Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
33
EEFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$72.50
Seasonality move
:
1.47%
Day range:
$70.37 - $72.52
52-week range:
$64.34 - $114.25
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
10.43x
P/S ratio:
0.78x
P/B ratio:
2.41x
Volume:
726.6K
Avg. volume:
702.7K
1-year change:
-31.63%
Market cap:
$3B
Revenue:
$4.2B
EPS (TTM):
$6.95
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EEFT
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.
|
$1.1B | $3.03 | 5.9% | 70.56% | $86.43 |
|
BSY
Bentley Systems, Inc.
|
$401.6M | $0.33 | 10.67% | 29.91% | $53.71 |
|
CMRC
Commerce.com, Inc.
|
$86.8M | $0.08 | 0.83% | -- | $4.96 |
|
DAVE
Dave, Inc.
|
$155.7M | $3.43 | 30.04% | 66.57% | $300.11 |
|
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
|
$1.3B | $1.51 | 34.36% | 471.53% | $88.39 |
|
PAR
PAR Technology Corp.
|
$123.9M | $0.12 | 15.36% | -96.21% | $59.11 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EEFT
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.
|
$72.50 | $86.43 | $3B | 10.43x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.78x |
|
BSY
Bentley Systems, Inc.
|
$33.84 | $53.71 | $10.3B | 40.87x | $0.07 | 0.83% | 7.73x |
|
CMRC
Commerce.com, Inc.
|
$3.02 | $4.96 | $245.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.71x |
|
DAVE
Dave, Inc.
|
$176.51 | $300.11 | $2.4B | 17.49x | $0.00 | 0% | 5.22x |
|
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
|
$58.49 | $88.39 | $4B | 27.46x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.38x |
|
PAR
PAR Technology Corp.
|
$21.87 | $59.11 | $887.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.97x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EEFT
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.
|
62.21% | -0.364 | 68.04% | 0.53x |
|
BSY
Bentley Systems, Inc.
|
51.77% | 1.717 | 8.21% | 0.53x |
|
CMRC
Commerce.com, Inc.
|
53.28% | 0.963 | 13.41% | 1.78x |
|
DAVE
Dave, Inc.
|
20.54% | 6.957 | 2.79% | 9.02x |
|
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
|
74.15% | 2.048 | 69.87% | 1.31x |
|
PAR
PAR Technology Corp.
|
32.44% | 0.798 | 25.04% | 1.26x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EEFT
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.
|
$218M | $101.2M | 8.66% | 24.22% | 9.13% | $158.3M |
|
BSY
Bentley Systems, Inc.
|
$295.2M | $86.7M | 10.96% | 24.3% | 23.07% | $110.7M |
|
CMRC
Commerce.com, Inc.
|
$68.4M | $849K | -10.11% | -50.27% | 0.95% | -$266K |
|
DAVE
Dave, Inc.
|
$109.1M | $45.9M | 51.52% | 70.09% | 30.45% | $81.5M |
|
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
|
$343.2M | $141.4M | 4.71% | 15.76% | 12.02% | $98.1M |
|
PAR
PAR Technology Corp.
|
$45.8M | -$14.5M | -7.22% | -10.83% | -12.13% | $5.2M |
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns EEFT or BSY?
Bentley Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 4.82% compared to Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s net margin of 15.25%. Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.22% beat Bentley Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EEFTEuronet Worldwide, Inc.19.66% $1.08 $3.5B BSYBentley Systems, Inc.78.61% $0.18 $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About EEFT or BSY?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has a consensus price target of $86.43, signalling upside risk potential of 19.21%. On the other hand Bentley Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $53.71 which suggests that it could grow by 58.73%. Given that Bentley Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Euronet Worldwide, Inc., analysts believe Bentley Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Euronet Worldwide, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EEFTEuronet Worldwide, Inc.5 2 1 BSYBentley Systems, Inc.8 6 0 -
Is EEFT or BSY More Risky?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has a beta of 0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 17.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bentley Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.210, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.981%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EEFT or BSY?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bentley Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Euronet Worldwide, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bentley Systems, Inc. pays out 33.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Bentley Systems, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EEFT or BSY?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Bentley Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $375.5M. Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s net income of $53.4M is lower than Bentley Systems, Inc.'s net income of $57.3M. Notably, Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.43x while Bentley Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 40.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euronet Worldwide, Inc. is 0.78x versus 7.73x for Bentley Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EEFTEuronet Worldwide, Inc.0.78x 10.43x $1.1B $53.4M BSYBentley Systems, Inc.7.73x 40.87x $375.5M $57.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns EEFT or CMRC?
