AGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Endeavour Silver Corp. has a net margin of 59.77% compared to Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -30.56%. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.57% beat Endeavour Silver Corp.'s return on equity of -19.75%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $52.25, signalling upside risk potential of 30.07%. On the other hand Endeavour Silver Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.1667 which suggests that it could grow by 15.9%. Given that Alamos Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Endeavour Silver Corp., analysts believe Alamos Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Endeavour Silver Corp..

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.4% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Endeavour Silver Corp. has a beta of 1.230, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.048%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Endeavour Silver Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold, Inc. pays 14.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Endeavour Silver Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $462.3M, which are larger than Endeavour Silver Corp. quarterly revenues of $137.3M. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net income of $276.3M is higher than Endeavour Silver Corp.'s net income of -$42M. Notably, Alamos Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.51x while Endeavour Silver Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold, Inc. is 10.54x versus 9.39x for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a net margin of 59.77% compared to Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.57% beat Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $52.25, signalling upside risk potential of 30.07%. On the other hand Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alamos Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc., analysts believe Alamos Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc..

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.4% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a beta of -0.953, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 195.315%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold, Inc. pays 14.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $462.3M, which are larger than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net income of $276.3M is higher than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$162.8K. Notably, Alamos Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.51x while Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold, Inc. is 10.54x versus -- for Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of 59.77% compared to Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.57% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $52.25, signalling upside risk potential of 30.07%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $60.49 which suggests that it could grow by 101.63%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alamos Gold, Inc., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Alamos Gold, Inc..

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.4% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.807, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.253%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold, Inc. pays 14.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $462.3M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net income of $276.3M is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Alamos Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.51x while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold, Inc. is 10.54x versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria Gold Corp. has a net margin of 59.77% compared to Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -10.81%. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.57% beat Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $52.25, signalling upside risk potential of 30.07%. On the other hand Victoria Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alamos Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe Alamos Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.4% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 19.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1824.925%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Victoria Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold, Inc. pays 14.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $462.3M, which are larger than Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $61.5M. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net income of $276.3M is higher than Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Alamos Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.51x while Victoria Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold, Inc. is 10.54x versus 0.02x for Victoria Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.