CXM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastly, Inc. has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Sprinklr, Inc.'s net margin of -18.63%. Sprinklr, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.76% beat Fastly, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.57%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 94.81%. On the other hand Fastly, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.57 which suggests that it could grow by 13.55%. Given that Sprinklr, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fastly, Inc., analysts believe Sprinklr, Inc. is more attractive than Fastly, Inc..

Sprinklr, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastly, Inc. has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.454%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fastly, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprinklr, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fastly, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprinklr, Inc. quarterly revenues are $219.1M, which are larger than Fastly, Inc. quarterly revenues of $158.2M. Sprinklr, Inc.'s net income of $2.9M is higher than Fastly, Inc.'s net income of -$29.5M. Notably, Sprinklr, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.74x while Fastly, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr, Inc. is 1.67x versus 2.27x for Fastly, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Okta, Inc. has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Sprinklr, Inc.'s net margin of 5.8%. Sprinklr, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.76% beat Okta, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.97%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 94.81%. On the other hand Okta, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $113.42 which suggests that it could grow by 28.63%. Given that Sprinklr, Inc. has higher upside potential than Okta, Inc., analysts believe Sprinklr, Inc. is more attractive than Okta, Inc..

Sprinklr, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Okta, Inc. has a beta of 0.768, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.227%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Okta, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprinklr, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Okta, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprinklr, Inc. quarterly revenues are $219.1M, which are smaller than Okta, Inc. quarterly revenues of $742M. Sprinklr, Inc.'s net income of $2.9M is lower than Okta, Inc.'s net income of $43M. Notably, Sprinklr, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.74x while Okta, Inc.'s PE ratio is 80.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr, Inc. is 1.67x versus 5.63x for Okta, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PTC, Inc. has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Sprinklr, Inc.'s net margin of 24.28%. Sprinklr, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.76% beat PTC, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.19%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 94.81%. On the other hand PTC, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $196.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.96%. Given that Sprinklr, Inc. has higher upside potential than PTC, Inc., analysts believe Sprinklr, Inc. is more attractive than PTC, Inc..

Sprinklr, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PTC, Inc. has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.438%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PTC, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprinklr, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PTC, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprinklr, Inc. quarterly revenues are $219.1M, which are smaller than PTC, Inc. quarterly revenues of $685.8M. Sprinklr, Inc.'s net income of $2.9M is lower than PTC, Inc.'s net income of $166.5M. Notably, Sprinklr, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.74x while PTC, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr, Inc. is 1.67x versus 6.56x for PTC, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Sprinklr, Inc.'s net margin of 2.21%. Sprinklr, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.76% beat Uber Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.97%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 94.81%. On the other hand Uber Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $105.36 which suggests that it could grow by 48.37%. Given that Sprinklr, Inc. has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Sprinklr, Inc. is more attractive than Uber Technologies, Inc..

Sprinklr, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uber Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.207, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.678%.

Sprinklr, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uber Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprinklr, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uber Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprinklr, Inc. quarterly revenues are $219.1M, which are smaller than Uber Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.4B. Sprinklr, Inc.'s net income of $2.9M is lower than Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $317M. Notably, Sprinklr, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.74x while Uber Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr, Inc. is 1.67x versus 2.89x for Uber Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.