CULP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greenkraft, Inc. has a net margin of -8.09% compared to Culp, Inc.'s net margin of --. Culp, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.37% beat Greenkraft, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Culp, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 123.46%. On the other hand Greenkraft, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Culp, Inc. has higher upside potential than Greenkraft, Inc., analysts believe Culp, Inc. is more attractive than Greenkraft, Inc..

Culp, Inc. has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenkraft, Inc. has a beta of 221.643, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22064.266%.

Culp, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greenkraft, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Culp, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greenkraft, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Culp, Inc. quarterly revenues are $53.2M, which are larger than Greenkraft, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Culp, Inc.'s net income of -$4.3M is higher than Greenkraft, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Culp, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Greenkraft, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Culp, Inc. is 0.22x versus 0.51x for Greenkraft, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors Co. has a net margin of -8.09% compared to Culp, Inc.'s net margin of -7.2%. Culp, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.37% beat General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.19%.

Culp, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 123.46%. On the other hand General Motors Co. has an analysts' consensus of $94.63 which suggests that it could grow by 16.14%. Given that Culp, Inc. has higher upside potential than General Motors Co., analysts believe Culp, Inc. is more attractive than General Motors Co..

Culp, Inc. has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.363, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.25%.

Culp, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors Co. offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Culp, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co. pays out 17.44% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Culp, Inc. quarterly revenues are $53.2M, which are smaller than General Motors Co. quarterly revenues of $45.3B. Culp, Inc.'s net income of -$4.3M is higher than General Motors Co.'s net income of -$3.3B. Notably, Culp, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while General Motors Co.'s PE ratio is 26.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Culp, Inc. is 0.22x versus 0.42x for General Motors Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of -8.09% compared to Culp, Inc.'s net margin of 3.44%. Culp, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.37% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

Culp, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 123.46%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $421.73 which suggests that it could grow by 1.03%. Given that Culp, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Culp, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Culp, Inc. has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.858, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.812%.

Culp, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Culp, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Culp, Inc. quarterly revenues are $53.2M, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9B. Culp, Inc.'s net income of -$4.3M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M. Notably, Culp, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 387.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Culp, Inc. is 0.22x versus 15.52x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group, Inc. has a net margin of -8.09% compared to Culp, Inc.'s net margin of -328.21%. Culp, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.37% beat Workhorse Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -181.65%.

Culp, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 123.46%. On the other hand Workhorse Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $0.65 which suggests that it could grow by 100.51%. Given that Culp, Inc. has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, Inc., analysts believe Culp, Inc. is more attractive than Workhorse Group, Inc..

Culp, Inc. has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 159.346%.

Culp, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workhorse Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Culp, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Culp, Inc. quarterly revenues are $53.2M, which are larger than Workhorse Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Culp, Inc.'s net income of -$4.3M is higher than Workhorse Group, Inc.'s net income of -$7.8M. Notably, Culp, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workhorse Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Culp, Inc. is 0.22x versus 0.23x for Workhorse Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.