ESNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conifer Holdings has a net margin of 55.65% compared to Essent Group's net margin of -14.12%. Essent Group's return on equity of 14.09% beat Conifer Holdings's return on equity of 232.39%.

Essent Group has a consensus price target of $64.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.56%. On the other hand Conifer Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -42.45%. Given that Essent Group has higher upside potential than Conifer Holdings, analysts believe Essent Group is more attractive than Conifer Holdings.

Essent Group has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.678% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conifer Holdings has a beta of 0.563, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.716%.

Essent Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Conifer Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Essent Group pays 15.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Conifer Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Essent Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essent Group quarterly revenues are $316.6M, which are larger than Conifer Holdings quarterly revenues of $16M. Essent Group's net income of $176.2M is higher than Conifer Holdings's net income of $53.3M. Notably, Essent Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Conifer Holdings's PE ratio is 0.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essent Group is 4.72x versus 0.15x for Conifer Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings has a net margin of 55.65% compared to Essent Group's net margin of 14.77%. Essent Group's return on equity of 14.09% beat Fidelis Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 18.87%.

Essent Group has a consensus price target of $64.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.56%. On the other hand Fidelis Insurance Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $22.11 which suggests that it could grow by 30.6%. Given that Fidelis Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than Essent Group, analysts believe Fidelis Insurance Holdings is more attractive than Essent Group.

Essent Group has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.678% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelis Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Essent Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Fidelis Insurance Holdings offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Essent Group pays 15.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelis Insurance Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Essent Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essent Group quarterly revenues are $316.6M, which are smaller than Fidelis Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues of $681.3M. Essent Group's net income of $176.2M is higher than Fidelis Insurance Holdings's net income of $100.6M. Notably, Essent Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Fidelis Insurance Holdings's PE ratio is 4.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essent Group is 4.72x versus 0.87x for Fidelis Insurance Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

James River Group Holdings has a net margin of 55.65% compared to Essent Group's net margin of -20.57%. Essent Group's return on equity of 14.09% beat James River Group Holdings's return on equity of -24.25%.

Essent Group has a consensus price target of $64.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.56%. On the other hand James River Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $8.15 which suggests that it could grow by 58.61%. Given that James River Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Essent Group, analysts believe James River Group Holdings is more attractive than Essent Group.

Essent Group has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.678% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison James River Group Holdings has a beta of 0.064, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.576%.

Essent Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. James River Group Holdings offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Essent Group pays 15.25% of its earnings as a dividend. James River Group Holdings pays out -18% of its earnings as a dividend. Essent Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essent Group quarterly revenues are $316.6M, which are larger than James River Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $191.5M. Essent Group's net income of $176.2M is higher than James River Group Holdings's net income of -$39.4M. Notably, Essent Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while James River Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essent Group is 4.72x versus 0.24x for James River Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palomar Holdings has a net margin of 55.65% compared to Essent Group's net margin of 20.56%. Essent Group's return on equity of 14.09% beat Palomar Holdings's return on equity of 20.63%.

Essent Group has a consensus price target of $64.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.56%. On the other hand Palomar Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $119.50 which suggests that it could grow by 13.3%. Given that Essent Group has higher upside potential than Palomar Holdings, analysts believe Essent Group is more attractive than Palomar Holdings.

Essent Group has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.678% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palomar Holdings has a beta of 0.377, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.282%.

Essent Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Palomar Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Essent Group pays 15.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Palomar Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Essent Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essent Group quarterly revenues are $316.6M, which are larger than Palomar Holdings quarterly revenues of $148.4M. Essent Group's net income of $176.2M is higher than Palomar Holdings's net income of $30.5M. Notably, Essent Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Palomar Holdings's PE ratio is 25.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essent Group is 4.72x versus 5.39x for Palomar Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.