Financhill
Sell
20

CC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$11.28
Seasonality move :
6.31%
Day range:
$10.45 - $11.35
52-week range:
$9.33 - $29.21
Dividend yield:
8.87%
P/E ratio:
20.14x
P/S ratio:
0.29x
P/B ratio:
2.79x
Volume:
2.3M
Avg. volume:
4M
1-year change:
-58.68%
Market cap:
$1.7B
Revenue:
$5.8B
EPS (TTM):
$0.56

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CC
The Chemours
$1.6B $0.57 0.26% -37.88% $19.90
HUN
Huntsman
$1.6B $0.09 2.75% -65.45% $18.77
KWR
Quaker Houghton
$465M $2.05 0.31% 5.46% $167.50
MTX
Minerals Technologies
$554.7M $1.70 -6.4% -9.55% $101.00
NGVT
Ingevity
$385.4M $1.30 -12.24% 27.9% $49.75
RYAM
Rayonier Advanced Materials
$417.1M -$0.06 -3.06% -333.35% $11.00
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CC
The Chemours
$11.28 $19.90 $1.7B 20.14x $0.25 8.87% 0.29x
HUN
Huntsman
$13.65 $18.77 $2.4B -- $0.25 7.33% 0.39x
KWR
Quaker Houghton
$105.88 $167.50 $1.9B 16.29x $0.49 1.78% 1.03x
MTX
Minerals Technologies
$56.28 $101.00 $1.8B 10.84x $0.11 0.75% 0.86x
NGVT
Ingevity
$31.96 $49.75 $1.2B -- $0.00 0% 0.83x
RYAM
Rayonier Advanced Materials
$4.68 $11.00 $312.4M -- $0.00 0% 0.19x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CC
The Chemours
87.18% 1.681 162.61% 0.82x
HUN
Huntsman
38.28% 0.276 55.48% 0.68x
KWR
Quaker Houghton
34.32% 1.049 28.76% 1.55x
MTX
Minerals Technologies
35.73% 1.524 39.37% 1.82x
NGVT
Ingevity
87.77% 0.955 94.58% 0.91x
RYAM
Rayonier Advanced Materials
50.55% 4.344 131.56% 0.85x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CC
The Chemours
$273M $75M 1.84% 12.49% 5.45% $29M
HUN
Huntsman
$188M -$56M -3.62% -5.65% -4.27% $102M
KWR
Quaker Houghton
$156.2M $30.7M 5.46% 8.36% 6.32% $40.6M
MTX
Minerals Technologies
$132.7M $74.2M 6.16% 9.71% 15.83% $42.3M
NGVT
Ingevity
$101.9M $55.2M -23.24% -113.59% 11.48% $39.6M
RYAM
Rayonier Advanced Materials
$36.9M $7.3M -2.59% -5.27% 1.04% $26.6M

The Chemours vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CC or HUN?

    Huntsman has a net margin of -0.57% compared to The Chemours's net margin of -9.71%. The Chemours's return on equity of 12.49% beat Huntsman's return on equity of -5.65%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CC
    The Chemours
    19.58% -$0.06 $4.7B
    HUN
    Huntsman
    12.95% -$0.82 $5B
  • What do Analysts Say About CC or HUN?

    The Chemours has a consensus price target of $19.90, signalling upside risk potential of 76.42%. On the other hand Huntsman has an analysts' consensus of $18.77 which suggests that it could grow by 37.5%. Given that The Chemours has higher upside potential than Huntsman, analysts believe The Chemours is more attractive than Huntsman.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CC
    The Chemours
    3 5 0
    HUN
    Huntsman
    3 10 0
  • Is CC or HUN More Risky?

    The Chemours has a beta of 1.839, which suggesting that the stock is 83.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntsman has a beta of 0.850, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.034%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CC or HUN?

    The Chemours has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.87%. Huntsman offers a yield of 7.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. The Chemours pays 172.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntsman pays out -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CC or HUN?

    The Chemours quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Huntsman quarterly revenues of $1.5B. The Chemours's net income of -$8M is higher than Huntsman's net income of -$141M. Notably, The Chemours's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.14x while Huntsman's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Chemours is 0.29x versus 0.39x for Huntsman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CC
    The Chemours
    0.29x 20.14x $1.4B -$8M
    HUN
    Huntsman
    0.39x -- $1.5B -$141M
  • Which has Higher Returns CC or KWR?

    Quaker Houghton has a net margin of -0.57% compared to The Chemours's net margin of 3.19%. The Chemours's return on equity of 12.49% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 8.36%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CC
    The Chemours
    19.58% -$0.06 $4.7B
    KWR
    Quaker Houghton
    35.17% $0.80 $2.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About CC or KWR?

    The Chemours has a consensus price target of $19.90, signalling upside risk potential of 76.42%. On the other hand Quaker Houghton has an analysts' consensus of $167.50 which suggests that it could grow by 55.05%. Given that The Chemours has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe The Chemours is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CC
    The Chemours
    3 5 0
    KWR
    Quaker Houghton
    2 2 0
  • Is CC or KWR More Risky?

    The Chemours has a beta of 1.839, which suggesting that the stock is 83.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.438, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.848%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CC or KWR?

    The Chemours has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.87%. Quaker Houghton offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. The Chemours pays 172.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 28.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Chemours's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CC or KWR?

    The Chemours quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues of $444.1M. The Chemours's net income of -$8M is lower than Quaker Houghton's net income of $14.2M. Notably, The Chemours's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.14x while Quaker Houghton's PE ratio is 16.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Chemours is 0.29x versus 1.03x for Quaker Houghton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CC
    The Chemours
    0.29x 20.14x $1.4B -$8M
    KWR
    Quaker Houghton
    1.03x 16.29x $444.1M $14.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns CC or MTX?

