AOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aura Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 13.74% compared to A. O. Smith Corp.'s net margin of -1535.68%. A. O. Smith Corp.'s return on equity of 29.41% beat Aura Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

A. O. Smith Corp. has a consensus price target of $79.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.7%. On the other hand Aura Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that A. O. Smith Corp. has higher upside potential than Aura Systems, Inc., analysts believe A. O. Smith Corp. is more attractive than Aura Systems, Inc..

A. O. Smith Corp. has a beta of 1.358, which suggesting that the stock is 35.765% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aura Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.458, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.153%.

A. O. Smith Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Aura Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A. O. Smith Corp. pays 35.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Aura Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A. O. Smith Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A. O. Smith Corp. quarterly revenues are $912.5M, which are larger than Aura Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $80K. A. O. Smith Corp.'s net income of $125.4M is higher than Aura Systems, Inc.'s net income of $5.5M. Notably, A. O. Smith Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.23x while Aura Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A. O. Smith Corp. is 2.88x versus 60.53x for Aura Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has a net margin of 13.74% compared to A. O. Smith Corp.'s net margin of 7.8%. A. O. Smith Corp.'s return on equity of 29.41% beat Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 11.43%.

A. O. Smith Corp. has a consensus price target of $79.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.7%. On the other hand Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $111.75 which suggests that it could grow by 16.6%. Given that Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than A. O. Smith Corp., analysts believe Franklin Electric Co., Inc. is more attractive than A. O. Smith Corp..

A. O. Smith Corp. has a beta of 1.358, which suggesting that the stock is 35.765% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.984%.

A. O. Smith Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Franklin Electric Co., Inc. offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. A. O. Smith Corp. pays 35.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric Co., Inc. pays out 32.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A. O. Smith Corp. quarterly revenues are $912.5M, which are larger than Franklin Electric Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $506.9M. A. O. Smith Corp.'s net income of $125.4M is higher than Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s net income of $39.6M. Notably, A. O. Smith Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.23x while Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A. O. Smith Corp. is 2.88x versus 2.05x for Franklin Electric Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Generac Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 13.74% compared to A. O. Smith Corp.'s net margin of -2.19%. A. O. Smith Corp.'s return on equity of 29.41% beat Generac Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.29%.

A. O. Smith Corp. has a consensus price target of $79.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.7%. On the other hand Generac Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $237.76 which suggests that it could grow by 3.74%. Given that Generac Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than A. O. Smith Corp., analysts believe Generac Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than A. O. Smith Corp..

A. O. Smith Corp. has a beta of 1.358, which suggesting that the stock is 35.765% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Generac Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.853, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.279%.

A. O. Smith Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Generac Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A. O. Smith Corp. pays 35.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Generac Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A. O. Smith Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A. O. Smith Corp. quarterly revenues are $912.5M, which are smaller than Generac Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. A. O. Smith Corp.'s net income of $125.4M is higher than Generac Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$23.9M. Notably, A. O. Smith Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.23x while Generac Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 85.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A. O. Smith Corp. is 2.88x versus 3.22x for Generac Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regal Rexnord Corp. has a net margin of 13.74% compared to A. O. Smith Corp.'s net margin of 4.19%. A. O. Smith Corp.'s return on equity of 29.41% beat Regal Rexnord Corp.'s return on equity of 4.25%.

A. O. Smith Corp. has a consensus price target of $79.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.7%. On the other hand Regal Rexnord Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $232.36 which suggests that it could grow by 7.9%. Given that Regal Rexnord Corp. has higher upside potential than A. O. Smith Corp., analysts believe Regal Rexnord Corp. is more attractive than A. O. Smith Corp..

A. O. Smith Corp. has a beta of 1.358, which suggesting that the stock is 35.765% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regal Rexnord Corp. has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.988%.

A. O. Smith Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Regal Rexnord Corp. offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. A. O. Smith Corp. pays 35.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord Corp. pays out 33.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A. O. Smith Corp. quarterly revenues are $912.5M, which are smaller than Regal Rexnord Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. A. O. Smith Corp.'s net income of $125.4M is higher than Regal Rexnord Corp.'s net income of $63.8M. Notably, A. O. Smith Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.23x while Regal Rexnord Corp.'s PE ratio is 51.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A. O. Smith Corp. is 2.88x versus 2.42x for Regal Rexnord Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.