BOC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a net margin of -15.16% compared to Boston Omaha Corp.'s net margin of -5.78%. Boston Omaha Corp.'s return on equity of -0.26% beat Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.63%.

Boston Omaha Corp. has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.3%. On the other hand Harte-Hanks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 438.46%. Given that Harte-Hanks, Inc. has higher upside potential than Boston Omaha Corp., analysts believe Harte-Hanks, Inc. is more attractive than Boston Omaha Corp..

Boston Omaha Corp. has a beta of 0.697, which suggesting that the stock is 30.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a beta of -0.170, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.954%.

Boston Omaha Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harte-Hanks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boston Omaha Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harte-Hanks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boston Omaha Corp. quarterly revenues are $28.7M, which are smaller than Harte-Hanks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39.5M. Boston Omaha Corp.'s net income of -$4.4M is lower than Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Boston Omaha Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 467.89x while Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boston Omaha Corp. is 3.76x versus 0.14x for Harte-Hanks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matthews International Corp. has a net margin of -15.16% compared to Boston Omaha Corp.'s net margin of -8.62%. Boston Omaha Corp.'s return on equity of -0.26% beat Matthews International Corp.'s return on equity of -5.43%.

Boston Omaha Corp. has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.3%. On the other hand Matthews International Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $37.00 which suggests that it could grow by 51.02%. Given that Matthews International Corp. has higher upside potential than Boston Omaha Corp., analysts believe Matthews International Corp. is more attractive than Boston Omaha Corp..

Boston Omaha Corp. has a beta of 0.697, which suggesting that the stock is 30.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matthews International Corp. has a beta of 1.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.406%.

Boston Omaha Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matthews International Corp. offers a yield of 4.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Boston Omaha Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp. pays out 52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boston Omaha Corp. quarterly revenues are $28.7M, which are smaller than Matthews International Corp. quarterly revenues of $318.8M. Boston Omaha Corp.'s net income of -$4.4M is higher than Matthews International Corp.'s net income of -$27.5M. Notably, Boston Omaha Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 467.89x while Matthews International Corp.'s PE ratio is 30.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boston Omaha Corp. is 3.76x versus 0.51x for Matthews International Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -15.16% compared to Boston Omaha Corp.'s net margin of -443.46%. Boston Omaha Corp.'s return on equity of -0.26% beat Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -83.99%.

Boston Omaha Corp. has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.3%. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Boston Omaha Corp. has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings Corp., analysts believe Boston Omaha Corp. is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings Corp..

Boston Omaha Corp. has a beta of 0.697, which suggesting that the stock is 30.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.432%.

Boston Omaha Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Green Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boston Omaha Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boston Omaha Corp. quarterly revenues are $28.7M, which are larger than Planet Green Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $771.6K. Boston Omaha Corp.'s net income of -$4.4M is lower than Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Boston Omaha Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 467.89x while Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boston Omaha Corp. is 3.76x versus 4.05x for Planet Green Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard Corp. has a net margin of -15.16% compared to Boston Omaha Corp.'s net margin of 4.33%. Boston Omaha Corp.'s return on equity of -0.26% beat Seaboard Corp.'s return on equity of 8.41%.

Boston Omaha Corp. has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.3%. On the other hand Seaboard Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Boston Omaha Corp. has higher upside potential than Seaboard Corp., analysts believe Boston Omaha Corp. is more attractive than Seaboard Corp..

Boston Omaha Corp. has a beta of 0.697, which suggesting that the stock is 30.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard Corp. has a beta of 0.336, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.446%.

Boston Omaha Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seaboard Corp. offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Boston Omaha Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard Corp. pays out 9.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boston Omaha Corp. quarterly revenues are $28.7M, which are smaller than Seaboard Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Boston Omaha Corp.'s net income of -$4.4M is lower than Seaboard Corp.'s net income of $110M. Notably, Boston Omaha Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 467.89x while Seaboard Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boston Omaha Corp. is 3.76x versus 0.43x for Seaboard Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.