How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?
Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…
Buy
63
FSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.58
Seasonality move
:
8.78%
Day range:
$10.09 - $10.71
52-week range:
$4.13 - $12.54
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
14.28x
P/S ratio:
3.27x
P/B ratio:
1.99x
Volume:
14.2M
Avg. volume:
8.2M
1-year change:
102.88%
Market cap:
$3.2B
Revenue:
$1.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.74
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSM
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$265M | $0.24 | -12.46% | 110.64% | $14.00 |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$4.5M | -$0.00 | 91.21% | -86.7% | $5.96 |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
$71.8M | $0.20 | 80.97% | -- | $27.30 |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.03 | -- | -91.18% | $60.49 |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$60.6M | -- | -51.92% | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSM
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$10.57 | $14.00 | $3.2B | 14.28x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.27x |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
$1.94 | -- | $26.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$4.55 | $5.96 | $1B | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 53.63x |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
$25.64 | $27.30 | $1.5B | 3.42x | $0.00 | 0% | 8.26x |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
$29.64 | $60.49 | $3.2B | 250.29x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$0.0550 | -- | $3.7M | 2.02x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.01x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSM
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
11.65% | -1.997 | 7.61% | 2.35x |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
-- | 0.822 | -- | 43.32x |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
8.34% | 1.638 | 7.69% | 1.57x |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
20.73% | 1.799 | 13.71% | 1.33x |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
35.61% | 0.964 | 16.75% | 2.67x |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
28.31% | 176.835 | 51.97% | 0.37x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSM
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$131M | $105.3M | 14.89% | 16.84% | 42.05% | $63.4M |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
-$700 | -$313.5K | -19.82% | -19.82% | -- | -$934.5K |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$2.8M | $572K | -1.05% | -1.15% | 13.79% | $1.3M |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
$102K | -$7.6M | -2.04% | -2.43% | -15.09% | -$5.6M |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-$42.1K | -$3.4M | -3.35% | -5.31% | -- | -$40.1M |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$6.7M | $4.2M | 1.83% | 2.62% | -8.2% | $13.4M |
Fortuna Mining Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FSM or AUST?
Austin Gold Corp. has a net margin of 51.21% compared to Fortuna Mining Corp.'s net margin of --. Fortuna Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 16.84% beat Austin Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -19.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSMFortuna Mining Corp.52.32% $0.37 $1.9B AUSTAustin Gold Corp.-- -$0.02 $8.8M -
What do Analysts Say About FSM or AUST?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.45%. On the other hand Austin Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 54.74%. Given that Austin Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Fortuna Mining Corp., analysts believe Austin Gold Corp. is more attractive than Fortuna Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSMFortuna Mining Corp.1 0 1 AUSTAustin Gold Corp.0 0 0 -
Is FSM or AUST More Risky?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.884, which suggesting that the stock is 11.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Austin Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSM or AUST?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Austin Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortuna Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Austin Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSM or AUST?
Fortuna Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $250.3M, which are larger than Austin Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Fortuna Mining Corp.'s net income of $128.2M is higher than Austin Gold Corp.'s net income of -$270.8K. Notably, Fortuna Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.28x while Austin Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortuna Mining Corp. is 3.27x versus -- for Austin Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSMFortuna Mining Corp.3.27x 14.28x $250.3M $128.2M AUSTAustin Gold Corp.-- -- -- -$270.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns FSM or GROY?
Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of 51.21% compared to Fortuna Mining Corp.'s net margin of -27.31%. Fortuna Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 16.84% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSMFortuna Mining Corp.52.32% $0.37 $1.9B GROYGold Royalty Corp.68.47% -$0.01 $610.9M -
What do Analysts Say About FSM or GROY?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.45%. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.96 which suggests that it could grow by 31.08%. Given that Fortuna Mining Corp. has higher upside potential than Gold Royalty Corp., analysts believe Fortuna Mining Corp. is more attractive than Gold Royalty Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSMFortuna Mining Corp.1 0 1 GROYGold Royalty Corp.2 1 0 -
Is FSM or GROY More Risky?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.884, which suggesting that the stock is 11.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSM or GROY?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Fortuna Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSM or GROY?
