SWBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NAPC Defense has a net margin of 1.44% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of -646.04%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 7.9% beat NAPC Defense's return on equity of --.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of $13.83, signalling upside risk potential of 45.16%. On the other hand NAPC Defense has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than NAPC Defense, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than NAPC Defense.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.14% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NAPC Defense has a beta of 3.531, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 253.092%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.46%. NAPC Defense offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. NAPC Defense pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $115.9M, which are larger than NAPC Defense quarterly revenues of $67.5K. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $1.7M is higher than NAPC Defense's net income of -$435.9K. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.66x while NAPC Defense's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.87x versus -- for NAPC Defense. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 1.44% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of -82.25%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 7.9% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of $13.83, signalling upside risk potential of 45.16%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21874943.75%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Smith & Wesson Brands, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Smith & Wesson Brands.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.14% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.549, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 254.891%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.46%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -0.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $115.9M, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $1.7M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.66x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.87x versus 0.01x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 1.44% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of 17.36%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 7.9% beat Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.26%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of $13.83, signalling upside risk potential of 45.16%. On the other hand Omega Flex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.14% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex has a beta of 0.263, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.726%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.46%. Omega Flex offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $115.9M, which are larger than Omega Flex quarterly revenues of $27M. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $1.7M is lower than Omega Flex's net income of $4.7M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.66x while Omega Flex's PE ratio is 20.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.87x versus 3.67x for Omega Flex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sturm Ruger & has a net margin of 1.44% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of 7.19%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 7.9% beat Sturm Ruger &'s return on equity of 9.44%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of $13.83, signalling upside risk potential of 45.16%. On the other hand Sturm Ruger & has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.78%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than Sturm Ruger &, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than Sturm Ruger &.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.14% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sturm Ruger & has a beta of 0.145, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.537%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.46%. Sturm Ruger & offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Sturm Ruger & pays out 38.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $115.9M, which are smaller than Sturm Ruger & quarterly revenues of $145.8M. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $1.7M is lower than Sturm Ruger &'s net income of $10.5M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.66x while Sturm Ruger &'s PE ratio is 22.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.87x versus 1.27x for Sturm Ruger &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.