FIHL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Overseas Group has a net margin of 14.77% compared to Fidelis Insurance Holdings's net margin of --. Fidelis Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 18.87% beat American Overseas Group's return on equity of --.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.11, signalling upside risk potential of 30.53%. On the other hand American Overseas Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelis Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than American Overseas Group, analysts believe Fidelis Insurance Holdings is more attractive than American Overseas Group.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Overseas Group has a beta of 0.309, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.116%.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. American Overseas Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fidelis Insurance Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Overseas Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $681.3M, which are larger than American Overseas Group quarterly revenues of --. Fidelis Insurance Holdings's net income of $100.6M is higher than American Overseas Group's net income of --. Notably, Fidelis Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.41x while American Overseas Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelis Insurance Holdings is 0.87x versus -- for American Overseas Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Conifer Holdings has a net margin of 14.77% compared to Fidelis Insurance Holdings's net margin of -14.12%. Fidelis Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 18.87% beat Conifer Holdings's return on equity of 232.39%.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.11, signalling upside risk potential of 30.53%. On the other hand Conifer Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -43.53%. Given that Fidelis Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than Conifer Holdings, analysts believe Fidelis Insurance Holdings is more attractive than Conifer Holdings.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conifer Holdings has a beta of 0.563, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.716%.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Conifer Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fidelis Insurance Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conifer Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $681.3M, which are larger than Conifer Holdings quarterly revenues of $16M. Fidelis Insurance Holdings's net income of $100.6M is higher than Conifer Holdings's net income of $53.3M. Notably, Fidelis Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.41x while Conifer Holdings's PE ratio is 0.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelis Insurance Holdings is 0.87x versus 0.15x for Conifer Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Essent Group has a net margin of 14.77% compared to Fidelis Insurance Holdings's net margin of 55.65%. Fidelis Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 18.87% beat Essent Group's return on equity of 14.09%.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.11, signalling upside risk potential of 30.53%. On the other hand Essent Group has an analysts' consensus of $64.25 which suggests that it could grow by 19.87%. Given that Fidelis Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than Essent Group, analysts believe Fidelis Insurance Holdings is more attractive than Essent Group.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Essent Group has a beta of 1.107, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.678%.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Essent Group offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Fidelis Insurance Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Essent Group pays out 15.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Essent Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $681.3M, which are larger than Essent Group quarterly revenues of $316.6M. Fidelis Insurance Holdings's net income of $100.6M is lower than Essent Group's net income of $176.2M. Notably, Fidelis Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.41x while Essent Group's PE ratio is 7.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelis Insurance Holdings is 0.87x versus 4.67x for Essent Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

James River Group Holdings has a net margin of 14.77% compared to Fidelis Insurance Holdings's net margin of -20.57%. Fidelis Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 18.87% beat James River Group Holdings's return on equity of -24.25%.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.11, signalling upside risk potential of 30.53%. On the other hand James River Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $8.15 which suggests that it could grow by 56.97%. Given that James River Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Fidelis Insurance Holdings, analysts believe James River Group Holdings is more attractive than Fidelis Insurance Holdings.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison James River Group Holdings has a beta of 0.064, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.576%.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. James River Group Holdings offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Fidelis Insurance Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. James River Group Holdings pays out -18% of its earnings as a dividend.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $681.3M, which are larger than James River Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $191.5M. Fidelis Insurance Holdings's net income of $100.6M is higher than James River Group Holdings's net income of -$39.4M. Notably, Fidelis Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.41x while James River Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelis Insurance Holdings is 0.87x versus 0.24x for James River Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.