Commerce.com, Inc. has a net margin of 4.82% compared to Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s net margin of -9.34%. Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.22% beat Commerce.com, Inc.'s return on equity of -50.27%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EEFTEuronet Worldwide, Inc.19.66% $1.08 $3.5B CMRCCommerce.com, Inc.76.37% -$0.10 $84.2M -
What do Analysts Say About EEFT or CMRC?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has a consensus price target of $86.43, signalling upside risk potential of 19.21%. On the other hand Commerce.com, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.96 which suggests that it could grow by 64.38%. Given that Commerce.com, Inc. has higher upside potential than Euronet Worldwide, Inc., analysts believe Commerce.com, Inc. is more attractive than Euronet Worldwide, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EEFTEuronet Worldwide, Inc.5 2 1 CMRCCommerce.com, Inc.1 5 1 -
Is EEFT or CMRC More Risky?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has a beta of 0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 17.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commerce.com, Inc. has a beta of 1.148, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.798%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EEFT or CMRC?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commerce.com, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euronet Worldwide, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commerce.com, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EEFT or CMRC?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Commerce.com, Inc. quarterly revenues of $89.5M. Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s net income of $53.4M is higher than Commerce.com, Inc.'s net income of -$8.4M. Notably, Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.43x while Commerce.com, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euronet Worldwide, Inc. is 0.78x versus 0.71x for Commerce.com, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EEFTEuronet Worldwide, Inc.0.78x 10.43x $1.1B $53.4M CMRCCommerce.com, Inc.0.71x -- $89.5M -$8.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns EEFT or DAVE?
Dave, Inc. has a net margin of 4.82% compared to Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s net margin of 61.09%. Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.22% beat Dave, Inc.'s return on equity of 70.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EEFTEuronet Worldwide, Inc.19.66% $1.08 $3.5B DAVEDave, Inc.72.38% $6.34 $366.6M -
What do Analysts Say About EEFT or DAVE?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has a consensus price target of $86.43, signalling upside risk potential of 19.21%. On the other hand Dave, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $300.11 which suggests that it could grow by 70.03%. Given that Dave, Inc. has higher upside potential than Euronet Worldwide, Inc., analysts believe Dave, Inc. is more attractive than Euronet Worldwide, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EEFTEuronet Worldwide, Inc.5 2 1 DAVEDave, Inc.6 0 0 -
Is EEFT or DAVE More Risky?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has a beta of 0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 17.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dave, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EEFT or DAVE?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dave, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euronet Worldwide, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dave, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EEFT or DAVE?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Dave, Inc. quarterly revenues of $150.7M. Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s net income of $53.4M is lower than Dave, Inc.'s net income of $92.1M. Notably, Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.43x while Dave, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euronet Worldwide, Inc. is 0.78x versus 5.22x for Dave, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EEFTEuronet Worldwide, Inc.0.78x 10.43x $1.1B $53.4M DAVEDave, Inc.5.22x 17.49x $150.7M $92.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns EEFT or FOUR?
Shift4 Payments, Inc. has a net margin of 4.82% compared to Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s net margin of 2.84%. Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.22% beat Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EEFTEuronet Worldwide, Inc.19.66% $1.08 $3.5B FOURShift4 Payments, Inc.29.16% $0.17 $7B -
What do Analysts Say About EEFT or FOUR?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has a consensus price target of $86.43, signalling upside risk potential of 19.21%. On the other hand Shift4 Payments, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $88.39 which suggests that it could grow by 51.12%. Given that Shift4 Payments, Inc. has higher upside potential than Euronet Worldwide, Inc., analysts believe Shift4 Payments, Inc. is more attractive than Euronet Worldwide, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EEFTEuronet Worldwide, Inc.5 2 1 FOURShift4 Payments, Inc.15 8 0 -
Is EEFT or FOUR More Risky?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has a beta of 0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 17.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shift4 Payments, Inc. has a beta of 1.633, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.284%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EEFT or FOUR?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shift4 Payments, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euronet Worldwide, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shift4 Payments, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EEFT or FOUR?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Shift4 Payments, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s net income of $53.4M is higher than Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s net income of $33.4M. Notably, Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.43x while Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euronet Worldwide, Inc. is 0.78x versus 1.38x for Shift4 Payments, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EEFTEuronet Worldwide, Inc.0.78x 10.43x $1.1B $53.4M FOURShift4 Payments, Inc.1.38x 27.46x $1.2B $33.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns EEFT or PAR?
PAR Technology Corp. has a net margin of 4.82% compared to Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s net margin of -15.25%. Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.22% beat PAR Technology Corp.'s return on equity of -10.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EEFTEuronet Worldwide, Inc.19.66% $1.08 $3.5B PARPAR Technology Corp.38.45% -$0.45 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About EEFT or PAR?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has a consensus price target of $86.43, signalling upside risk potential of 19.21%. On the other hand PAR Technology Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $59.11 which suggests that it could grow by 170.28%. Given that PAR Technology Corp. has higher upside potential than Euronet Worldwide, Inc., analysts believe PAR Technology Corp. is more attractive than Euronet Worldwide, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EEFTEuronet Worldwide, Inc.5 2 1 PARPAR Technology Corp.8 1 0 -
Is EEFT or PAR More Risky?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has a beta of 0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 17.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PAR Technology Corp. has a beta of 1.348, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.783%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EEFT or PAR?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PAR Technology Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euronet Worldwide, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PAR Technology Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EEFT or PAR?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than PAR Technology Corp. quarterly revenues of $119.2M. Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s net income of $53.4M is higher than PAR Technology Corp.'s net income of -$18.2M. Notably, Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.43x while PAR Technology Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euronet Worldwide, Inc. is 0.78x versus 1.97x for PAR Technology Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EEFTEuronet Worldwide, Inc.0.78x 10.43x $1.1B $53.4M PARPAR Technology Corp.1.97x -- $119.2M -$18.2M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
