CXM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of 48.72% compared to Sprinklr's net margin of 20.17%. Sprinklr's return on equity of 21.2% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 82.22%.

Sprinklr has a consensus price target of $10.54, signalling upside risk potential of 14.58%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $309.41 which suggests that it could grow by 6.49%. Given that Sprinklr has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Sprinklr is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Sprinklr has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.473%.

Sprinklr has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Sprinklr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sprinklr quarterly revenues are $202.5M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Sprinklr's net income of $98.7M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $963.2M. Notably, Sprinklr's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.00x while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 30.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr is 3.13x versus 6.34x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of 48.72% compared to Sprinklr's net margin of 18.49%. Sprinklr's return on equity of 21.2% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Sprinklr has a consensus price target of $10.54, signalling upside risk potential of 14.58%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $336.79 which suggests that it could grow by 36.39%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Sprinklr, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Sprinklr.

Sprinklr has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.556%.

Sprinklr has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprinklr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprinklr quarterly revenues are $202.5M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Sprinklr's net income of $98.7M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Sprinklr's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.00x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 48.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr is 3.13x versus 8.74x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Agilysys has a net margin of 48.72% compared to Sprinklr's net margin of 5.51%. Sprinklr's return on equity of 21.2% beat Agilysys's return on equity of 8.99%.

Sprinklr has a consensus price target of $10.54, signalling upside risk potential of 14.58%. On the other hand Agilysys has an analysts' consensus of $135.25 which suggests that it could grow by 89.29%. Given that Agilysys has higher upside potential than Sprinklr, analysts believe Agilysys is more attractive than Sprinklr.

Sprinklr has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys has a beta of 0.978, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.249%.

Sprinklr has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprinklr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys pays out 1.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sprinklr quarterly revenues are $202.5M, which are larger than Agilysys quarterly revenues of $69.6M. Sprinklr's net income of $98.7M is higher than Agilysys's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Sprinklr's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.00x while Agilysys's PE ratio is 89.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr is 3.13x versus 7.64x for Agilysys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 48.72% compared to Sprinklr's net margin of 0.54%. Sprinklr's return on equity of 21.2% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

Sprinklr has a consensus price target of $10.54, signalling upside risk potential of 14.58%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.28 which suggests that it could grow by 247.51%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Sprinklr, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Sprinklr.

Sprinklr has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.859, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.144%.

Sprinklr has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprinklr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprinklr quarterly revenues are $202.5M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. Sprinklr's net income of $98.7M is higher than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, Sprinklr's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.00x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr is 3.13x versus 0.61x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.