CXM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has a net margin of 5.95% compared to Sprinklr, Inc.'s net margin of 19.57%. Sprinklr, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.76% beat Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s return on equity of 71.7%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.71, signalling upside risk potential of 37.89%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $293.23 which suggests that it could grow by 12.69%. Given that Sprinklr, Inc. has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, Inc., analysts believe Sprinklr, Inc. is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing, Inc..

Sprinklr, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has a beta of 0.857, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.307%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Sprinklr, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. pays out 60.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sprinklr, Inc. quarterly revenues are $212M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Sprinklr, Inc.'s net income of $12.6M is lower than Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s net income of $1B. Notably, Sprinklr, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.21x while Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr, Inc. is 2.48x versus 5.08x for Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk, Inc. has a net margin of 5.95% compared to Sprinklr, Inc.'s net margin of 18.5%. Sprinklr, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.76% beat Autodesk, Inc.'s return on equity of 41.26%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.71, signalling upside risk potential of 37.89%. On the other hand Autodesk, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $365.14 which suggests that it could grow by 18.85%. Given that Sprinklr, Inc. has higher upside potential than Autodesk, Inc., analysts believe Sprinklr, Inc. is more attractive than Autodesk, Inc..

Sprinklr, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk, Inc. has a beta of 1.471, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.111%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprinklr, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprinklr, Inc. quarterly revenues are $212M, which are smaller than Autodesk, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Sprinklr, Inc.'s net income of $12.6M is lower than Autodesk, Inc.'s net income of $343M. Notably, Sprinklr, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.21x while Autodesk, Inc.'s PE ratio is 59.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr, Inc. is 2.48x versus 9.65x for Autodesk, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Braze, Inc. has a net margin of 5.95% compared to Sprinklr, Inc.'s net margin of -15.41%. Sprinklr, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.76% beat Braze, Inc.'s return on equity of -22.08%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.71, signalling upside risk potential of 37.89%. On the other hand Braze, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $45.11 which suggests that it could grow by 53.54%. Given that Braze, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sprinklr, Inc., analysts believe Braze, Inc. is more attractive than Sprinklr, Inc..

Sprinklr, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Braze, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Braze, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprinklr, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Braze, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprinklr, Inc. quarterly revenues are $212M, which are larger than Braze, Inc. quarterly revenues of $180.1M. Sprinklr, Inc.'s net income of $12.6M is higher than Braze, Inc.'s net income of -$27.8M. Notably, Sprinklr, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.21x while Braze, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr, Inc. is 2.48x versus 4.67x for Braze, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo, Inc. has a net margin of 5.95% compared to Sprinklr, Inc.'s net margin of -7.71%. Sprinklr, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.76% beat Inuvo, Inc.'s return on equity of -35.27%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.71, signalling upside risk potential of 37.89%. On the other hand Inuvo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.88 which suggests that it could grow by 267.4%. Given that Inuvo, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sprinklr, Inc., analysts believe Inuvo, Inc. is more attractive than Sprinklr, Inc..

Sprinklr, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo, Inc. has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.66%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprinklr, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprinklr, Inc. quarterly revenues are $212M, which are larger than Inuvo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22.6M. Sprinklr, Inc.'s net income of $12.6M is higher than Inuvo, Inc.'s net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Sprinklr, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.21x while Inuvo, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr, Inc. is 2.48x versus 2.35x for Inuvo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.