Fortuna Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $250.3M, which are larger than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Fortuna Mining Corp.'s net income of $128.2M is higher than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Fortuna Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.28x while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortuna Mining Corp. is 3.27x versus 53.63x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSMFortuna Mining Corp.3.27x 14.28x $250.3M $128.2M GROYGold Royalty Corp.53.63x -- $4.1M -$1.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns FSM or MUX?
McEwen, Inc. has a net margin of 51.21% compared to Fortuna Mining Corp.'s net margin of -0.91%. Fortuna Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 16.84% beat McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSMFortuna Mining Corp.52.32% $0.37 $1.9B MUXMcEwen, Inc.0.2% -$0.01 $616.3M -
What do Analysts Say About FSM or MUX?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.45%. On the other hand McEwen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.30 which suggests that it could grow by 6.47%. Given that Fortuna Mining Corp. has higher upside potential than McEwen, Inc., analysts believe Fortuna Mining Corp. is more attractive than McEwen, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSMFortuna Mining Corp.1 0 1 MUXMcEwen, Inc.5 0 0 -
Is FSM or MUX More Risky?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.884, which suggesting that the stock is 11.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.127, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.677%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSM or MUX?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortuna Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSM or MUX?
Fortuna Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $250.3M, which are larger than McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. Fortuna Mining Corp.'s net income of $128.2M is higher than McEwen, Inc.'s net income of -$462K. Notably, Fortuna Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.28x while McEwen, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortuna Mining Corp. is 3.27x versus 8.26x for McEwen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSMFortuna Mining Corp.3.27x 14.28x $250.3M $128.2M MUXMcEwen, Inc.8.26x 3.42x $50.5M -$462K
-
Which has Higher Returns FSM or SA?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of 51.21% compared to Fortuna Mining Corp.'s net margin of --. Fortuna Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 16.84% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSMFortuna Mining Corp.52.32% $0.37 $1.9B SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- -$0.23 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About FSM or SA?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.45%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $60.49 which suggests that it could grow by 104.08%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fortuna Mining Corp., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Fortuna Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSMFortuna Mining Corp.1 0 1 SASeabridge Gold, Inc.3 0 0 -
Is FSM or SA More Risky?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.884, which suggesting that the stock is 11.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.807, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.253%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSM or SA?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortuna Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSM or SA?
Fortuna Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $250.3M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Fortuna Mining Corp.'s net income of $128.2M is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Fortuna Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.28x while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortuna Mining Corp. is 3.27x versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSMFortuna Mining Corp.3.27x 14.28x $250.3M $128.2M SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- 250.29x -- -$23.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns FSM or VITFF?
Victoria Gold Corp. has a net margin of 51.21% compared to Fortuna Mining Corp.'s net margin of -10.81%. Fortuna Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 16.84% beat Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSMFortuna Mining Corp.52.32% $0.37 $1.9B VITFFVictoria Gold Corp.10.82% -$0.10 $608M -
What do Analysts Say About FSM or VITFF?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.45%. On the other hand Victoria Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortuna Mining Corp. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe Fortuna Mining Corp. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSMFortuna Mining Corp.1 0 1 VITFFVictoria Gold Corp.0 0 0 -
Is FSM or VITFF More Risky?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.884, which suggesting that the stock is 11.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 19.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1824.925%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSM or VITFF?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortuna Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSM or VITFF?
Fortuna Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $250.3M, which are larger than Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $61.5M. Fortuna Mining Corp.'s net income of $128.2M is higher than Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Fortuna Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.28x while Victoria Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortuna Mining Corp. is 3.27x versus 0.01x for Victoria Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSMFortuna Mining Corp.3.27x 14.28x $250.3M $128.2M VITFFVictoria Gold Corp.0.01x 2.02x $61.5M -$6.7M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
73
ENPH alert for Feb 5
Enphase Energy, Inc. [ENPH] is up 38.57% over the past day.
Sell
1
PYPL alert for Feb 4
PayPal Holdings, Inc. [PYPL] is down 1.61% over the past day.
Sell
44
SHNY alert for Feb 4
MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN [SHNY] is up 0.3% over the past day.