    Minerals Technologies has a net margin of -0.57% compared to The Chemours's net margin of 10.42%. The Chemours's return on equity of 12.49% beat Minerals Technologies's return on equity of 9.71%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CC
    The Chemours
    19.58% -$0.06 $4.7B
    MTX
    Minerals Technologies
    25.61% $1.69 $2.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About CC or MTX?

    The Chemours has a consensus price target of $19.90, signalling upside risk potential of 76.42%. On the other hand Minerals Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $101.00 which suggests that it could grow by 79.46%. Given that Minerals Technologies has higher upside potential than The Chemours, analysts believe Minerals Technologies is more attractive than The Chemours.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CC
    The Chemours
    3 5 0
    MTX
    Minerals Technologies
    2 0 0
  • Is CC or MTX More Risky?

    The Chemours has a beta of 1.839, which suggesting that the stock is 83.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.905%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CC or MTX?

    The Chemours has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.87%. Minerals Technologies offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. The Chemours pays 172.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out 7.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Chemours's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CC or MTX?

    The Chemours quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Minerals Technologies quarterly revenues of $518.1M. The Chemours's net income of -$8M is lower than Minerals Technologies's net income of $54M. Notably, The Chemours's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.14x while Minerals Technologies's PE ratio is 10.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Chemours is 0.29x versus 0.86x for Minerals Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CC
    The Chemours
    0.29x 20.14x $1.4B -$8M
    MTX
    Minerals Technologies
    0.86x 10.84x $518.1M $54M
  • Which has Higher Returns CC or NGVT?

    Ingevity has a net margin of -0.57% compared to The Chemours's net margin of 5.56%. The Chemours's return on equity of 12.49% beat Ingevity's return on equity of -113.59%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CC
    The Chemours
    19.58% -$0.06 $4.7B
    NGVT
    Ingevity
    34.1% $0.46 $1.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About CC or NGVT?

    The Chemours has a consensus price target of $19.90, signalling upside risk potential of 76.42%. On the other hand Ingevity has an analysts' consensus of $49.75 which suggests that it could grow by 55.66%. Given that The Chemours has higher upside potential than Ingevity, analysts believe The Chemours is more attractive than Ingevity.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CC
    The Chemours
    3 5 0
    NGVT
    Ingevity
    1 1 0
  • Is CC or NGVT More Risky?

    The Chemours has a beta of 1.839, which suggesting that the stock is 83.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingevity has a beta of 1.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.443%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CC or NGVT?

    The Chemours has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.87%. Ingevity offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Chemours pays 172.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingevity pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CC or NGVT?

    The Chemours quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Ingevity quarterly revenues of $298.8M. The Chemours's net income of -$8M is lower than Ingevity's net income of $16.6M. Notably, The Chemours's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.14x while Ingevity's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Chemours is 0.29x versus 0.83x for Ingevity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CC
    The Chemours
    0.29x 20.14x $1.4B -$8M
    NGVT
    Ingevity
    0.83x -- $298.8M $16.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns CC or RYAM?

    Rayonier Advanced Materials has a net margin of -0.57% compared to The Chemours's net margin of -3.84%. The Chemours's return on equity of 12.49% beat Rayonier Advanced Materials's return on equity of -5.27%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CC
    The Chemours
    19.58% -$0.06 $4.7B
    RYAM
    Rayonier Advanced Materials
    8.74% -$0.25 $1.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About CC or RYAM?

    The Chemours has a consensus price target of $19.90, signalling upside risk potential of 76.42%. On the other hand Rayonier Advanced Materials has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 135.04%. Given that Rayonier Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than The Chemours, analysts believe Rayonier Advanced Materials is more attractive than The Chemours.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CC
    The Chemours
    3 5 0
    RYAM
    Rayonier Advanced Materials
    0 0 0
  • Is CC or RYAM More Risky?

    The Chemours has a beta of 1.839, which suggesting that the stock is 83.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rayonier Advanced Materials has a beta of 2.861, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 186.088%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CC or RYAM?

    The Chemours has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.87%. Rayonier Advanced Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Chemours pays 172.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Rayonier Advanced Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CC or RYAM?

    The Chemours quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Rayonier Advanced Materials quarterly revenues of $422.5M. The Chemours's net income of -$8M is higher than Rayonier Advanced Materials's net income of -$16.2M. Notably, The Chemours's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.14x while Rayonier Advanced Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Chemours is 0.29x versus 0.19x for Rayonier Advanced Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CC
    The Chemours
    0.29x 20.14x $1.4B -$8M
    RYAM
    Rayonier Advanced Materials
    0.19x -- $422.5M -$16.2M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will JP Morgan’s AI Advisor Be a Winner?
Will JP Morgan’s AI Advisor Be a Winner?

JPMorgan Chase is rolling out “JPM WealthAI for high-net-worth clients.…

Is Revolve Group Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Is Revolve Group Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?

Recently, Revolve Group (NYSE:RVLV) management delivered some fairly positive business…

Is Bloom Energy Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Is Bloom Energy Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?

While already interesting as the world moves toward greener energy…

Stock Ideas

Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Alerts

Buy
52
RGC alert for Apr 12

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 29.14% over the past day.

Buy
52
SLP alert for Apr 12

Simulations Plus [SLP] is up 26.73% over the past day.

Buy
89
GDXU alert for Apr 12

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 15.9% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock