FELE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aura Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 2.94% compared to Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s net margin of -1535.68%. Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 11.1% beat Aura Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $109.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.91%. On the other hand Aura Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Aura Systems, Inc., analysts believe Franklin Electric Co., Inc. is more attractive than Aura Systems, Inc..

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has a beta of 1.074, which suggesting that the stock is 7.351% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aura Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.345, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.511%.

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Aura Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Electric Co., Inc. pays 25.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Aura Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $581.7M, which are larger than Aura Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s net income of $17.1M is higher than Aura Systems, Inc.'s net income of -$4.8M. Notably, Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.46x while Aura Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Electric Co., Inc. is 2.16x versus 44.90x for Aura Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Generac Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 2.94% compared to Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s net margin of 5.98%. Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 11.1% beat Generac Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.02%.

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $109.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.91%. On the other hand Generac Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $206.53 which suggests that it could grow by 46.67%. Given that Generac Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Franklin Electric Co., Inc., analysts believe Generac Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Franklin Electric Co., Inc..

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has a beta of 1.074, which suggesting that the stock is 7.351% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Generac Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.816, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.615%.

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Generac Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Electric Co., Inc. pays 25.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Generac Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $581.7M, which are smaller than Generac Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s net income of $17.1M is lower than Generac Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $66.6M. Notably, Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.46x while Generac Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Electric Co., Inc. is 2.16x versus 1.92x for Generac Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Powell Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 2.94% compared to Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s net margin of 17.26%. Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 11.1% beat Powell Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.79%.

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $109.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.91%. On the other hand Powell Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $267.26 which suggests that it could fall by -20.5%. Given that Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Powell Industries, Inc., analysts believe Franklin Electric Co., Inc. is more attractive than Powell Industries, Inc..

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has a beta of 1.074, which suggesting that the stock is 7.351% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Powell Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.309%.

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Powell Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Franklin Electric Co., Inc. pays 25.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Powell Industries, Inc. pays out 7.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $581.7M, which are larger than Powell Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $298M. Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s net income of $17.1M is lower than Powell Industries, Inc.'s net income of $51.4M. Notably, Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.46x while Powell Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Electric Co., Inc. is 2.16x versus 3.70x for Powell Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regal Rexnord Corp. has a net margin of 2.94% compared to Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s net margin of 5.34%. Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 11.1% beat Regal Rexnord Corp.'s return on equity of 3.97%.

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $109.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.91%. On the other hand Regal Rexnord Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $181.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.73%. Given that Regal Rexnord Corp. has higher upside potential than Franklin Electric Co., Inc., analysts believe Regal Rexnord Corp. is more attractive than Franklin Electric Co., Inc..

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has a beta of 1.074, which suggesting that the stock is 7.351% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regal Rexnord Corp. has a beta of 1.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.589%.

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Regal Rexnord Corp. offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Franklin Electric Co., Inc. pays 25.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord Corp. pays out 47.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $581.7M, which are smaller than Regal Rexnord Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s net income of $17.1M is lower than Regal Rexnord Corp.'s net income of $80M. Notably, Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.46x while Regal Rexnord Corp.'s PE ratio is 37.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Electric Co., Inc. is 2.16x versus 1.64x for Regal Rexnord Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.