CNQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FEC Resources has a net margin of 10.29% compared to Canadian Natural Resources's net margin of --. Canadian Natural Resources's return on equity of 15.35% beat FEC Resources's return on equity of --.

Canadian Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $36.08, signalling upside risk potential of 30.84%. On the other hand FEC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Canadian Natural Resources has higher upside potential than FEC Resources, analysts believe Canadian Natural Resources is more attractive than FEC Resources.

Canadian Natural Resources has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.307% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FEC Resources has a beta of 0.907, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.256%.

Canadian Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.73%. FEC Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Canadian Natural Resources pays 72.54% of its earnings as a dividend. FEC Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Natural Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canadian Natural Resources quarterly revenues are $7.9B, which are larger than FEC Resources quarterly revenues of --. Canadian Natural Resources's net income of $810.7M is higher than FEC Resources's net income of -$57K. Notably, Canadian Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while FEC Resources's PE ratio is 0.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Natural Resources is 1.95x versus -- for FEC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greenfire Resources has a net margin of 10.29% compared to Canadian Natural Resources's net margin of 37.61%. Canadian Natural Resources's return on equity of 15.35% beat Greenfire Resources's return on equity of 16.57%.

Canadian Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $36.08, signalling upside risk potential of 30.84%. On the other hand Greenfire Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Canadian Natural Resources has higher upside potential than Greenfire Resources, analysts believe Canadian Natural Resources is more attractive than Greenfire Resources.

Canadian Natural Resources has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.307% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Canadian Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.73%. Greenfire Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Canadian Natural Resources pays 72.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenfire Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Natural Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canadian Natural Resources quarterly revenues are $7.9B, which are larger than Greenfire Resources quarterly revenues of $148.8M. Canadian Natural Resources's net income of $810.7M is higher than Greenfire Resources's net income of $56M. Notably, Canadian Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Greenfire Resources's PE ratio is 3.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Natural Resources is 1.95x versus 0.56x for Greenfire Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gran Tierra Energy has a net margin of 10.29% compared to Canadian Natural Resources's net margin of -23.23%. Canadian Natural Resources's return on equity of 15.35% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity of 0.79%.

Canadian Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $36.08, signalling upside risk potential of 30.84%. On the other hand Gran Tierra Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 425.55%. Given that Gran Tierra Energy has higher upside potential than Canadian Natural Resources, analysts believe Gran Tierra Energy is more attractive than Canadian Natural Resources.

Canadian Natural Resources has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.307% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 0.886, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.375%.

Canadian Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.73%. Gran Tierra Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Canadian Natural Resources pays 72.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Gran Tierra Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Natural Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canadian Natural Resources quarterly revenues are $7.9B, which are larger than Gran Tierra Energy quarterly revenues of $147.3M. Canadian Natural Resources's net income of $810.7M is higher than Gran Tierra Energy's net income of -$34.2M. Notably, Canadian Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Gran Tierra Energy's PE ratio is 42.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Natural Resources is 1.95x versus 0.21x for Gran Tierra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunshine Oilsands has a net margin of 10.29% compared to Canadian Natural Resources's net margin of -9.69%. Canadian Natural Resources's return on equity of 15.35% beat Sunshine Oilsands's return on equity of -43.12%.

Canadian Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $36.08, signalling upside risk potential of 30.84%. On the other hand Sunshine Oilsands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Canadian Natural Resources has higher upside potential than Sunshine Oilsands, analysts believe Canadian Natural Resources is more attractive than Sunshine Oilsands.

Canadian Natural Resources has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.307% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunshine Oilsands has a beta of -4,188.235, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 418923.48%.

Canadian Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.73%. Sunshine Oilsands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Canadian Natural Resources pays 72.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Sunshine Oilsands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Natural Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canadian Natural Resources quarterly revenues are $7.9B, which are larger than Sunshine Oilsands quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Canadian Natural Resources's net income of $810.7M is higher than Sunshine Oilsands's net income of -$370.1K. Notably, Canadian Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Sunshine Oilsands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Natural Resources is 1.95x versus 0.36x for Sunshine Oilsands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.