CXM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Braze, Inc. has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Sprinklr, Inc.'s net margin of -18.76%. Sprinklr, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.76% beat Braze, Inc.'s return on equity of -22.29%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 34.96%. On the other hand Braze, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $46.95 which suggests that it could grow by 36.19%. Given that Braze, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sprinklr, Inc., analysts believe Braze, Inc. is more attractive than Sprinklr, Inc..

Sprinklr, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Braze, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Braze, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprinklr, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Braze, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprinklr, Inc. quarterly revenues are $219.1M, which are larger than Braze, Inc. quarterly revenues of $190.8M. Sprinklr, Inc.'s net income of $2.9M is higher than Braze, Inc.'s net income of -$35.8M. Notably, Sprinklr, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.39x while Braze, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr, Inc. is 2.41x versus 5.22x for Braze, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo, Inc. has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Sprinklr, Inc.'s net margin of -7.71%. Sprinklr, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.76% beat Inuvo, Inc.'s return on equity of -35.27%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 34.96%. On the other hand Inuvo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.88 which suggests that it could grow by 338.51%. Given that Inuvo, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sprinklr, Inc., analysts believe Inuvo, Inc. is more attractive than Sprinklr, Inc..

Sprinklr, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo, Inc. has a beta of 0.920, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.024%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprinklr, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprinklr, Inc. quarterly revenues are $219.1M, which are larger than Inuvo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22.6M. Sprinklr, Inc.'s net income of $2.9M is higher than Inuvo, Inc.'s net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Sprinklr, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.39x while Inuvo, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr, Inc. is 2.41x versus 1.97x for Inuvo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Okta, Inc. has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Sprinklr, Inc.'s net margin of 5.8%. Sprinklr, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.76% beat Okta, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.97%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 34.96%. On the other hand Okta, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $112.62 which suggests that it could grow by 30.24%. Given that Sprinklr, Inc. has higher upside potential than Okta, Inc., analysts believe Sprinklr, Inc. is more attractive than Okta, Inc..

Sprinklr, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Okta, Inc. has a beta of 0.759, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.068%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Okta, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprinklr, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Okta, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprinklr, Inc. quarterly revenues are $219.1M, which are smaller than Okta, Inc. quarterly revenues of $742M. Sprinklr, Inc.'s net income of $2.9M is lower than Okta, Inc.'s net income of $43M. Notably, Sprinklr, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.39x while Okta, Inc.'s PE ratio is 79.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr, Inc. is 2.41x versus 5.52x for Okta, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Sprinklr, Inc.'s net margin of 49.4%. Sprinklr, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.76% beat Uber Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 72.7%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 34.96%. On the other hand Uber Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $111.84 which suggests that it could grow by 36.88%. Given that Uber Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sprinklr, Inc., analysts believe Uber Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Sprinklr, Inc..

Sprinklr, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uber Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.513%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uber Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprinklr, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uber Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprinklr, Inc. quarterly revenues are $219.1M, which are smaller than Uber Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.5B. Sprinklr, Inc.'s net income of $2.9M is lower than Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $6.7B. Notably, Sprinklr, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.39x while Uber Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr, Inc. is 2.41x versus 3.51x for Uber Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.