BGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Mills, Inc. has a net margin of -4.36% compared to B&G Foods, Inc.'s net margin of 26.65%. B&G Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of -45.29% beat General Mills, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.01%.

B&G Foods, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.10, signalling downside risk potential of -9.49%. On the other hand General Mills, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $53.37 which suggests that it could grow by 16.07%. Given that General Mills, Inc. has higher upside potential than B&G Foods, Inc., analysts believe General Mills, Inc. is more attractive than B&G Foods, Inc..

B&G Foods, Inc. has a beta of 0.401, which suggesting that the stock is 59.927% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills, Inc. has a beta of -0.073, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.319%.

B&G Foods, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.78%. General Mills, Inc. offers a yield of 5.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. B&G Foods, Inc. pays 23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills, Inc. pays out 58.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

B&G Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues are $439.3M, which are smaller than General Mills, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.5B. B&G Foods, Inc.'s net income of -$19.1M is lower than General Mills, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, B&G Foods, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while General Mills, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods, Inc. is 0.20x versus 1.33x for General Mills, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -4.36% compared to B&G Foods, Inc.'s net margin of 3.88%. B&G Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of -45.29% beat Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.04%.

B&G Foods, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.10, signalling downside risk potential of -9.49%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $66.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.44%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than B&G Foods, Inc., analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than B&G Foods, Inc..

B&G Foods, Inc. has a beta of 0.401, which suggesting that the stock is 59.927% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.026%.

B&G Foods, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.78%. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. B&G Foods, Inc. pays 23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. pays out 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

B&G Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues are $439.3M, which are smaller than Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. B&G Foods, Inc.'s net income of -$19.1M is lower than Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $64.3M. Notably, B&G Foods, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods, Inc. is 0.20x versus 1.31x for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seneca Foods Corp. has a net margin of -4.36% compared to B&G Foods, Inc.'s net margin of 6.46%. B&G Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of -45.29% beat Seneca Foods Corp.'s return on equity of 9.46%.

B&G Foods, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.10, signalling downside risk potential of -9.49%. On the other hand Seneca Foods Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that B&G Foods, Inc. has higher upside potential than Seneca Foods Corp., analysts believe B&G Foods, Inc. is more attractive than Seneca Foods Corp..

B&G Foods, Inc. has a beta of 0.401, which suggesting that the stock is 59.927% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seneca Foods Corp. has a beta of 0.103, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.717%.

B&G Foods, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.78%. Seneca Foods Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. B&G Foods, Inc. pays 23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Seneca Foods Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. B&G Foods, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

B&G Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues are $439.3M, which are smaller than Seneca Foods Corp. quarterly revenues of $460M. B&G Foods, Inc.'s net income of -$19.1M is lower than Seneca Foods Corp.'s net income of $29.7M. Notably, B&G Foods, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seneca Foods Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods, Inc. is 0.20x versus 0.50x for Seneca Foods Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The J. M. Smucker Co. has a net margin of -4.36% compared to B&G Foods, Inc.'s net margin of 10.36%. B&G Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of -45.29% beat The J. M. Smucker Co.'s return on equity of -18.31%.

B&G Foods, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.10, signalling downside risk potential of -9.49%. On the other hand The J. M. Smucker Co. has an analysts' consensus of $116.13 which suggests that it could grow by 16.59%. Given that The J. M. Smucker Co. has higher upside potential than B&G Foods, Inc., analysts believe The J. M. Smucker Co. is more attractive than B&G Foods, Inc..

B&G Foods, Inc. has a beta of 0.401, which suggesting that the stock is 59.927% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The J. M. Smucker Co. has a beta of 0.219, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.145%.

B&G Foods, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.78%. The J. M. Smucker Co. offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. B&G Foods, Inc. pays 23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. The J. M. Smucker Co. pays out 37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

B&G Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues are $439.3M, which are smaller than The J. M. Smucker Co. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. B&G Foods, Inc.'s net income of -$19.1M is lower than The J. M. Smucker Co.'s net income of $241.3M. Notably, B&G Foods, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The J. M. Smucker Co.'s PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods, Inc. is 0.20x versus 1.21x for The J. M. Smucker Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.