AGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of 59.77% compared to Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -27.31%. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.57% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $44.63, signalling upside risk potential of 23.65%. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.79 which suggests that it could grow by 9.26%. Given that Alamos Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gold Royalty Corp., analysts believe Alamos Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Gold Royalty Corp..

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.632, which suggesting that the stock is 36.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Alamos Gold, Inc. pays 14.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $462.3M, which are larger than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net income of $276.3M is higher than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Alamos Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.31x while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold, Inc. is 9.47x versus 51.63x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen, Inc. has a net margin of 59.77% compared to Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -0.91%. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.57% beat McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.43%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $44.63, signalling upside risk potential of 23.65%. On the other hand McEwen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.20 which suggests that it could grow by 18.59%. Given that Alamos Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than McEwen, Inc., analysts believe Alamos Gold, Inc. is more attractive than McEwen, Inc..

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.632, which suggesting that the stock is 36.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.347%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. McEwen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold, Inc. pays 14.37% of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $462.3M, which are larger than McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net income of $276.3M is higher than McEwen, Inc.'s net income of -$462K. Notably, Alamos Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.31x while McEwen, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold, Inc. is 9.47x versus 6.03x for McEwen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of 59.77% compared to Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.57% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $44.63, signalling upside risk potential of 23.65%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.03 which suggests that it could grow by 53.41%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alamos Gold, Inc., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Alamos Gold, Inc..

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.632, which suggesting that the stock is 36.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.933%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold, Inc. pays 14.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $462.3M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net income of $276.3M is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Alamos Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.31x while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold, Inc. is 9.47x versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria Gold Corp. has a net margin of 59.77% compared to Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -10.81%. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.57% beat Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $44.63, signalling upside risk potential of 23.65%. On the other hand Victoria Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alamos Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe Alamos Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.632, which suggesting that the stock is 36.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 18.710, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1770.964%.

Alamos Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. Victoria Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold, Inc. pays 14.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $462.3M, which are larger than Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $61.5M. Alamos Gold, Inc.'s net income of $276.3M is higher than Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Alamos Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.31x while Victoria Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold, Inc. is 9.47x versus 0.01x for Victoria Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.