ESAB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 10.14% compared to ESAB's net margin of -82.25%. ESAB's return on equity of 15.38% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

ESAB has a consensus price target of $115.11, signalling upside risk potential of 9.11%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9905767.09%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than ESAB, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than ESAB.

ESAB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 247.194%.

ESAB has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ESAB pays 6.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -0.6% of its earnings as a dividend. ESAB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ESAB quarterly revenues are $673.3M, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. ESAB's net income of $68.2M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, ESAB's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.72x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESAB is 2.70x versus 0.03x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 10.14% compared to ESAB's net margin of 18.56%. ESAB's return on equity of 15.38% beat Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.86%.

ESAB has a consensus price target of $115.11, signalling upside risk potential of 9.11%. On the other hand Omega Flex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ESAB has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe ESAB is more attractive than Omega Flex.

ESAB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex has a beta of 0.375, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.492%.

ESAB has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. Omega Flex offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. ESAB pays 6.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 63.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ESAB quarterly revenues are $673.3M, which are larger than Omega Flex quarterly revenues of $24.9M. ESAB's net income of $68.2M is higher than Omega Flex's net income of $4.6M. Notably, ESAB's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.72x while Omega Flex's PE ratio is 23.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESAB is 2.70x versus 4.18x for Omega Flex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a net margin of 10.14% compared to ESAB's net margin of 3.19%. ESAB's return on equity of 15.38% beat Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 9.5%.

ESAB has a consensus price target of $115.11, signalling upside risk potential of 9.11%. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 53.8%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than ESAB, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than ESAB.

ESAB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 0.974, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.632%.

ESAB has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. Smith & Wesson Brands offers a yield of 5.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. ESAB pays 6.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands pays out 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ESAB quarterly revenues are $673.3M, which are larger than Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues of $129.7M. ESAB's net income of $68.2M is higher than Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $4.1M. Notably, ESAB's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.72x while Smith & Wesson Brands's PE ratio is 12.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESAB is 2.70x versus 0.88x for Smith & Wesson Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ToughBuilt Industries has a net margin of 10.14% compared to ESAB's net margin of --. ESAB's return on equity of 15.38% beat ToughBuilt Industries's return on equity of --.

ESAB has a consensus price target of $115.11, signalling upside risk potential of 9.11%. On the other hand ToughBuilt Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4787.22%. Given that ToughBuilt Industries has higher upside potential than ESAB, analysts believe ToughBuilt Industries is more attractive than ESAB.

ESAB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ToughBuilt Industries has a beta of 2.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.74%.

ESAB has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. ToughBuilt Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ESAB pays 6.5% of its earnings as a dividend. ToughBuilt Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESAB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ESAB quarterly revenues are $673.3M, which are larger than ToughBuilt Industries quarterly revenues of --. ESAB's net income of $68.2M is higher than ToughBuilt Industries's net income of --. Notably, ESAB's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.72x while ToughBuilt Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESAB is 2.70x versus 0.01x for ToughBuilt Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.