SENEA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

B&G Foods has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Seneca Foods's net margin of 1.62%. Seneca Foods's return on equity of 7.02% beat B&G Foods's return on equity of -3.3%.

Seneca Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand B&G Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.99%. Given that B&G Foods has higher upside potential than Seneca Foods, analysts believe B&G Foods is more attractive than Seneca Foods.

Seneca Foods has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 71.018% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison B&G Foods has a beta of 0.537, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.269%.

Seneca Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. B&G Foods offers a yield of 10.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Seneca Foods pays 0.04% of its earnings as a dividend. B&G Foods pays out -84.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Seneca Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seneca Foods quarterly revenues are $425.5M, which are smaller than B&G Foods quarterly revenues of $461.1M. Seneca Foods's net income of $13.3M is higher than B&G Foods's net income of $7.5M. Notably, Seneca Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.88x while B&G Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seneca Foods is 0.37x versus 0.29x for B&G Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Seneca Foods's net margin of --. Seneca Foods's return on equity of 7.02% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Seneca Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Seneca Foods has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Seneca Foods is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Seneca Foods has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 71.018% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of 0.010, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.048%.

Seneca Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seneca Foods pays 0.04% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seneca Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seneca Foods quarterly revenues are $425.5M, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Seneca Foods's net income of $13.3M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Seneca Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.88x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seneca Foods is 0.37x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JM Smucker has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Seneca Foods's net margin of -1.08%. Seneca Foods's return on equity of 7.02% beat JM Smucker's return on equity of 6.97%.

Seneca Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JM Smucker has an analysts' consensus of $127.49 which suggests that it could grow by 15.81%. Given that JM Smucker has higher upside potential than Seneca Foods, analysts believe JM Smucker is more attractive than Seneca Foods.

Seneca Foods has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 71.018% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JM Smucker has a beta of 0.263, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.674%.

Seneca Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JM Smucker offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. Seneca Foods pays 0.04% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker pays out 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seneca Foods quarterly revenues are $425.5M, which are smaller than JM Smucker quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Seneca Foods's net income of $13.3M is higher than JM Smucker's net income of -$24.5M. Notably, Seneca Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.88x while JM Smucker's PE ratio is 22.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seneca Foods is 0.37x versus 1.33x for JM Smucker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Seneca Foods's net margin of 3.7%. Seneca Foods's return on equity of 7.02% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Seneca Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.76%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Seneca Foods, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Seneca Foods.

Seneca Foods has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 71.018% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.272%.

Seneca Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Seneca Foods pays 0.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seneca Foods quarterly revenues are $425.5M, which are smaller than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $773.7M. Seneca Foods's net income of $13.3M is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M. Notably, Seneca Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.88x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 20.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seneca Foods is 0.37x versus 0.88x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.