of 1.575, which suggesting that the stock is 57.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Six Flags Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Xponential Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Six Flags Entertainment pays 49.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness pays out -40.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Six Flags Entertainment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Six Flags Entertainment quarterly revenues are $101.6M, which are larger than Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues of $80.5M. Six Flags Entertainment's net income of -$133.5M is lower than Xponential Fitness's net income of -$13.4M. Notably, Six Flags Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.05x while Xponential Fitness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Six Flags Entertainment is 1.35x versus 1.47x for Xponential Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.