DTC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flanigan'S Enterprises has a net margin of -74.21% compared to Solo Brands's net margin of 0.4%. Solo Brands's return on equity of -51.87% beat Flanigan'S Enterprises's return on equity of 4.46%.

Solo Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 85.74%. On the other hand Flanigan'S Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solo Brands has higher upside potential than Flanigan'S Enterprises, analysts believe Solo Brands is more attractive than Flanigan'S Enterprises.

Solo Brands has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flanigan'S Enterprises has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.806%.

Solo Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flanigan'S Enterprises offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Solo Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan'S Enterprises pays out 27.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan'S Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Solo Brands quarterly revenues are $94.1M, which are larger than Flanigan'S Enterprises quarterly revenues of $46M. Solo Brands's net income of -$69.9M is lower than Flanigan'S Enterprises's net income of $184K. Notably, Solo Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flanigan'S Enterprises's PE ratio is 13.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solo Brands is 0.13x versus 0.25x for Flanigan'S Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clarus has a net margin of -74.21% compared to Solo Brands's net margin of -4.7%. Solo Brands's return on equity of -51.87% beat Clarus's return on equity of 1.61%.

Solo Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 85.74%. On the other hand Clarus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.38%. Given that Solo Brands has higher upside potential than Clarus, analysts believe Solo Brands is more attractive than Clarus.

Solo Brands has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clarus has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.424%.

Solo Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Clarus offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Solo Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clarus pays out -36.96% of its earnings as a dividend.

Solo Brands quarterly revenues are $94.1M, which are larger than Clarus quarterly revenues of $67.1M. Solo Brands's net income of -$69.9M is lower than Clarus's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Solo Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Clarus's PE ratio is 34.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solo Brands is 0.13x versus 0.63x for Clarus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Acushnet Holdings has a net margin of -74.21% compared to Solo Brands's net margin of 9.06%. Solo Brands's return on equity of -51.87% beat Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 20.37%.

Solo Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 85.74%. On the other hand Acushnet Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $73.13 which suggests that it could grow by 0.92%. Given that Solo Brands has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Solo Brands is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

Solo Brands has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.878, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.156%.

Solo Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Acushnet Holdings offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Solo Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings pays out 26.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Solo Brands quarterly revenues are $94.1M, which are smaller than Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues of $620.5M. Solo Brands's net income of -$69.9M is lower than Acushnet Holdings's net income of $56.2M. Notably, Solo Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Acushnet Holdings's PE ratio is 24.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solo Brands is 0.13x versus 1.92x for Acushnet Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Johnson Outdoors has a net margin of -74.21% compared to Solo Brands's net margin of -32.37%. Solo Brands's return on equity of -51.87% beat Johnson Outdoors's return on equity of -5.38%.

Solo Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 85.74%. On the other hand Johnson Outdoors has an analysts' consensus of $52.00 which suggests that it could grow by 45.52%. Given that Solo Brands has higher upside potential than Johnson Outdoors, analysts believe Solo Brands is more attractive than Johnson Outdoors.

Solo Brands has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson Outdoors has a beta of 0.687, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.327%.

Solo Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Johnson Outdoors offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Solo Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Outdoors pays out -50.62% of its earnings as a dividend.

Solo Brands quarterly revenues are $94.1M, which are smaller than Johnson Outdoors quarterly revenues of $105.9M. Solo Brands's net income of -$69.9M is lower than Johnson Outdoors's net income of -$34.3M. Notably, Solo Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Johnson Outdoors's PE ratio is 89.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solo Brands is 0.13x versus 0.59x for Johnson Outdoors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.