AGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coeur Mining, Inc. has a net margin of 75.6% compared to Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net margin of 31.82%. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.81% beat Coeur Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.35%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $56.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.72%. On the other hand Coeur Mining, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.14 which suggests that it could grow by 2.2%. Given that Alamos Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Coeur Mining, Inc., analysts believe Alamos Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Coeur Mining, Inc..

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.4% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coeur Mining, Inc. has a beta of 1.214, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.377%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. Coeur Mining, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold, Inc. pays 4.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Coeur Mining, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $575.3M, which are smaller than Coeur Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues of $675.6M. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net income of $434.9M is higher than Coeur Mining, Inc.'s net income of $215M. Notably, Alamos Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.02x while Coeur Mining, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold, Inc. is 12.26x versus 7.88x for Coeur Mining, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Endeavour Silver Corp. has a net margin of 75.6% compared to Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -30.56%. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.81% beat Endeavour Silver Corp.'s return on equity of -19.75%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $56.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.72%. On the other hand Endeavour Silver Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.1667 which suggests that it could fall by -6.15%. Given that Alamos Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Endeavour Silver Corp., analysts believe Alamos Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Endeavour Silver Corp..

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.4% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Endeavour Silver Corp. has a beta of 1.230, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.048%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. Endeavour Silver Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold, Inc. pays 4.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Endeavour Silver Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $575.3M, which are larger than Endeavour Silver Corp. quarterly revenues of $137.3M. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net income of $434.9M is higher than Endeavour Silver Corp.'s net income of -$42M. Notably, Alamos Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.02x while Endeavour Silver Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold, Inc. is 12.26x versus 11.59x for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of 75.6% compared to Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.81% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $56.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.72%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $60.49 which suggests that it could grow by 56.79%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alamos Gold, Inc., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Alamos Gold, Inc..

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.4% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.807, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.253%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold, Inc. pays 4.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $575.3M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net income of $434.9M is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Alamos Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.02x while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold, Inc. is 12.26x versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria Gold Corp. has a net margin of 75.6% compared to Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -10.81%. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.81% beat Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $56.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.72%. On the other hand Victoria Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alamos Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe Alamos Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.4% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 19.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1824.925%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. Victoria Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold, Inc. pays 4.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $575.3M, which are larger than Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $61.5M. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net income of $434.9M is higher than Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Alamos Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.02x while Victoria Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold, Inc. is 12.26x versus 0.01x for Victoria Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.