ESNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Overseas Group Ltd. has a net margin of 53.68% compared to Essent Group Ltd.'s net margin of 15.78%. Essent Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.41% beat American Overseas Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 21.21%.

Essent Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of $68.63, signalling upside risk potential of 9.07%. On the other hand American Overseas Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Essent Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than American Overseas Group Ltd., analysts believe Essent Group Ltd. is more attractive than American Overseas Group Ltd..

Essent Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.489% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Overseas Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.779, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.111%.

Essent Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. American Overseas Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Essent Group Ltd. pays 16.36% of its earnings as a dividend. American Overseas Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Essent Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essent Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $305.9M, which are larger than American Overseas Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $18M. Essent Group Ltd.'s net income of $164.2M is higher than American Overseas Group Ltd.'s net income of $2.8M. Notably, Essent Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.16x while American Overseas Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 5.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essent Group Ltd. is 5.18x versus 0.82x for American Overseas Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Indemnity Group LLC has a net margin of 53.68% compared to Essent Group Ltd.'s net margin of 10.97%. Essent Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.41% beat Global Indemnity Group LLC's return on equity of 4.03%.

Essent Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of $68.63, signalling upside risk potential of 9.07%. On the other hand Global Indemnity Group LLC has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 92.11%. Given that Global Indemnity Group LLC has higher upside potential than Essent Group Ltd., analysts believe Global Indemnity Group LLC is more attractive than Essent Group Ltd..

Essent Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.489% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Indemnity Group LLC has a beta of 0.420, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.044%.

Essent Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Global Indemnity Group LLC offers a yield of 4.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Essent Group Ltd. pays 16.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Indemnity Group LLC pays out 44.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essent Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $305.9M, which are larger than Global Indemnity Group LLC quarterly revenues of $114.2M. Essent Group Ltd.'s net income of $164.2M is higher than Global Indemnity Group LLC's net income of $12.5M. Notably, Essent Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.16x while Global Indemnity Group LLC's PE ratio is 14.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essent Group Ltd. is 5.18x versus 0.91x for Global Indemnity Group LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HCI Group, Inc. has a net margin of 53.68% compared to Essent Group Ltd.'s net margin of 31.38%. Essent Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.41% beat HCI Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 34.65%.

Essent Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of $68.63, signalling upside risk potential of 9.07%. On the other hand HCI Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $245.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.41%. Given that HCI Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Essent Group Ltd., analysts believe HCI Group, Inc. is more attractive than Essent Group Ltd..

Essent Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.489% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCI Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.537%.

Essent Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. HCI Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Essent Group Ltd. pays 16.36% of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group, Inc. pays out 18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essent Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $305.9M, which are larger than HCI Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $216.4M. Essent Group Ltd.'s net income of $164.2M is higher than HCI Group, Inc.'s net income of $67.9M. Notably, Essent Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.16x while HCI Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essent Group Ltd. is 5.18x versus 2.39x for HCI Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NMI Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 53.68% compared to Essent Group Ltd.'s net margin of 53.73%. Essent Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.41% beat NMI Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.32%.

Essent Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of $68.63, signalling upside risk potential of 9.07%. On the other hand NMI Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $45.14 which suggests that it could grow by 16.59%. Given that NMI Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Essent Group Ltd., analysts believe NMI Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Essent Group Ltd..

Essent Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.489% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NMI Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.657, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.281%.

Essent Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. NMI Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Essent Group Ltd. pays 16.36% of its earnings as a dividend. NMI Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Essent Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essent Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $305.9M, which are larger than NMI Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $178.7M. Essent Group Ltd.'s net income of $164.2M is higher than NMI Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $96M. Notably, Essent Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.16x while NMI Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essent Group Ltd. is 5.18x versus 4.45x for NMI Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.