SWBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Beliss Corp. has a net margin of 1.54% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -646.04%. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat Beliss Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 28.08%. On the other hand Beliss Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Beliss Corp., analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Beliss Corp..

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 6.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beliss Corp. has a beta of 3.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 252.858%.

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.93%. Beliss Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. pays 174.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Beliss Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $124.7M, which are larger than Beliss Corp. quarterly revenues of $67.5K. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M is higher than Beliss Corp.'s net income of -$639.2K. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.50x while Beliss Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. is 1.01x versus -- for Beliss Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyperscale Data, Inc. has a net margin of 1.54% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -55.83%. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s return on equity of -257.58%.

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 28.08%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 196115346.42%. Given that Hyperscale Data, Inc. has higher upside potential than Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., analysts believe Hyperscale Data, Inc. is more attractive than Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc..

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 6.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data, Inc. has a beta of 2.927, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 192.701%.

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.93%. Hyperscale Data, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. pays 174.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data, Inc. pays out 8.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s is not.

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $124.7M, which are larger than Hyperscale Data, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.3M. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M is higher than Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s net income of -$13.6M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.50x while Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. is 1.01x versus 0.04x for Hyperscale Data, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Flex, Inc. has a net margin of 1.54% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 14.98%. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat Omega Flex, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.08%.

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 28.08%. On the other hand Omega Flex, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, Inc., analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Omega Flex, Inc..

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 6.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex, Inc. has a beta of 0.374, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.607%.

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.93%. Omega Flex, Inc. offers a yield of 4.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. pays 174.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex, Inc. pays out 75.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s is not.

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $124.7M, which are larger than Omega Flex, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.2M. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M is lower than Omega Flex, Inc.'s net income of $3.6M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.50x while Omega Flex, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. is 1.01x versus 3.41x for Omega Flex, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. has a net margin of 1.54% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 1.25%. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 0.85%.

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 28.08%. On the other hand Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $44.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.83%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc., analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc..

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 6.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.207, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.338%.

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.93%. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. pays 174.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. pays out 38.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s is not.

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $124.7M, which are smaller than Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $126.8M. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M is higher than Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.'s net income of $1.6M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.50x while Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 289.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. is 1.01x versus 1.15x for Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.