CULP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of -7.9% compared to Culp's net margin of --. Culp's return on equity of -31.34% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Culp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 59.68%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Culp has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Culp is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Culp has a beta of 1.062, which suggesting that the stock is 6.158% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Culp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Culp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Culp quarterly revenues are $52.3M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Culp's net income of -$4.1M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Culp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Culp is 0.29x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a net margin of -7.9% compared to Culp's net margin of 1.54%. Culp's return on equity of -31.34% beat Goodyear Tire & Rubber's return on equity of 1.44%.

Culp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 59.68%. On the other hand Goodyear Tire & Rubber has an analysts' consensus of $11.54 which suggests that it could grow by 27.37%. Given that Culp has higher upside potential than Goodyear Tire & Rubber, analysts believe Culp is more attractive than Goodyear Tire & Rubber.

Culp has a beta of 1.062, which suggesting that the stock is 6.158% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a beta of 1.707, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.69%.

Culp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goodyear Tire & Rubber offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Culp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goodyear Tire & Rubber pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Culp quarterly revenues are $52.3M, which are smaller than Goodyear Tire & Rubber quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Culp's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Goodyear Tire & Rubber's net income of $76M. Notably, Culp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Goodyear Tire & Rubber's PE ratio is 37.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Culp is 0.29x versus 0.14x for Goodyear Tire & Rubber. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MillerKnoll has a net margin of -7.9% compared to Culp's net margin of 3.51%. Culp's return on equity of -31.34% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity of 4.46%.

Culp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 59.68%. On the other hand MillerKnoll has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 66.58%. Given that MillerKnoll has higher upside potential than Culp, analysts believe MillerKnoll is more attractive than Culp.

Culp has a beta of 1.062, which suggesting that the stock is 6.158% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.502%.

Culp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MillerKnoll offers a yield of 3.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Culp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll pays out 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Culp quarterly revenues are $52.3M, which are smaller than MillerKnoll quarterly revenues of $970.4M. Culp's net income of -$4.1M is lower than MillerKnoll's net income of $34.1M. Notably, Culp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MillerKnoll's PE ratio is 20.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Culp is 0.29x versus 0.38x for MillerKnoll. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of -7.9% compared to Culp's net margin of -46.97%. Culp's return on equity of -31.34% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74%.

Culp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 59.68%. On the other hand Yunhong Green CTI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 723.53%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than Culp, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than Culp.

Culp has a beta of 1.062, which suggesting that the stock is 6.158% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.66999999999999%.

Culp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Yunhong Green CTI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Culp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yunhong Green CTI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Culp quarterly revenues are $52.3M, which are larger than Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Culp's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Culp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Yunhong Green CTI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Culp is 0.29x versus 1.01x for Yunhong Green CTI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.