FOUR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has a net margin of 2.84% compared to Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s net margin of 19.57%. Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.76% beat Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s return on equity of 71.7%.

Shift4 Payments, Inc. has a consensus price target of $95.43, signalling upside risk potential of 37.58%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $293.23 which suggests that it could grow by 13.04%. Given that Shift4 Payments, Inc. has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, Inc., analysts believe Shift4 Payments, Inc. is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing, Inc..

Shift4 Payments, Inc. has a beta of 1.681, which suggesting that the stock is 68.066% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has a beta of 0.857, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.307%.

Shift4 Payments, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Shift4 Payments, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. pays out 60.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shift4 Payments, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s net income of $33.4M is lower than Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s net income of $1B. Notably, Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.56x while Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments, Inc. is 1.63x versus 5.06x for Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fair Isaac Corp. has a net margin of 2.84% compared to Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s net margin of 30.06%. Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.76% beat Fair Isaac Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Shift4 Payments, Inc. has a consensus price target of $95.43, signalling upside risk potential of 37.58%. On the other hand Fair Isaac Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2,031.78 which suggests that it could grow by 14.67%. Given that Shift4 Payments, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac Corp., analysts believe Shift4 Payments, Inc. is more attractive than Fair Isaac Corp..

Shift4 Payments, Inc. has a beta of 1.681, which suggesting that the stock is 68.066% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fair Isaac Corp. has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.242%.

Shift4 Payments, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fair Isaac Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shift4 Payments, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fair Isaac Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shift4 Payments, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Fair Isaac Corp. quarterly revenues of $515.8M. Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s net income of $33.4M is lower than Fair Isaac Corp.'s net income of $155M. Notably, Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.56x while Fair Isaac Corp.'s PE ratio is 66.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments, Inc. is 1.63x versus 21.86x for Fair Isaac Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grindr, Inc. has a net margin of 2.84% compared to Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s net margin of 26.64%. Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.76% beat Grindr, Inc.'s return on equity of -56.94%.

Shift4 Payments, Inc. has a consensus price target of $95.43, signalling upside risk potential of 37.58%. On the other hand Grindr, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.75 which suggests that it could grow by 59.58%. Given that Grindr, Inc. has higher upside potential than Shift4 Payments, Inc., analysts believe Grindr, Inc. is more attractive than Shift4 Payments, Inc..

Shift4 Payments, Inc. has a beta of 1.681, which suggesting that the stock is 68.066% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grindr, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Shift4 Payments, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grindr, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shift4 Payments, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grindr, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shift4 Payments, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Grindr, Inc. quarterly revenues of $115.8M. Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s net income of $33.4M is higher than Grindr, Inc.'s net income of $30.8M. Notably, Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.56x while Grindr, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments, Inc. is 1.63x versus 6.38x for Grindr, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo, Inc. has a net margin of 2.84% compared to Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s net margin of -7.71%. Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.76% beat Inuvo, Inc.'s return on equity of -35.27%.

Shift4 Payments, Inc. has a consensus price target of $95.43, signalling upside risk potential of 37.58%. On the other hand Inuvo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.88 which suggests that it could grow by 278.92%. Given that Inuvo, Inc. has higher upside potential than Shift4 Payments, Inc., analysts believe Inuvo, Inc. is more attractive than Shift4 Payments, Inc..

Shift4 Payments, Inc. has a beta of 1.681, which suggesting that the stock is 68.066% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo, Inc. has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.66%.

Shift4 Payments, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shift4 Payments, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shift4 Payments, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Inuvo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22.6M. Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s net income of $33.4M is higher than Inuvo, Inc.'s net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.56x while Inuvo, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments, Inc. is 1.63x versus 2.28x for Inuvo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.