CMPO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyperscale Data, Inc. has a net margin of 35.93% compared to CompoSecure, Inc.'s net margin of -55.83%. CompoSecure, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s return on equity of -257.58%.

CompoSecure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $25.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.21%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 188713433.45%. Given that Hyperscale Data, Inc. has higher upside potential than CompoSecure, Inc., analysts believe Hyperscale Data, Inc. is more attractive than CompoSecure, Inc..

CompoSecure, Inc. has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.464% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data, Inc. has a beta of 2.871, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 187.109%.

CompoSecure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyperscale Data, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CompoSecure, Inc. pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data, Inc. pays out 8.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CompoSecure, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hyperscale Data, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.3M. CompoSecure, Inc.'s net income of -$174.7M is lower than Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s net income of -$13.6M. Notably, CompoSecure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.73x while Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CompoSecure, Inc. is 13.33x versus 0.04x for Hyperscale Data, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Flex, Inc. has a net margin of 35.93% compared to CompoSecure, Inc.'s net margin of 14.98%. CompoSecure, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Omega Flex, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.08%.

CompoSecure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $25.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.21%. On the other hand Omega Flex, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CompoSecure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, Inc., analysts believe CompoSecure, Inc. is more attractive than Omega Flex, Inc..

CompoSecure, Inc. has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.464% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex, Inc. has a beta of 0.397, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.264%.

CompoSecure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Omega Flex, Inc. offers a yield of 4.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. CompoSecure, Inc. pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex, Inc. pays out 75.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CompoSecure, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Omega Flex, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.2M. CompoSecure, Inc.'s net income of -$174.7M is lower than Omega Flex, Inc.'s net income of $3.6M. Notably, CompoSecure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.73x while Omega Flex, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CompoSecure, Inc. is 13.33x versus 2.80x for Omega Flex, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a net margin of 35.93% compared to CompoSecure, Inc.'s net margin of 1.54%. CompoSecure, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.7%.

CompoSecure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $25.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.21%. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 9.49%. Given that CompoSecure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., analysts believe CompoSecure, Inc. is more attractive than Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc..

CompoSecure, Inc. has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.464% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.907%.

CompoSecure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 4.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. CompoSecure, Inc. pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. pays out 174.03% of its earnings as a dividend. CompoSecure, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s is not.

CompoSecure, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $124.7M. CompoSecure, Inc.'s net income of -$174.7M is lower than Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M. Notably, CompoSecure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.73x while Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 49.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CompoSecure, Inc. is 13.33x versus 1.05x for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toughbuilt Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 35.93% compared to CompoSecure, Inc.'s net margin of --. CompoSecure, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Toughbuilt Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

CompoSecure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $25.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.21%. On the other hand Toughbuilt Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1181719.36%. Given that Toughbuilt Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than CompoSecure, Inc., analysts believe Toughbuilt Industries, Inc. is more attractive than CompoSecure, Inc..

CompoSecure, Inc. has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.464% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toughbuilt Industries, Inc. has a beta of -2.274, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 327.402%.

CompoSecure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Toughbuilt Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CompoSecure, Inc. pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Toughbuilt Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CompoSecure, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CompoSecure, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Toughbuilt Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. CompoSecure, Inc.'s net income of -$174.7M is higher than Toughbuilt Industries, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, CompoSecure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.73x while Toughbuilt Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CompoSecure, Inc. is 13.33x versus 0.00x for Toughbuilt Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.