FUN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

United Parks & Resorts has a net margin of -38.44% compared to Six Flags Entertainment's net margin of 7.26%. Six Flags Entertainment's return on equity of -32.55% beat United Parks & Resorts's return on equity of --.

Six Flags Entertainment has a consensus price target of $48.43, signalling upside risk potential of 35.54%. On the other hand United Parks & Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $57.42 which suggests that it could grow by 25.96%. Given that Six Flags Entertainment has higher upside potential than United Parks & Resorts, analysts believe Six Flags Entertainment is more attractive than United Parks & Resorts.

Six Flags Entertainment has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 16.024% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Parks & Resorts has a beta of 1.511, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.141%.

Six Flags Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. United Parks & Resorts offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Six Flags Entertainment pays -14.89% of its earnings as a dividend. United Parks & Resorts pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Six Flags Entertainment quarterly revenues are $687.3M, which are larger than United Parks & Resorts quarterly revenues of $384.4M. Six Flags Entertainment's net income of -$264.2M is lower than United Parks & Resorts's net income of $27.9M. Notably, Six Flags Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.05x while United Parks & Resorts's PE ratio is 11.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Six Flags Entertainment is 1.00x versus 1.60x for United Parks & Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

High Roller Technologies has a net margin of -38.44% compared to Six Flags Entertainment's net margin of -25.68%. Six Flags Entertainment's return on equity of -32.55% beat High Roller Technologies's return on equity of -387.82%.

Six Flags Entertainment has a consensus price target of $48.43, signalling upside risk potential of 35.54%. On the other hand High Roller Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Six Flags Entertainment has higher upside potential than High Roller Technologies, analysts believe Six Flags Entertainment is more attractive than High Roller Technologies.

Six Flags Entertainment has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 16.024% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Roller Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Six Flags Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. High Roller Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Six Flags Entertainment pays -14.89% of its earnings as a dividend. High Roller Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Six Flags Entertainment quarterly revenues are $687.3M, which are larger than High Roller Technologies quarterly revenues of $8.1M. Six Flags Entertainment's net income of -$264.2M is lower than High Roller Technologies's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Six Flags Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.05x while High Roller Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Six Flags Entertainment is 1.00x versus 0.83x for High Roller Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xponential Fitness has a net margin of -38.44% compared to Six Flags Entertainment's net margin of -51.4%. Six Flags Entertainment's return on equity of -32.55% beat Xponential Fitness's return on equity of --.

Six Flags Entertainment has a consensus price target of $48.43, signalling upside risk potential of 35.54%. On the other hand Xponential Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $14.30 which suggests that it could grow by 67.84%. Given that Xponential Fitness has higher upside potential than Six Flags Entertainment, analysts believe Xponential Fitness is more attractive than Six Flags Entertainment.

Six Flags Entertainment has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 16.024% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Six Flags Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Xponential Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Six Flags Entertainment pays -14.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness pays out -8.89% of its earnings as a dividend.

Six Flags Entertainment quarterly revenues are $687.3M, which are larger than Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues of $83.8M. Six Flags Entertainment's net income of -$264.2M is lower than Xponential Fitness's net income of -$43.1M. Notably, Six Flags Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.05x while Xponential Fitness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Six Flags Entertainment is 1.00x versus 0.85x for Xponential Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.