FUL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flamemaster Corp. has a net margin of 7.54% compared to H.B. Fuller Co.'s net margin of --. H.B. Fuller Co.'s return on equity of 6.2% beat Flamemaster Corp.'s return on equity of --.

H.B. Fuller Co. has a consensus price target of $68.57, signalling upside risk potential of 17.92%. On the other hand Flamemaster Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that H.B. Fuller Co. has higher upside potential than Flamemaster Corp., analysts believe H.B. Fuller Co. is more attractive than Flamemaster Corp..

H.B. Fuller Co. has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.407% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flamemaster Corp. has a beta of -0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 160.501%.

H.B. Fuller Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Flamemaster Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H.B. Fuller Co. pays 37.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Flamemaster Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H.B. Fuller Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller Co. quarterly revenues are $892M, which are larger than Flamemaster Corp. quarterly revenues of --. H.B. Fuller Co.'s net income of $67.2M is higher than Flamemaster Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, H.B. Fuller Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.94x while Flamemaster Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller Co. is 0.92x versus 4.12x for Flamemaster Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PPG Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 7.54% compared to H.B. Fuller Co.'s net margin of 10.73%. H.B. Fuller Co.'s return on equity of 6.2% beat PPG Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.06%.

H.B. Fuller Co. has a consensus price target of $68.57, signalling upside risk potential of 17.92%. On the other hand PPG Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $118.45 which suggests that it could grow by 17.66%. Given that H.B. Fuller Co. has higher upside potential than PPG Industries, Inc., analysts believe H.B. Fuller Co. is more attractive than PPG Industries, Inc..

H.B. Fuller Co. has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.407% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PPG Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.165, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.534%.

H.B. Fuller Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. PPG Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. H.B. Fuller Co. pays 37.93% of its earnings as a dividend. PPG Industries, Inc. pays out 44.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller Co. quarterly revenues are $892M, which are smaller than PPG Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.1B. H.B. Fuller Co.'s net income of $67.2M is lower than PPG Industries, Inc.'s net income of $438M. Notably, H.B. Fuller Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.94x while PPG Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller Co. is 0.92x versus 1.47x for PPG Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perimeter Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 7.54% compared to H.B. Fuller Co.'s net margin of -28.74%. H.B. Fuller Co.'s return on equity of 6.2% beat Perimeter Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.89%.

H.B. Fuller Co. has a consensus price target of $68.57, signalling upside risk potential of 17.92%. On the other hand Perimeter Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $31.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.52%. Given that H.B. Fuller Co. has higher upside potential than Perimeter Solutions, Inc., analysts believe H.B. Fuller Co. is more attractive than Perimeter Solutions, Inc..

H.B. Fuller Co. has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.407% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perimeter Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

H.B. Fuller Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Perimeter Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H.B. Fuller Co. pays 37.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Perimeter Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H.B. Fuller Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller Co. quarterly revenues are $892M, which are larger than Perimeter Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $315.4M. H.B. Fuller Co.'s net income of $67.2M is higher than Perimeter Solutions, Inc.'s net income of -$90.7M. Notably, H.B. Fuller Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.94x while Perimeter Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is 66.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller Co. is 0.92x versus 6.74x for Perimeter Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RPM International, Inc. has a net margin of 7.54% compared to H.B. Fuller Co.'s net margin of 10.74%. H.B. Fuller Co.'s return on equity of 6.2% beat RPM International, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.55%.

H.B. Fuller Co. has a consensus price target of $68.57, signalling upside risk potential of 17.92%. On the other hand RPM International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $132.29 which suggests that it could grow by 25.99%. Given that RPM International, Inc. has higher upside potential than H.B. Fuller Co., analysts believe RPM International, Inc. is more attractive than H.B. Fuller Co..

H.B. Fuller Co. has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.407% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RPM International, Inc. has a beta of 1.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.934%.

H.B. Fuller Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. RPM International, Inc. offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. H.B. Fuller Co. pays 37.93% of its earnings as a dividend. RPM International, Inc. pays out 37.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller Co. quarterly revenues are $892M, which are smaller than RPM International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. H.B. Fuller Co.'s net income of $67.2M is lower than RPM International, Inc.'s net income of $227M. Notably, H.B. Fuller Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.94x while RPM International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller Co. is 0.92x versus 1.79x for RPM International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.